|
|
GF4 440 vs ATI9000?
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: somewhere
Status:
Offline
|
|
This is mostly curiousity and will not affect my purchasing decision.
Have tests been performed - which is faster?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
The 9000. It also has better energy conservation & supports vertex shading, which will be useful in the next-gen of games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: somewhere
Status:
Offline
|
|
If the 9000 is faster, why put the 440 in the 17"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
The 9000 is a lot faster and a generation ahead of the MX. But the most important thing is that the 9000 uses less power when playing games or DVDs. Not sure why Apple is so cheap when it comes to graphics chips.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|