|
|
Where the hell is 10.2.4 for OS X server!!!!
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
Arghh this is not funny anymore. I have some bugs and 10.2.4 was going to resolve these bugs. But where is it???
Apple please get on with server release. The 2 Gb/s fibre interface driver could be a seperate update later. Or is it the new tool for Xraid that delays the release?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: none
Status:
Offline
|
|
I second the emotion of the first post. Also, does anyone have an idea as to why this release would not be in tandem with Client 10.2.4?
Will it be released this week?
bueller? .... bueller?
--Dr_Doom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would immagine that Apple has a lot of issues to fix in software that is specific to server... while they are the same kernel, there is actually a notable difference in what is included with X workstation and X server.
As for me, I really hope they clean up OpenDirectory... From the problems that I've run into with their LDAP implementation, combined with what I've seen on the Apple support discussion boards, they have their work cut out.
All I can say is that this update had better be worth the wait... Wouldn't hurt Apple to release some updated documentation for 10.2 server either; many of the docs on their website are still for 10.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Liudger:
Arghh this is not funny anymore. I have some bugs and 10.2.4 was going to resolve these bugs. But where is it???
Apple please get on with server release.
I'll agree.. having to wait is bad.
Although... even worse is a trigger-happy server admin.
Servers needing fibre channel are generally not the type of servers upgraded prior to early-adopter stability reports.
OS X server updates should be subjected to more rigorous testing than client updates!
Just out of curiosity... what are you using fibre for?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: none
Status:
Offline
|
|
hrmm ... wouldn't any admin running OS X server in a production sense be called trigger happy by the IT world at large? _I_ don't think so, but I wonder why all previous releases have been in tandem and not this one. Does that mean that all the prior releases were not as thoroughly inspected? I don't think so, but I do hope that it is worth the additional wait.
Dr_Doom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Relax. It's coming. Soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
(
Last edited by piracy; Feb 24, 2003 at 08:46 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
WOO HOO! Let the madness begin...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Urbandale, IA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Holy crap! This thing is frickin' HUGE!
Yay.
|
"Yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation" yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Oneota:
Holy crap! This thing is frickin' HUGE!
Yay.
That sucks, just means more to break.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|