 |
 |
WebObjects born again?
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
If WebObjests were to go open source would it have a fighting chance to become a major player amongst the other technologies like JSP and PHP?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
There's already an open-source clone out there called GNUStepWeb, but it doesn't seem to have fared all that well. I doubt the story would be any different if the "real" WebObjects were to go open-source.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Millennium
There's already an open-source clone out there called GNUStepWeb, but it doesn't seem to have fared all that well. I doubt the story would be any different if the "real" WebObjects were to go open-source.
I agree. Too clunky, too proprietary, too inapplicable to other situations.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
In another discussion I've heard the developing WO with tools based on Eclipse/Java, does have some merits. Some of the other developers are also highly recommending RoR any comments on those?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've heard good things about Ruby on Rails (RoR), and my webhost does offer it. Maybe I'll try it out.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top