![](_gb_images/_gb_sitenav_spacer.gif) |
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
New Daughter Card
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Seattle
Status:
Offline
|
|
If I'm not mistaken the current lineup of PowerMacs (and many previous models) use a daughter card to mount the PowerPC chip. What I am wondering is just how hard it would be to provide a new daughter card using a future Intel chip? I'm especially curious about the current lineup of PowerMacs. Does anybody have any insight as to the possibilities?
![bicker](http://forums.macnn.com/images/smilies/argue.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
Moderator Emeritus ![](stars/star_5_stds9_combadge.png)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's possible, but the number of work arounds required to make it function properly would probably be prohibitive. You've gotta take into account the fact that the motherboard was designed around and for the PowerPC architecture. So there'd be a number of things about the motherboard's architecture that a swapped in x86 CPU would either not be capable of accessing or have trouble doing.
What I'd expect is something along the lines of a PCIe 'PC' card. A card that would feature an x86 CPU and all the necesarry chips and ROMs for it to function as a secondary processor for doing things like running x86-native software.
I'm doing more than expecting it, actually, I'm counting on it. I have every intention of buying the of last G5 Power Macs (if this revision should so be it) and using it for several years (5-10). First, until the PowerPC native software begins to dry up, and then beyond that with an secondary x86 processor.
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
|
|
|
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm with Lateralus that swapping the G5 for an Intel chip would be nearly impossible.
However, I don't think we'll see PCIe cards with Intel chips on them. Any chip on that card would be more starved for bandwidth than the early 400Mhz FSB Pentium 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
There are a lot of G5's out there. I believe it is within reason that some other mother board manufacture out there figures out what is so special about the Apple Intel mother boards and clones them. This is a big PC market. It’s only a matter of time before it hits the Mac.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by t500
There are a lot of G5's out there. I believe it is within reason that some other mother board manufacture out there figures out what is so special about the Apple Intel mother boards and clones them. This is a big PC market. It’s only a matter of time before it hits the Mac.
On the same idea, I think we're more likely to see (3rd party Intel CPU compatible) motherboards with the right layout and screw positions for the PMG5 case rather than CPU swaps or CPUs on PCIe cards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
Moderator ![](stars/star_5_hbar_blue.png)
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
This would amount to designing a bridge chip which mediates between Intel's cpu bus and IBM's interconnect for the PPC970. Also, throttling the cpu, decreasing the core voltage and/or frequency would be difficult to say the least. Technically, I guess it's feasible, but I doubt the performance would be great either. I also doubt it would be cheap. Lastly the drivers had to be modified (since I doubt the drivers for all components on a motherboard for the G5 have been included for the x86).
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
Moderator Emeritus ![](stars/star_5_stds9_combadge.png)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mduell
However, I don't think we'll see PCIe cards with Intel chips on them. Any chip on that card would be more starved for bandwidth than the early 400Mhz FSB Pentium 4.
There's already precedent for PCs-on-PCI cards for the Mac.
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
|
|
|
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hummm, I was thinking about an entire mother board swap. No retro fitting... New computer, same sexy case
Yeah it will be a 3rd party that does it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
Moderator Emeritus ![](stars/star_5_stds9_combadge.png)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mduell
However, I don't think we'll see PCIe cards with Intel chips on them. Any chip on that card would be more starved for bandwidth than the early 400Mhz FSB Pentium 4.
There's already precedent for PCs-on-PCI cards for the Mac.
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
|
|
|
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
|
|
![](_gb_images/_img_misc/_gb_mb_previousthread-off.gif)
|
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
Forum Rules
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
![](_gb_images/_gb_clear.gif) |
|
![](_gb_images/_gb_sitenav_spacer.gif) |