MacNN Forums (http://forums.macnn.com/)
-   Mac News (http://forums.macnn.com/mac-news/)
-   -   Apple settles in-app purchasing lawsuit over kids' buying (http://forums.macnn.com/112/mac-news/498405/apple-settles-app-purchasing-lawsuit-over/)

 
NewsPoster Feb 25, 2013 08:49 PM
Apple settles in-app purchasing lawsuit over kids' buying
Apple has agreed to settle a <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/279884==http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/13/plot-thickens-in-apple-bait-apps-case/" rel='nofollow'>lawsuit</a> filed by parents whose children may or may not have had access to their iTunes passwords and racked up unauthorized charges -- sometimes in the hundreds of dollars -- by buying in-game currencies through in-app purchases. The company will issue $5 iTunes credits <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/279885==http://gigaom.com/2013/02/25/apple-settles-lawsuit-over-apps-aimed-at-kids-will-pay-5-itunes-credit-or-cash/" rel='nofollow'>in most cases</a> but may be obligated to provide full "refunds" (though it was not the company that collected the money) due to a loophole where an authorized purchase could be followed by an unauthorized one for several minutes afterward without re-asking for the password.<br />
<br />
In most case, children making unauthorized in-app purchases had access to the parents' iTunes password -- the parents were simply unaware that many so-called "freemium" games have in-app purchase options that go beyond what the game cost (if anything) initially. Nonetheless, a group of parents sued Apple because of the loophole that allowed the authorized use of a password to remain valid for up to 15 minutes after the initial purchase, allowing for other purchases that could be made without re-entering the password.

Apple will reimburse claimants with a $5 iTunes credit or the equivalent amount in cash, while claims exceeding $30 can apply for a full refund, reports <em>GigaOm</em>. In order to be awarded a claim, users in the suit will have to swear under oath that a minor bought game currency through an in-app purchase without access to the adult's iTunes password.

The company changed its policy on password authorization windows back when it released iOS 4.3. It argued in court that parents have always had the ability to stop children from making in-app purchases through Parental Controls, but this was not enough to persuade the parents or the judge in the case that this amounted to adequate protection.

According to reports, unauthorized charges went up to and well over $300 in some cases. The lawsuit was originally filed in April of 2011, and if the current settlement is approved by the judge in the case, payments will begin sometime late in the year.


<div align="center"><p style=" margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block;"> <a title="View Apple's Bait App Settlement on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/127254378" style="text-decoration: underline;" >Apple's Bait App Settlement</a> by <a title="View 's profile on Scribd" href="undefined" style="text-decoration: underline;" ></a> </p><iframe class="scribd_iframe_embed" src="http://www.scribd.com/embeds/127254378/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll" data-auto-height="false" data-aspect-ratio="undefined" scrolling="no" id="doc_85391" width="100%" height="600" frameborder="0"></iframe></div>
 
davoud Feb 25, 2013 10:17 PM
Clueless Parents
The kids are allowed to have the parents' password and Apple is responsible? The parents "were simply unaware" and Apple is responsible? Not in my court of law.
 
Charles Martin Feb 26, 2013 09:04 AM
Hey, yeah, there was a missing bit in the opening sentence, it should have read "may or may not have had" access to the parents' password, that's been corrected. This is reiterated later in the article where it says that in order to file a claim, parents must swear that the kid didn't have access to their password and instead took advantage of that 15-minute window.
 
Grendelmon Feb 26, 2013 09:16 AM
Clueless? Mabye some, but
Quote
Nonetheless, a group of parents sued Apple because of the loophole that allowed the authorized use of a password to remain valid for up to 15 minutes after the initial purchase, allowing for other purchases that could be made without re-entering the password.
If Apple simply made the password requirement "immediately" by default, instead of the 15 minute timeout, this argument would have very little merit.

Also, if Apple would catch up to Android and actually implement multiple users for iOS, you could create a login for your children on your device with parental restrictions enabled, instead of having to globally enable/disable it when Mom and Dad actually want to use it.
 
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2007 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2