|
|
microsoft stealing brushed metal interface?
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: amsterdam
Status:
Offline
|
|
I found this image on tweakers.net. It's actually about the fact that Microsoft is implementing XML structures into filetypes within Windows Longhorn, but this pic scared me. Though it is a .gif, i can definately see some ripping here...who agrees?
pic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by renn:
I found this image on tweakers.net. It's actually about the fact that Microsoft is implementing XML structures into filetypes within Windows Longhorn, but this pic scared me. Though it is a .gif, i can definately see some ripping here...who agrees?
pic
Sad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Brantford, ON. Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by renn:
I found this image on tweakers.net. It's actually about the fact that Microsoft is implementing XML structures into filetypes within Windows Longhorn, but this pic scared me. Though it is a .gif, i can definately see some ripping here...who agrees?
pic
It's just a gradient, there is no brushed texture, the compression just makes it seem that way.
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ya it's obviously a rip-off of safari.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
And the world will give them credit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Scroot:
And the world will give them credit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hamburg
Status:
Offline
|
|
Cool, I think I am going to switch to Windows now!!
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why would they even want to copy brushed metal in the first place???? It's already ugly to begin with and Windows doesn't need more help in the making of an ugly UI department.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Jim Paradise:
Why would they even want to copy brushed metal in the first place???? It's already ugly to begin with and Windows doesn't need more help in the making of an ugly UI department.
amen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: amsterdam
Status:
Offline
|
|
that's just a matter of opinion in my perspective. i'm using plain panther aqua interface 'til omega is released, and works fine for me. it matches my 17" PB. and MS should really be hiring some real graphic designers, cuz to be honest, it's not just a gradient. it's a bad ripoff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Far above Cayuga's waters.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by badidea:
Cool, I think I am going to switch to Windows now!!
take your time with the switch, you have like 5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by d4nth3m4n:
take your time with the switch, you have like 5 years
Given the time frames involved do you really think any UI they show today is anything like what they'll create for the final product?
Don't forget that XP was being shown with Watercolor in development builds and then the XP appearance is what finally ended up in the box.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Status:
Offline
|
|
How is it possible for M$ to *steal* brushed from Apple? Does Apple *own* brushed? Apple sure as hell isn't the first company to use a brushed surface, and I"m sure they won't be the last.
Why do Apple users feel as they they have to play guard-dog for Apple?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Call off the search.
Status:
Offline
|
|
It looks better than Apple's Brushed Metal.
|
the navajo know
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: canadia
Status:
Offline
|
|
research people.
this is not how longhorn will look. the aero interface is under wraps.
|
= decursive =
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vermont
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't think later longhorn builds use this brushed interface, they use the lighter blue version of luna which they call "plex" or something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Mexico
Status:
Offline
|
|
Actually this one is from the PDC build of longhorn, Plex was in an earlier build and then there is another (newer) build which is under wraps that has Aero (white theme with a semi-transparent foreground titlebar\toolbar).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
I recall reading that MS was going to have something like eight or nine different application classifications, possibly all having their own distinct visual style. (I could be wrong about the visual styles but I've seen a few different looks at this point)
Can you imagine that? Mac users think having Aqua and Textured is bad...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Floreeda
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by jessejlt:
How is it possible for M$ to *steal* brushed from Apple? Does Apple *own* brushed? Apple sure as hell isn't the first company to use a brushed surface, and I"m sure they won't be the last.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hamburg
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by d4nth3m4n:
take your time with the switch, you have like 5 years
I was actually thinking about to switch in...hmmm...1000000000000000 years!?
Ok, let`s say never!!!
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
I hope it does come brushed, by that time we would have moved on, and hopefully to a far, far better style.
I think brushed metal is like painting flames on your car and XP currently, well it's the furry dice that hang from the rearview.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Mexico
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apple seems to be adding applications specifications though like with garage band for example. Who knows how many more they will add.
Originally posted by Mike S.:
I recall reading that MS was going to have something like eight or nine different application classifications, possibly all having their own distinct visual style. (I could be wrong about the visual styles but I've seen a few different looks at this point)
Can you imagine that? Mac users think having Aqua and Textured is bad...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Down by the river
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apple should "beta" some butt ugly version of OSX - make it look totally ridiculous. How long until M$ steals it and has the crappiest looking OS ever? I mean, crappier than Windows 95.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|