|
|
Beyonce Knowles Curve (pix) (Page 2)
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, ON
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OAW
A specific response to a specific statement. It's this thing called context.
Don't let it bother you too much, he's probably on a Mac with only one mouse button.
|
The Lord said 'Peter, I can see your house from here.'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Baltimore
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OAW
A specific response to a specific statement. It's this thing called context
When your response is ten quotes down from its target, there's a thing called reply with quote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by KeyLimePi
When your response is ten quotes down from its target, there's a thing called reply with quote.
Indeed. Sort of like this ....
FYI .... now would be the time to quit while you're ahead.
OAW
(
Last edited by OAW; Oct 8, 2014 at 07:25 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
OAW has me rolling in this thread! LOL
Yeah, Beyonce is pretty and all but I'm not really into her. I'm more into the Afrocentric chicks(Badu comes to mind) with the 'fros and locs. A lot of folks front on these kind of women because they are so used to seeing black women with permed/relaxed hair. Not saying that I don't find other types of women attractive it's just the afrocentric ones have a special place with me.
I also have a thing for big haired chicks like Cree Summer.
As far as curves, Serena fades them all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
And another thing, who else found it humourous when the mainstream was acting like J-Lo invented ass?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MallyMal
And another thing, who else found it humourous when the mainstream was acting like J-Lo invented ass?
Yeah that was kind of comical. Black women have had ass like that since the beginning of time but very rarely get any love from the "mainstream" on it. Even amongst Latinas ass like that isn't all that uncommon. When I was in Puerto Rico women who looked just like J-Lo were a dime a dozen. But I will say that here recently with the thong and low-rise jeans in style it appears that even some white girls are getting in on the action. For example, check out Britney Spears here ....
Nice to see that some of the fairer set are starting to recognize the value of not looking like a walking famine victim.
OAW
(
Last edited by OAW; Oct 8, 2014 at 07:25 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by arik
An annoying associate of mine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MallyMal
An annoying associate of mine.
Not really into females with big tats, but other than that she is definitely good eye candy! Of course, my man Maury would probably say that her calves lack curves and I certainly couldn't disagree. I suppose when it comes to "curves", the ideal female form (at least for me) is well-proportioned ... and consists of the standard "hour-glass" shape from the front view which has the boobs, small waist, and hips ..... a certain "symmetry" or "balance" from the side view where the boobs extend from the chest to a similar degree that the ass extends from the lower back .... and finally a "shapeliness" to the legs where the thighs and the calves are well-defined. Now of course, the vast majority of women aren't built like that otherwise a "10" (or a "dime" as the brothers often say) would be more like "3" because they would be so commonplace. Most have some of those qualities and lack others, so it then boils down to personal preference. And as I've said before ... when it comes down to a choice, I and others with similar tastes will go for ass vs. boobs and hips/thighs vs. calves. So a female like the one you posted would turn my head before the skinny "model type" that we typically see Hollywood promoting.
OAW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, if I saw that in person I'd quickly ask her to puh-LEEEEZE cover it all up for the love of heaven, my eyesight, and stomach.
That girl's WAAAAY too thunder-chunky for me. But again...to each his own.
Maury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
Yeah, if I saw that in person I'd quickly ask her to puh-LEEEEZE cover it all up for the love of heaven, my eyesight, and stomach.
That girl's WAAAAY too thunder-chunky for me. But again...to each his own.
Maury
LOL .... yeah I figured you'd say as much. The thing is she doesn't look very tall and given her build I would estimate that she is probably 125 - 130 lbs max. Definitely not a big girl at all. But I suppose MallyMal would know if I'm in the ballpark on that.
But as they say, there is somebody for everybody. After all, skinny white girls need love too!
But for those of use who prefer real "curves", here's another shining example. The incomparable Melyssa Ford .....
Now that's what I'm talking about!
OAW
(
Last edited by OAW; Oct 8, 2014 at 07:26 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OAW
LOL .... yeah I figured you'd say as much.
I'm more of an Elizabeth Hurley/Ashley Scott/Mia Kirshner kinda guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Oakland, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OAW
Now that's what I'm talking about!
OAW
A REAL woman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OAW
Not really into females with big tats...
Then you should see her other thigh.
Originally Posted by OAW
I suppose when it comes to "curves", the ideal female form (at least for me) is well-proportioned ... and consists of the standard "hour-glass" shape from the front view which has the boobs, small waist, and hips
Yeah, I wasn't really posting the pic above to say she is my ideal. She could be though. I was mostly posting her pic because I find her attractive(but still annoying ) and because I was speaking earlier about the chicks with locs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OAW
LOL .... yeah I figured you'd say as much. The thing is she doesn't look very tall and given her build I would estimate that she is probably 125 - 130 lbs max. Definitely not a big girl at all. But I suppose MallyMal would know if I'm in the ballpark on that.
She's like 5'7, 135.
