|
|
Help: Camera Filters and Lens
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tasmania
Status:
Offline
|
|
Am thinking of buy a filter adaptor for my sweet ass Sony V-3 digital camera which will let me use 58mm lens and filters.
Any boffins out there that can tell me whether i'll be able to use any 58mm lens/filter with the adaptor or will i be stuck with sony ones only? Im guessing I'll be free as a bird but want to check first.
oh and any one have any good recommendations for what to use when? Like what sort of filters are good for sunsets/waterfalls/etc/etc
thanks peeps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Status:
Offline
|
|
I feel obligated to respond....
Filter: Any 58mm filter will fit once you have the adapter. Don't buy sony's overpriced crap; however, do buy a good brand: Heliopan or B+W.
A skylight or UV filter is good protection filter (it does adjust the image only slightly; most people can't tell). Circular Polarizer is a good all around filter that makes colors richer and is adjustable (note: only get circular polarizer becuase a linear polarizer will screw with your auto focus).
Beyond those two, it depends... I'd invest in a cokin filter system because of the options available. Some sunsets look good with a graduated yellow or orange. Most waterfall pictures require a longer shutter speed to make them look natural and flowing; a neutral density filter will help you achieve the lower shutter speed without the compromise of the aperture and depth of field. There are so many options with cokin; just visit their website. Check out the brochures section.
Lenses: I would suggest buying sony's lenses simply because in general, aftermarket lenses are pretty horrible. Adding lenses to additional lenses isn't a good idea (IMHO); the images aren't the highest quality. Of course, I am more of a purist, single focal lenght lense sort of guy.
Let me know if I can be of any additional assistance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Camera God
A skylight or UV filter is good protection filter (it does adjust the image only slightly; most people can't tell). .
A good UV filter shouldn't change *anything*.
Also watch out with vignetting if you use cokin. I'm not a big fan of Cokin but they make good stuff. I don't like them because of the mount system they have, I prefer screw-on filters.
|
iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Goldfinger
A good UV filter shouldn't change *anything*.
I disagree. If you look through a B+W UV it actually looks sharper than without. But that is what you get for paying $50+ for a UV filter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well my B+W and Nikon filters don't change anything (that you can see). In theory they shouldn't change anything.
|
iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Aussie in UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Goldfinger
A good UV filter shouldn't change *anything*.
Also watch out with vignetting if you use cokin. I'm not a big fan of Cokin but they make good stuff. I don't like them because of the mount system they have, I prefer screw-on filters.
I would argue that a UV filter does take a bit of haze out of the image.
The Cokin system is pretty good as long as you get the right size for your lense combo. The smallest series (is it A?) should be alright but as Goldfinger said, check for vignetting (when it darkens the edges of the image as it is encroaching on what the lense sees).
I think I have the P system (about 75mm wide filters) for my EOS 10D which was a holdover from my old film system. As I am now using wider lenses, I am starting to see vingetting so I may have to look into the full size (100mm+) systems, most likely the Lee system.
You would be happy with Coken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Status:
Offline
|
|
As long as you are concious about how you are using the Cokin filters, there should be no problem. The sad part is, no one these days wants to think about the photographs they are taking.
Goldfinger - try taking a look through one eye at something with detail at a medium distance (20 - 30 ft). Move the B+W filter in and out of your line of sight. You should notice that looking through the B+W filter is sharper than your eye alone. Another good test just to show how nice the B+W filters are is to lay one down on a white sheet of paper next to a Tiffen multicoated UV and a single coated UV. All except for the B+W usually have a slight yellow tinge to them. It is quite disgusting considering many people put that in front of their lenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tasmania
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nice thumbnails
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tasmania
Status:
Offline
|
|
yeah the old toss up, thumbnails or 8 megapixel monstrosities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|