MacNN Forums (http://forums.macnn.com/)
-   MacNN Lounge (http://forums.macnn.com/macnn-lounge/)
-   -   Apple now owns a semiconductor company (http://forums.macnn.com/89/macnn-lounge/366899/apple-now-owns-a-semiconductor-company/)

 
Eug Apr 23, 2008 07:15 AM
Apple now owns a semiconductor company
Apple Buys Chip Designer - Forbes.com

Do you remember these guys? They're the guys who designed a new PowerPC chip and people wondered if Apple could have used it in their laptops, but Apple switched to Intel.

However, methinks that Apple could use PA Semi chips in stuff like the iPod and iPhone.
 
Dork. Apr 23, 2008 07:42 AM
Interesting. It seems to be stocked with microprocessor design veterans from all over. They know what they're doing.

A bit of a nit-picky note, though: this is not a semiconductor company. These guys do microprocessor design, but they don't actually make their own chips, they contract that part out to companies like TSMC or a host of other countries in Asia. (I don't know who they actually use). So they're more accurately referred to as a "fabless semiconductor" company, since they have no expensive IC fab to maintain. And Apple has always had chip designers in their company, so the fact that Apple has bought a fabless semiconductor company is not all that novel.

However, I don't mean to knock the purchase; given the type of people working there and the projects they are rumored to be working on, you can expect Apple to come out with some interesting stuff in the next few years based on this technology -- powerful and tiny, with low power consumption. Maybe another PDA? :P
 
BasketofPuppies Apr 23, 2008 07:58 AM
The iPod and iPhone are PDAs. There is not enough of a market for Apple to justify releasing a PDA that is only a PDA.

Anyway, I agree with Eug. We will see these chips powering future iPods, iPhones and whatever other not full-fledged computer devices Apple has planned.
 
Dork. Apr 23, 2008 08:20 AM
Quote, Originally Posted by BasketofPuppies (Post 3644312)
The iPod and iPhone are PDAs. There is not enough of a market for Apple to justify releasing a PDA that is only a PDA.
I know, That's why the :P was there.

:P
 
Eug Apr 23, 2008 08:23 AM
Yeah, fabless semiconductor company but semiconductor nonetheless. This is probably better anyway, since Apple really doesn't need to get into the fabbing business. Too much of a headache.

Anyways, one of the weird things about this purchase is that their products are not really appropriate for the iPod or iPhone as of yet. Too much power usage.

P.A. Semi - PWRficient 1682M

They could have new processors in the pipeline though.
 
Eug Apr 23, 2008 09:17 AM
PWRficient PA6T-1682M 64-bit dual-core processor

7 Watts per core
SPECint2000 = 1000 <-- Roughly the speed of a 2.8 GHz P4
SPECfp2000 = 1500 <-- Roughly the speed of a 3.4 GHz P4E.

P.S. The founder of P.A. Semi was involved in StrongARM design, and Apple used an ARM chip in the Apple Newton. :)
 
C.A.T.S. CEO Apr 23, 2008 09:25 AM
I could see Apple using these processors in larger mobile products (ie, something in between the iPhone and MBA). Why they want to do that, I don't know...
 
Eug Apr 23, 2008 09:36 AM
Quote, Originally Posted by Eug (Post 3644341)
The founder of P.A. Semi was involved in StrongARM design, and Apple used an ARM chip in the Apple Newton. :)
I forgot to mention that the leader (besides Jobs) in the acquisition process was Tony Fadell, who just happens to be senior VP of the iPod group at Apple.
 
Big Mac Apr 23, 2008 09:55 AM
Great news.
 
Dakar the Fourth Apr 23, 2008 09:58 AM
So, does this mean we have to worry about migrating to another architecture or what?
 
Big Mac Apr 23, 2008 10:01 AM
Yes, PPC is back! WOOt. In your face Mactel lovers. ;)

Not really. This seems to be a purchase pretty strongly linked to Apple's handheld platform. OTOH, this company was producing PPC designs so, hey, one can dream, right?
 
Eug Apr 23, 2008 10:14 AM
Quote, Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth (Post 3644358)
So, does this mean we have to worry about migrating to another architecture or what?
Well, the existing architecture at PA Semi is PowerPC, which Apple already supports.


