Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > World is a safer place despite people's fears

World is a safer place despite people's fears
Thread Tools
moki
Ambrosia - el Presidente
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2005, 02:44 AM
 
Don't worry... be happy...

from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.../ixportal.html

.....

World is a safer place despite people's fears

By Francis Harris in Washington

(Filed: 19/10/2005)

Widespread fears about a world in a perpetual state of war are unfounded, a study says today. It emphasises that the number of conflicts between nations, civil wars, battle deaths, coups and genocides has been falling steeply for more than a decade.

While the authors note that bloody wars continue in Iraq, Afghanistan and Congo, they argue that there are substantial grounds for optimism.

The first Human Security Report, written by academics led by Andrew Mack, of the University of British Columbia, cites popular notions that war is becoming more common and deadlier, that genocide is rising and that terrorism poses the greatest threat to humanity.

"Not one of these claims is based on reliable data," it says. "All are suspect; some are demonstrably false. Yet they are widely believed because they reinforce popular assumptions."

The authors say there are 40 per cent fewer armed conflicts than in the early 1990s. Between 1991 and last year 28 wars for self-determination began but 43 were ended or contained.

In 1992, when the Yugoslav wars of secession began, there were 51 state-based conflicts around the world. The figure dropped to 32 in 2002 and 29 in 2003. The arms trade declined by a third from 1990 to 2003 and the number of refugees fell by 45 per cent between 1992 and 2003.

In 1950 each conflict killed 38,000 people on average. By 2002 that had dropped to 600.

However, the report, which was funded by five nations including Britain, says that the potential for a major upsurge in violence remains.

"The risk of new wars breaking out or old ones resuming is very real in the absence of a sustained and strengthened commitment to conflict prevention and post-conflict peace-building," the authors say.

Most of the data gathered ended in 2003, the last full year for which statistics were available. That means that most of the deaths caused by the war in Iraq are not included. But by the standards of the bloodiest conflicts since the end of the Second World War, the deaths in Iraq are relatively few. About 27,000 Iraqis and Americans have died.

Major conflicts of the past 60 years, including Algeria, Korea, Vietnam, Congo and Sudan have killed between 400,000 and two million.

Prof Mack, an Australian former United Nations official, attributes much of the success in ending conflict to UN peacekeeping operations.

The reduction in war is also attributable to the end of the Cold War, he says. From 1945 to 1989, many local conflicts were aggravated by the intervention of the two great power blocs.
Andrew Welch / el Presidente / Ambrosia Software, Inc.
     
Troll
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2005, 04:16 AM
 
Yawn. We've known for years that terrorism and armed conflict have been on the decline for decades and we've known for years that terrorism is not the greatest threat to humanity.

That's precisely what's so absurd about the most powerful nation on earth dedicating most of its resources to combatting terrorism through war. It's also what's so absurd about the claim that the various wars that power has conducted of late have made the world safer.
( Last edited by Troll; Oct 20, 2005 at 05:47 AM. )
     
moki  (op)
Ambrosia - el Presidente
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2005, 08:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by Troll
That's precisely what's so absurd about the most powerful nation on earth dedicating most of its resources to combatting terrorism through war. It's also what's so absurd about the claim that the various wars that power has conducted of late have made the world safer.
It's an interesting view, but it's rather an oxymoron. Either the USA is a nation powerful enough to effect the world (as many people say with a bit of angst), or its not a party to anything that's happening. You're welcome to believe that things like WWII, the Korean War, the Cold War, and the current wars would have "worked out by themselves" without our intervention... but I think that's more than a little bit silly to believe.
Andrew Welch / el Presidente / Ambrosia Software, Inc.
     
OldManMac
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I don't know anymore!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2005, 09:46 PM
 
It is not an "either/or" situation. The world is not in black and white. Most of the wars we've been involved in this century we didn't start, and the results were more positive than negative. We did start an unjustified war in Iraq, and the results will be negative. Through constant repetition of the word "terrorists," GWB and his minions have scared the hell out of a lot of people unnecessarily, and many of those people are now starting to realize that they were duped.
Why is there always money for war, but none for education?
     
Pendergast
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2005, 10:01 PM
 
Originally Posted by KarlG
It is not an "either/or" situation. The world is not in black and white. Most of the wars we've been involved in this century we didn't start, and the results were more positive than negative. We did start an unjustified war in Iraq, and the results will be negative. Through constant repetition of the word "terrorists," GWB and his minions have scared the hell out of a lot of people unnecessarily, and many of those people are now starting to realize that they were duped.
I don't think that is what he meant.

I think what he is saying is that without the U.S., the world would be chaos and would all either speak Korean, one of the Chinese languages, of German, or all of them at once, and be Muslim extremists at the same time.
"Criticism is a misconception: we must read not to understand others but to understand ourselves.”

Emile M. Cioran
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,