Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > GUI Customization > iTunes 4 still resistant!

iTunes 4 still resistant!
Thread Tools
Vi0
Baninated
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2003, 03:39 PM
 
too bad Apple won't allow you to turn off the metal in iTunes 4. And what's the deal with the OS 9-like window resizing?
     
Stradlater
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Off the Tobakoff
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2003, 04:24 PM
 
iTunes 4 is still carbon.
     
intastella
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2003, 04:30 PM
 
iTunes does outline resizing on my iBook 500 but does live resizing on my G4. Probably some kind of gauge built in to figure out which to use.

And just because it is Carbon doesn't mean anything. iTunes is probably one of the best performing iApps BECAUSE it is Carbon.

Don
     
Stradlater
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Off the Tobakoff
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2003, 05:15 PM
 
Originally posted by intastella:
And just because it is Carbon doesn't mean anything. iTunes is probably one of the best performing iApps BECAUSE it is Carbon.
did i say carbon was bad? no. and yes it does mean something: it means you can't turn off the metal appearance. i'm also not saying that i don't like metal, i'm fine with itunes's appearance. sheesh.
     
NetworkShadow
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2003, 07:25 PM
 
It doesn't run on OS 9 though does it? Why have it carbon if it's OS X only? I was wishing for skins too...
click one
     
Synotic
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2003, 09:48 PM
 
Originally posted by NetworkShadow:
It doesn't run on OS 9 though does it? Why have it carbon if it's OS X only? I was wishing for skins too...
Making it Cocoa just makes it slower plus it takes time and resources. And it doesn't run in OS 9 (well at least iTunes 3 didn't)
     
SwarmyCurve
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2003, 09:51 PM
 
I could care less if its Carbon or Cocoa... I just know it runs better than any of the other iApps. Have you ever tried iMovie?
     
NetworkShadow
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2003, 10:15 PM
 
The window resize thing might be to save CPU usage?
click one
     
mrtew
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: South Detroit
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2003, 11:16 PM
 
Originally posted by NetworkShadow:
The window resize thing might be to save CPU usage?

Maybe it has to do with QuartzExtreme. Both my TiGz and my roommate's Ti667 have live window resizing and they have QuartzExtreme.

I love the U.S., but we need some time apart.
     
dettociao
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pittsburgh, pa, usa
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 28, 2003, 11:17 PM
 
Originally posted by mrtew:
Maybe it has to do with QuartzExtreme. Both my TiGz and my roommate's Ti667 have live window resizing and they have QuartzExtreme.
As far as I know, it DOES. If you don't have QE then you don't get the live window resizing.
-.-
12" SuperDrive
     
NetworkShadow
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 12:21 AM
 
Ah.... I need a new Mac....
click one
     
Dace
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Montreal, Qc
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 01:54 AM
 
Originally posted by dettociao:
As far as I know, it DOES. If you don't have QE then you don't get the live window resizing.
I don't have QE and I get live resizing. And you don't need to get a new Mac NetworkShadow just a new graphics card.


Data Bytes Computers - Montreal, QC
Ventes & Services / Sales & Services
     
Vi0  (op)
Baninated
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 04:02 AM
 
Originally posted by Synotic:
Making it Cocoa just makes it slower plus it takes time and resources. And it doesn't run in OS 9 (well at least iTunes 3 didn't)
If this is your reasoning, then why have any application written in Cocoa? Why even have OS X? Why would Apple invent a slower and lesser programming language than the one they had previous to it? And OS 9 development is over. Why break the rules after you tell others to stop development.
     
invisibleX
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 09:18 AM
 
Just hold down command while resizing and it'll do it live. If you try that you'll see its pretty slow, while brushed-cocoa apps are fast.
-"I don't believe in God. "
"That doesn't matter. He believes in you."

-"I'm not agnostic. Just nonpartisan. Theological Switzerland, that's me."
     
daftpig
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 09:49 AM
 
Pardon me.. but i didn't feel a new thread was needed:

Is it just me or does anyone else think the widgets on iTunes4 suck?
     