Quote, Originally Posted by Big Mac (Post 3644361)
Yes, PPC is back! WOOt. In your face Mactel lovers. ;)

Not really. This seems to be a purchase pretty strongly linked to Apple's handheld platform. OTOH, this company was producing PPC designs so, hey, one can dream, right?
Yeah, dream about PPC handhelds. :stick::)
 
Dakar the Fourth Apr 23, 2008 10:16 AM
You know what I mean.
 
Eug Apr 23, 2008 10:20 AM
Quote, Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth (Post 3644369)
You know what I mean.
Actually I didn't. Were you making a joke? Or was it an honest question?

If the former, I obviously didn't get it.
If the latter, I don't really know. They could stick with PPC, or I suppose they could possibly develop other low power chips based on different architectures. If they stuck with PPC, I wonder if that'd make it easier for Apple to expand the iPhone/iPod platform.
 
Dakar the Fourth Apr 23, 2008 10:23 AM
No, not a joke. Sure, Apple still supports PPC, but since all their manufactured hardware runs on intel, I'd consider that a migration if they went back to PPC.
 
Big Mac Apr 23, 2008 10:26 AM
PPC4Ever.
 
Eug Apr 23, 2008 10:32 AM
Quote, Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth (Post 3644372)
No, not a joke. Sure, Apple still supports PPC, but since all their manufactured hardware runs on intel, I'd consider that a migration if they went back to PPC.
The iPhone/iPod doesn't run on Intel. It's ARM/Xscale, which is (now) Marvell.
 
Dakar the Fourth Apr 23, 2008 10:33 AM
Computer Hardware. Geez.
 
Eug Apr 23, 2008 10:41 AM
Quote, Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth (Post 3644376)
Computer Hardware. Geez.
Even in my first post I said that the acquisition may have much more to do with the iPod/iPhone platform than computer hardware.

I don't think Apple will consider using PA Semi stuff for its laptops or desktops. It could theoretically for a low end laptop, but I don't really see any reason to do so. It make much more sense to just stick with Intel for that.

However, for a set top box (like AppleTV), a derivative or that chip could be used, but I'm not counting on that either.

The most likely target would be the iPhone/iPod platform. Yeah it could be a "migration" from ARM/Xscale to PPC for that platform, but I do wonder if having PPC there might make things easier since they have so much experience with PPC already. Plus, they could taylor the chip design much better than if they used 3rd party chips.

Or perhaps, PA Semi could design a chip based on the ARM arch. The CEO of PA Semi is very experienced at this.
 
SSharon Apr 23, 2008 10:41 AM
whatever apple ends up doing with this will I'm sure be cool. It also means that the competition will have a harder time catching up.
 
Nodnarb Apr 23, 2008 10:41 AM
Quote, Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth (Post 3644376)
Computer Hardware. Geez.
No one's talkinga bout these chips replacing Intel chips inside macs. That's going to stay.

The article says that they see these chips being developed for the new "handheld computing platform," the iPod touch and iPhone. They aren't turning their backs on Intel for their macs.
 
Dakar the Fourth Apr 23, 2008 10:46 AM
Quote, Originally Posted by Eug (Post 3644380)
Even in my first post I said that the acquisition may have much more to do with the iPod/iPhone platform than computer hardware.

I don't think Apple will consider using PA Semi stuff for its laptops or desktops. It could theoretically for a low end laptop, but I don't really see any reason to do so. It make much more sense to just stick with Intel for that.

However, for a set top box (like AppleTV), a derivative or that chip could be used, but I'm not counting on that either.

The most likely target would be the iPhone/iPod platform. Yeah it could be a "migration" from ARM/Xscale to PPC for that platform, but I do wonder if having PPC there might make things easier since they have so much experience with PPC already. Plus, they could taylor the chip design much better than if they used 3rd party chips.
Quote, Originally Posted by Nodnarb (Post 3644383)
No one's talkinga bout these chips replacing Intel chips inside macs. That's going to stay.

The article says that they see these chips being developed for the new "handheld computing platform," the iPod touch and iPhone. They aren't turning their backs on Intel for their macs.
Okay. I did catch the part about mobile platforms but since I don't follow this stuff, I wasn't 100% sure that meant it would only affect that.
 
