Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > Barney Frank is at it again.

Barney Frank is at it again.
Thread Tools
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 24, 2009, 12:15 PM
 
Reps Frank and Weiner want Fannie and Freddie to relax rules for lending on Condos. I wonder who Frank will blame if the condo market implodes from bad loans.
Fannie, Freddie asked to relax condo loan rules: report | Reuters
(Reuters) - Two U.S. Democratic lawmakers want Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to relax recently tightened standards for mortgages on new condominiums, saying they could threaten the viability of some developments and slow the housing-market recovery, the Wall Street Journal said.

In March, Fannie Mae (FNM.N)(FNM.P) said it would no longer guarantee mortgages on condos in buildings where fewer than 70 percent of the units have been sold, up from 51 percent, the paper said. Freddie Mac (FRE.P)(FRE.N) is due to implement similar policies next month, the paper said.

In a letter to the CEO's of both companies, Representatives Barney Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Anthony Weiner warned that a 70 percent sales threshold "may be too onerous" and could lead condo buyers to shun new developments, according to the paper.

The legislators asked the companies to "make appropriate adjustments" to their underwriting standards for condos, the paper added.

In an interview with the paper, Weiner said the rules have "had a real chill on the ability to get these condos sold," at a time when prices of condos have fallen enough to attract potential buyers.

In addition to the 70 percent sales threshold, Fannie Mae will also not purchase mortgages in buildings where 15 percent of owners are delinquent on condo association dues or where one owner has more than 10 percent of units, as the firm sees these as signals that a building could run into financial trouble, the paper added.

Both Fannie and Freddie are preparing a response to the lawmakers, according to the paper.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could not be immediately reached for comment by Reuters.

(Reporting by Chakradhar Adusumilli in Bangalore; editing by Simon Jessop)
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 24, 2009, 12:28 PM
 
Wow, he is truly incorrigible. That's like Bernie Madoff creating a new hedge fund.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 24, 2009, 12:43 PM
 
It will be the Republicans fault, because years ago they didn't want as much regulation on something not related.

This guy is truly shameless.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 24, 2009, 05:01 PM
 
Conservatives/Republicans for more regulation?
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 24, 2009, 08:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by hyteckit View Post
Conservatives/Republicans for more regulation?
...of stuff that actually causes problems and endangers taxpayer dollars?

Sure, as always.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Jun 24, 2009, 09:08 PM
 
Barney is such a f***ing retard.

-t
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Garden of Paradise Motel, Suite 3D
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2009, 12:31 PM
 
Originally Posted by hyteckit View Post
Conservatives/Republicans for more regulation?
No, not more regulation, just NO MORE SUBSIDIES of that industry from Freddie/Fannie. See, when Freddie/Fannie target something, it becomes more popular. Why? Because they're backed by the govt. Or at least the market "thought" they were backed by the govt. (according to the rates they paid on their own bonds). So... if they do risky stuff, not only is it backed by taxpayers (explicity, now) but it also encourages people to do MORE STUPID RISKY STUFF.

If that's regulation, now, then welcome to 1984.
He can be fixed -- you can't.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Maysville, NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 29, 2009, 04:49 AM
 
Still think my five spot on him croaking is classy? This guy is a pile of **** and I'm gonna dance the jig the day he passes on.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2