MacNN Forums (
-   Mac News (
-   -   Lawsuit: Apple let SD-only customers rent HD movies, kept the change (

NewsPoster Jul 8, 2013 11:20 PM
Lawsuit: Apple let SD-only customers rent HD movies, kept the change
A San Francisco man is <a href="" rel='nofollow'>suing Apple</a> for formerly allowing people who rent high-definition movies even though their equipment is incapable of displaying the format -- meaning the customers who didn't understand the difference essentially got charged $1 more than they should to rent movies or other videos from the iTunes store. Apple has since corrected the issue, and now displays a warning when HD-renting customers are using standard-definition (SD) devices, but plaintiff Scott J. Weiselberg claims that while the rented movie would fall back to SD automatically, Apple kept the $1 HD premium charge.<br />
<br />
Weiselberg gave the specific example that he owned an iPhone 3G, which does not display HD material. He rented the movie Big Daddy for $4.99 in June of 2010, and claims to have been unaware that an SD version of the movie was available for $3.99.<br />
<br />
At the time, Apple had two buttons for movie rental choices, offering the SD or HD (which at the time meant 720p) version and displaying the price, much as the store does now. Weisenberg claims that Apple capitalized on the confusion, pocketing "millions of dollars in undeserved profits," though he does not offer any proof that anyone apart from himself accidentally rented an HD movie when they did not have equipment capable of playing it back at that resolution. While he is probably not the only person to have made the mistake, his brief offers no evidence of anyone else who had the issue.<br />
<br />
The HD option is generally the preferred or default option for movie rentals nowadays, but at the time Apple failed to disclose to customers using older Apple devices that their machines could not play any HD content they would rent, and would fall back to the SD version. If that happened, the company did not adjusting the rental rate to reflect this, Weisenberg says. Apple may have an excuse for that claim, however, as its movie rental service has always allowed users to switch among devices -- some of which would have been capable of displaying the HD content.<br />
<br />
Weisenberg is filing his complaint as a class-action lawsuit in Federal court, saying that Apple's policy at the time constituted "fraudulent omission" in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law. He seeks restitution, disgorgement of the allegedly ill-gotten profits, an injunction and damages for "unjust enrichment."<br />
<br />
<br />
Mississauga Jul 9, 2013 05:45 AM
Scott J. Weiselberg is a boob. Once again, only the lawyer will profit from this.
sgorneau Jul 9, 2013 10:54 AM
This is fun! I have a DVD player hooked up to an old SD TV in my basement. Now I can sue Netflix for all the DVDs I've watched because the TV I have is only capable of SD display!!!!
aristotles Jul 9, 2013 11:27 AM
Great, it is because of idiots like him that I now have to switch the resolution on my 15" rMBP to scaled 1920X1200 to purchase some HD movies now. Thanks a lot Scott. Can we all sue him for making our lives harder? Let's launch a class action lawsuit against Scott J. Weiselberg. Who's with me?
dwoodruff Jul 9, 2013 11:58 AM
This is idiocy. Is he outraged at Target for selling BlueRay discs without asking customers if their equipment can support it?
The Vicar Jul 9, 2013 02:29 PM
I misread this headline as "SSD-only" and was wondering what the heck this had to do with hard drives...
elroth Jul 9, 2013 05:48 PM
I say give him his $1 back and send him home.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:38 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2007 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2