Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > dual 1.8 G5 memory question

dual 1.8 G5 memory question
Thread Tools
iceaxe23
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 21, 2005, 10:40 PM
 
well got new memory for my g5 and it boots and seems to be fine but I have a question. In system profile it shows memory speed as pc3200U-25440 what is the 25440 part?
because one of the 4 sticks does not have that number(dimm 2):
DIMM0/J11:

Size: 512 MB
Type: DDR SDRAM
Speed: PC3200U-25440

DIMM1/J12:

Size: 512 MB
Type: DDR SDRAM
Speed: PC3200U-25440

DIMM2/J13:

Size: 512 MB
Type: DDR SDRAM
Speed: PC3200U-30440

DIMM3/J14:

Size: 512 MB
Type: DDR SDRAM
Speed: PC3200U-25440


is this a problem?? I am freaking out...lol j/k
I just want to make sure it is ok to run it like this...wierd
G5 dual 1.8
G4 350 superdrive now 1GHZ (gone to a new home)
Ibook 600
Mac SE
     
Jo�o L�cio
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oeiras, Portugal
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 26, 2005, 06:52 PM
 
I guess that number is the latency (CL).

From Crucial:
"CL stands for CAS (column address strobe) latency, which is the number of clock cycles it takes before data starts to flow after a command is received. Low CAS latency at a given frequency is faster than high CAS latency at that same frequency. (For example, CAS2 is faster than CAS3.) However, lower CAS latency will NOT necessarily make your system faster. Your computer will only run as fast as the "slowest link" in your system, so you can't speed up your computer by adding memory that is faster than your current memory. The way to make your system faster is to add more megabytes (MB) of memory."

It appears you bought memory with different configurations. You should replace the slower module (the different one).
     
CIA
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 26, 2005, 07:59 PM
 
Just a note about that, yes, CAS speeds matter, but, for General use, you honestly would never know the difference. We are talking milliseconds of time savings here. For certain long term number crunching apps you would see some time savings, but for average day to day use, as long as it seems ok stick with it.
The time saved you would lose later as you sipped your coffee.
I would stick with what you have, and just add more, or look to remove other bottlenecks in your system if you have any.

my 2cents
Work: 2008 8x3.2 MacPro, 8800GT, 16GB ram, zillions of HDs. (video editing)
Home: 2008 24" 2.8 iMac, 2TB Int, 4GB ram.
Road: 2009 13" 2.26 Macbook Pro, 8GB ram & 640GB WD blue internal
Retired to BOINC only: My trusty never-gonna-die 12" iBook G4 1.25
     
jamil5454
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Downtown Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 27, 2005, 09:48 AM
 
I agree.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,