Lateralus Apr 23, 2008 12:33 PM
Quote, Originally Posted by Big Mac (Post 3644373)
PPC4Ever.
:D

Sweet, sweet vindication.
 
olePigeon Apr 23, 2008 01:16 PM
Anyone here get the Newton logo engraved on their iPhone or iPod Touch yet? :)
 
analogue SPRINKLES Apr 23, 2008 01:28 PM
Quote, Originally Posted by Eug (Post 3644298)
Do you remember these guys? They're the guys who designed a new PowerPC chip and people wondered if Apple could have used it in their laptops, but Apple switched to Intel.
Weird for once I don't remember that. Anyone have more background?
 
Eug Apr 23, 2008 01:38 PM
Quote, Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES (Post 3644473)
Weird for once I don't remember that. Anyone have more background?
P.A. Semi's major PowerPC announcement, and looking back at The Switch
Apple shunned superstar chip start-up for Intel | The Register
 
mduell Apr 23, 2008 06:44 PM
Quote, Originally Posted by Eug (Post 3644341)
PWRficient PA6T-1682M 64-bit dual-core processor

7 Watts per core
SPECint2000 = 1000 <-- Roughly the speed of a 2.8 GHz P4
SPECfp2000 = 1500 <-- Roughly the speed of a 3.4 GHz P4E.
Or the more relevant comparison for 2007:
SPECint2000 = 1000 <-- Roughly the speed of a 900Mhz ULV C2D
SPECfp2000 = 1500 <-- Roughly the speed of a 1.4 GHz ULV C2D
ULV C2D run at 5W per core.

Fail.
 
ghporter Apr 23, 2008 10:53 PM
A PowerPC processor that uses less power (hopefully less than a Core X Duo), is faster, and capable of being produced in huge quantities would be a very cool thing indeed. Right now Intel is sitting pretty, with AMD just poking at them. They NEED competition, and WE need them to have competition. For everyone's benefit, really, but for the consumer most of all.

I hope this spins into something revolutionary.
 
Eug Apr 24, 2008 12:16 AM
EETimes.com - DoD may push back on Apple's P.A. Semi bid

"P.A. Semi customers were told the acquiring company was not interested in the startup's products or road map, but is buying the company for its intellectual property and engineering talent."
 
Kenneth Apr 24, 2008 12:22 AM
Quote, Originally Posted by Big Mac (Post 3644373)
PPC4Ever.
:thumbsup:
 
mduell Apr 24, 2008 11:24 AM
Quote, Originally Posted by Eug (Post 3644772)
EETimes.com - DoD may push back on Apple's P.A. Semi bid

"P.A. Semi customers were told the acquiring company was not interested in the startup's products or road map, but is buying the company for its intellectual property and engineering talent."
Since PA Semi doesn't actually produce the chips, and Apple isn't interested in the chip designs, I don't see this as a big issue. Sell the chip design to a fab or another company so they can continue to sell the chip to the DoD while Apple runs away with the PA staff and IP.
 
Powerbook Apr 24, 2008 02:38 PM
Quote, Originally Posted by Big Mac (Post 3644373)
PPC4Ever.
HELL YES!

Why does nobody mention Apple's former daughter company (sort of) ARM? Only young whippersnappers around? This is somewhat the repetition.

PB.
 
analogue SPRINKLES Apr 24, 2008 02:48 PM
I think apple is just wants them to develop their own chips for use in the iPhone as the CPU is a huge cost for them. If they can get it at cost the 250 mil they spent will pay off in no time.

No way are they going to use these chips in laptops and switch us all back to PPC again.
 
mduell Apr 24, 2008 03:27 PM
Quote, Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES (Post 3645042)
I think apple is just wants them to develop their own chips for use in the iPhone as the CPU is a huge cost for them. If they can get it at cost the 250 mil they spent will pay off in no time.
iPhone CPU less than$18.50 (iSuppli estimate Jan/2007). PA Semi doesn't actually fab the chips, so even after Apple buys PA Semi, they still have to pay another company to fab them. While your idea may be profitable when they sell a hundred million units, the ROI looks pretty poor. And then of course there are Apple's comments that they just want the people and the IP, not the products.

:thumbsdow

Quote, Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES (Post 3645042)
No way are they going to use these chips in laptops and switch us all back to PPC again.
Absolutely not, given the power/performance comparison I provided above.

:thumbsup:
 
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2007 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2