Bangin!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Another, this is an associate of a photographer friend. Just another person I find attractive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OAW
Not really into females with big tats, but other than that she is definitely good eye candy! Of course, my man Maury would probably say that her calves lack curves and I certainly couldn't disagree. I suppose when it comes to "curves", the ideal female form (at least for me) is well-proportioned ... and consists of the standard "hour-glass" shape from the front view which has the boobs, small waist, and hips ..... a certain "symmetry" or "balance" from the side view where the boobs extend from the chest to a similar degree that the ass extends from the lower back .... and finally a "shapeliness" to the legs where the thighs and the calves are well-defined. Now of course, the vast majority of women aren't built like that otherwise a "10" (or a "dime" as the brothers often say) would be more like "3" because they would be so commonplace. Most have some of those qualities and lack others, so it then boils down to personal preference. And as I've said before ... when it comes down to a choice, I and others with similar tastes will go for ass vs. boobs and hips/thighs vs. calves. So a female like the one you posted would turn my head before the skinny "model type" that we typically see Hollywood promoting.
OAW
i agree with you, she must have proportioned body....
__________________________
www.beyoncenow.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
OK, that's it -- I can't come back here any longer...need...more...skinny...chicks...need...ri bs...visible...need...pointy...knees...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
need...pointy...knees...
LMAO!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Baltimore
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OAW
Now that's what I'm talking about!
OAW
I stand corrected. It seems you do look at girls above the waist afterall!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Those girls are chunky. No thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cipher13
Those girls are chunky. No thanks.
Just out of curiosity ... define "chunky". At least as far as you are concerned.
OAW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OAW
Just out of curiosity ... define "chunky". At least as far as you are concerned.
OAW
Chunky = the girls in the pics you posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
(
Last edited by RAILhead; Jun 8, 2005 at 02:09 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jan 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OAW
Yeah she is quite the goddess. I remember when her stock went way up when she wore this little number ....
Now that is what you call curves!
OAW
So ugly it hurts to look.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by meelk
So ugly it hurts to look.
Tell me about it. We have guys guys in the field building scaffolds and insulating piping that look just like her. :shudder:
Maury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
(I'm weeping she's so hawt)
Yeah you definitely like them on the slimmer side overall. Even though they are front shots I can tell by their body types that none of them have any ass to speak of whatsoever and are probably sporting a B-cup at best in the boob department. Now they are most definitely very pretty ... and certainly wouldn't get kicked out of bed ... but given a choice between them or Melyssa Ford they wouldn't get a second look. This thread is about curves ... and without question they are somewhat "deficient" in that department. And since this is about curves, Melyssa Ford doesn't have the nickname "Jessica Rabbit" for nothing ....
OAW
(
Last edited by OAW; Oct 8, 2014 at 07:26 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by meelk
So ugly it hurts to look.
Whether Serena is pretty in the face is a subject of intense debate. Some find her attractive ... some don't. In all fairness though, when she's out on the court with her hair pulled back and no makeup in the heat of battle ... well, suffice it to say that she isn't looking her best at such times. Having said that, the subject is curves ... and without a doubt she has that. That last girl my man Maury posted above ... the one showing her "hip" ... or should I say her pelvic bone .... looks like a borderline anorexic in dire need of a ham sandwich or something! Serena is the antithesis of that .... and it's a beautiful thing!
Some shots of Serena all "dolled up". And if this is what a "construction worker" looks like nowadays then I'll be the first in line to get next to her ....
And back to the subject of curves ... this was an interesting shot ....
.... and to drive the point home we have .....
Boobs, small waist, ass ... all well-proportioned. No signs of ribs and collar bones and pelvic bones poking through her skin. No visions of Sally Struthers popping up saying ....
::::: begin shaky, whiny little voice :::::
"Please send your gift today to help feed a starving model!"
:::::end shaky, whiny little voice ::::::
OAW
(
Last edited by OAW; Oct 8, 2014 at 07:25 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: New York City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Put me in the curve camp -- when they look like boys it's kind of creepy. I like OAW's breakdown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Yorktown, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
"I'm virtually bursting with adequatulence!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by iLikebeer
Shakira needs to make a movie appearance just so she can win that list every year. Nobody beats her when it comes to curves, especially when she starts swinging her hips. Yum
Yum!
Search pictures of Shakira in images.google.com and you will see she kind of looks like Fred Savage.
(
Last edited by The Godfather; Jun 24, 2005 at 05:43 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well since this thread got resurrected I thought I'd present who may very well be the finest woman walking! The absolutely stunning former Miss USA ..... Kenya Moore:
Now what you know about that?
OAW
(
Last edited by OAW; Oct 8, 2014 at 07:24 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Where Lysimachia mauritiana blooms
Status:
Offline
|
|
there's got to be a way to quantitate curves from images no?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Oakland, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
OAW you have good taste man. The supermodel chicks lacking the rear package in here earlier wasn't working for me. You have restored order to this thread. Keep them coming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by exca1ibur
OAW you have good taste man. The supermodel chicks lacking the rear package in here earlier wasn't working for me. You have restored order to this thread. Keep them coming.
Well if you insist.
Let's start of with the beautiful Tiara ....
And then we can toss in a little Latina flavor with the gorgeous Vida Guerra ...
Have I proven my point yet? Or does my man Maury's position still have co-signers?
OAW
(
Last edited by OAW; Oct 8, 2014 at 07:24 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
Chunky = the girls in the pics you posted.
Chunky = you walk into the bathroom while they're sitting on the toilet and you can't actually see any of the toilet seat.
Originally Posted by RAILhead
...pics of Helena...
Well said that man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: A couple of stones from the sun.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Everybody Knowles that gurl got'em some serious-ass chunky fries on her...
.
|
Simple Empire...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vente: Achat
Status:
Offline
|
|
edit: actually I likes me them curves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|