Brien
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 10:19 AM
 
I like iTunes 4... looks much better. Can't wait for iFix�3
     
andretan
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Singapore
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 10:40 AM
 
Originally posted by invisibleX:
Just hold down command while resizing and it'll do it live. If you try that you'll see its pretty slow, while brushed-cocoa apps are fast.
Thanks for the tip!
mac.goodies webstore / Switched to an iBook in November 2002. Never looking back.
iBook R.I.P. 20 Nov 2002 - 2 Aug 2005
Hello Leopard! On iMac 17" Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz 2GB, iPod 5th gen 30GB and iPhone
     
daftpig
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 10:56 AM
 
Originally posted by brien:
I like iTunes 4... looks much better. Can't wait for iFix�3
oh ok.. what does iFix do btw?

EDIT: it's ok... don't need to reply. I'll go do a search..
     
wigglywoo
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 11:12 AM
 
iFix�2 will give QuickTime 6 and iTunes 3 the new iMovie 3 look. It also fixes various GUI elements that were outdated or bad looking.It also uses the new sunken titlebar buttons found in SmoothStripes/Aqua Extreme/Brushed.
     
daftpig
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 11:53 AM
 
Originally posted by wigglywoo:
iFix�2 will give QuickTime 6 and iTunes 3 the new iMovie 3 look. It also fixes various GUI elements that were outdated or bad looking.It also uses the new sunken titlebar buttons found in SmoothStripes/Aqua Extreme/Brushed.
oh ok. thanks! (my google skills fail me...)
     
MartiNZ
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 04:49 PM
 
Originally posted by invisibleX:
Just hold down command while resizing and it'll do it live. If you try that you'll see its pretty slow, while brushed-cocoa apps are fast.
Cool. It's nice to know that that's all it takes - there I was thinking that something else was lacking with my iBook 800 that was stopping it from being live. It's not even that slow, i.e. comparable to doing it in iCal here. Still odd that it sounds like some are getting it by default - not a G3 vs. G4 thing, is it ?
     
ambush
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 05:52 PM
 
Originally posted by Vi0:
If this is your reasoning, then why have any application written in Cocoa? Why even have OS X? Why would Apple invent a slower and lesser programming language than the one they had previous to it? And OS 9 development is over. Why break the rules after you tell others to stop development.
iTunes will never be ported to cocoa

oh and - the mp3/aiff/whatever format/ decoders are made with C++ and C (what I mean is that they don't use cocoa), most of the time, and they are the "part" of the app that handles most of the though work, so don't throw that "COCOA IS SLOWER" bullshit here.

I've seen mpg123-based Cocoa mp3 players that are twice as fast as iTunes.
     
NetworkShadow
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 06:07 PM
 
Originally posted by Dace:
I don't have QE and I get live resizing. And you don't need to get a new Mac NetworkShadow just a new graphics card.
No I do, I've got an iMac G3 450MHz, and it's not too easy to put new graphics cards in them. Also the processor is feeling slow to me now. It's time for a G4 or IBM 970. ^^

If anyone can put a different background texture in iTunes I'b be happy. But no pinstripes ether!
click one
     
Hi I'm Mike
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 07:58 PM
 
iSkinner doesn't work anymore? I know I changed the look of my other iTunes
     
Hi I'm Mike
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2003, 08:00 PM
 
looks like you can change the look just like in the OS, through the rsrc file.
PICT 1024
     
King Bob On The Cob
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 1, 2003, 12:32 AM
 
Originally posted by Hi I'm Mike:
looks like you can change the look just like in the OS, through the rsrc file.
PICT 1024
Does it still suffer from the greyscale problem?
     
Hi I'm Mike
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 1, 2003, 12:36 AM
 
Originally posted by King Bob On The Cob:
Does it still suffer from the greyscale problem?
I dunno, I have had grescale problems before and I have just changed it to rgb and put it back in and it worked.
     
ShotgunEd
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 2, 2003, 04:22 AM
 
Originally posted by ambush:
I've seen mpg123-based Cocoa mp3 players that are twice as fast as iTunes.
Won't all the singing sound like the chipmunks then?
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,