Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > Plausible specs for Powerbook line by year's end

Plausible specs for Powerbook line by year's end
Thread Tools
acadian
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Upwind from Quebec...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 09:29 AM
 
12"- 1Ghz G4, 32Mb GeForce
15"- 1.25 Ghz G4e, 64Mb Radeon 9600
17"- 1.4 Ghz G4e, 64Mb Radeon 9600

Yay? Nay? Seems reasonable as the last iteration of the G4 in the Powerbooks until the 980 rears it's pretty head.
     
mrmister
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 11:30 AM
 
Man, there are going to be a lot of angry people if for some reason the 17" PBs have better specs than the 15" ones.
     
TAZ
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 11:42 AM
 
Honestly, this is plausable. Given that Apple announced the upgrade of the eMac to 1 Ghz G4 processors it would be logical for the other lines to get upgraded, especially since the eMac is supposed to be the low man on the totem pole.

I can see a lot of people getting upset if they bump the 17" already, especially those who havent even gotten their machines yet.
     
acadian  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Upwind from Quebec...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 12:51 PM
 
Assuming the 17" is supposed to be the "flagship" portable (though it's not really too portable now is it), and the 15" is due for a serious update (can anyone say 9600?), this would leave the 17"s only attractive quality the screen. There has got to be more to it than that to justify the price difference between it and the 15". A 15" Al book with 1 Ghz proc and the 9600 in it would cannabalize 17" sales.
     
Shaddim
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 02:09 PM
 
this would leave the 17"s only attractive quality the screen.
That IS the whole point. In the portable market a 2" difference in display size is easily worth $500 (the price difference between the high end 15 and the 17).

The 15 and 17" PBs will keep the same specs after the 15" AlBook comes out. The only difference will be the display size. And you can quote me on that.
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
     
mcs37
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ithaca, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 02:51 PM
 
Originally posted by acadian:
Yay? Nay? Seems reasonable as the last iteration of the G4 in the Powerbooks until the 980 rears it's pretty head. [/B]
My bet is for the PPC970. Apple has every interest in deploying that ASAP. If the high questionable specs from the Frenchie site the other day are authentic, the introduction of (single|dual) PPC970 systems (including Powerbooks) would blow everyone else out of the water.
     
badnewsblair
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Richmond! VA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 03:14 PM
 
Originally posted by acadian:
Assuming the 17" is supposed to be the "flagship" portable (though it's not really too portable now is it), and the 15" is due for a serious update (can anyone say 9600?), this would leave the 17"s only attractive quality the screen. There has got to be more to it than that to justify the price difference between it and the 15". A 15" Al book with 1 Ghz proc and the 9600 in it would cannabalize 17" sales.
No offense, but if one more person says the 17-inch isn't portable I'm going to kick a baby!

I take mine verywhere with me. I have no prolems getting it anywhere. I even use it riding the metro going into DC (that should dispell rumors about airliner seats, cause no seat is smaller than those darn metro seats). It is portable, it is portable, WAH WAH! (if I hadn't whined enough already, heheheh)

But I think that the proc speeds should remain congruent between the 15" and the 17". They are both at 1 GHz now, and I think when they bump it, they should bump both. For me, the difference between the 17 and the 15 is form factor really (well, when the 15 AL finally comes out, that is). Some people need the screen, others don't. That and some ports.

... and by the way, its been worth every penny!
[ 15 inch Macbook Pro 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo ][ 20 inch Intel iMac 2 GB RAM / 256 MB ATI XT 1600 ][ iPhone OG (3GS on Reservation)][ White iPod 5th Gen. 60GB ]
     
KeilwerthSX90R
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Washington, D.C.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 03:17 PM
 
Does anyone expect anything other than a speed bump (up to 1.25 Ghz) on the 17" in the next 3 or 4 months?

I know nobody knows and that if I need a laptop now I should buy now but I just want to get the general consensus before I buy.
     
PBAddict
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 03:35 PM
 
I hpe the 17 gets upgraded soon. The PB has been stuck at 1 ghz since november. Apple have got to start delivering on "The Year of the Powerbook" statements
     
domymel
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 03:48 PM
 
My personal dream for the 12" would be the following (but till late summer!):

1 Ghz G4
DVI out (this one even more than a speed bump)
L3 Cache
updated graphics ( 440, FX or new ATI- even though I don�t see them doing this one)
usb2
fire wire 800
super drive x2 burning and dvd-rw capability

that�s it!!!!
     
k2director
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 04:19 PM
 
If anybody had real, hard information about where Motorola stands with their next-gen G4s, it would help with educated guesses....

I remember some people talking about a G4 coming up that uses less heat at 1.2 gig, but don't know re availability.
     
acadian  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Upwind from Quebec...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 05:00 PM
 
Thats the G4e. If they throw the 9600 into the updated 15" and leave the 17" stuck with the GeForce it just wouldnt make any sense.
     
dettociao
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pittsburgh, pa, usa
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2003, 05:00 PM
 
Originally posted by acadian:
12"- 1Ghz G4, 32Mb GeForce
15"- 1.25 Ghz G4e, 64Mb Radeon 9600
17"- 1.4 Ghz G4e, 64Mb Radeon 9600

Yay? Nay? Seems reasonable as the last iteration of the G4 in the Powerbooks until the 980 rears it's pretty head.
These seem like good guesses. No way to tell with apple though.
-.-
12" SuperDrive
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,