|
|
M-Audio soundcard in my dual 3.0ghz Mac Pro
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Will it work, and are there any problems with these soundcards?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Negative.
The M-Audio is a PCI card. The Mac Pro only has PCIe slots.
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Damn...
Are there any that will work?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
buy a mbox 2 MINI or perhaps a mbox 2 Or PRO for that matter they are not that much more expensive and come with pro tools M powered to learn on, and it is powerful enough to do decent EP's
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
the mini is kickass.. if you dont need more than 2 channels, its more than enough
|
Hear and download my debut EP 'Ice Pictures' for free here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
How do these things connect to the computer to accept the sound inputs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cincinnati, Oh
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by silverflyer
How do these things connect to the computer to accept the sound inputs?
USB.
|
20" iMac/2.4 C2D/4GB RAM/320 HD + ViewSonic VX2025WM
13" MBP/2.26 C2D/4GB RAM/250 HD
16 GB iPhone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why not the:
Optical digital audio input and output Toslink ports
or
Analog stereo line-level input and output minijacks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by silverflyer
Why not the:
Optical digital audio input and output Toslink ports
or
Analog stereo line-level input and output minijacks
Then you're using the existing built-in "soundcard" of the Mac. You're not replacing the soundcard as your first post suggested you wanted to. The digital and analog outputs come out from the on-board souncard. If you want to replace that you'd want to use a PCI-Express card (there are none), a firewire device, or a USB device.
|
Mac Pro Dual 3.0 Dual-Core
MacBook Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
There are several PCIe cards that work with the Mac Pro's. These tend to be professional solutions with a corresponding price tag.
I'm using the MOTU 424e and 2408 combo. It works flawlessly. There are also solutions from Digidesign and others. PCI-based hardware still offers the lowest latency solution.
If you're a 'pro', avoid Firewire solutions that are 'class compliant', i.e. that use Apple's generic Firewire driver, or you'll have a random (latency) offset to deal with. Tedious.
Post a little more info on what you require, and we'll do our best to help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Here is what I want to do.
I store all my music on my mac at 192kbps compression, I play it through my stereo and enjoy listening to it. When I had my G5 I had an M-Audio soundcard in it to provide a higher quality sound. I am looking for a way to replicate that. I am not creating music, or authoring tracks, or anything like that. I simply want good quality sound out of this thing, better than the onboard sound can provide.
When I want to get really high quality sound, I simply go get the CD out and play it that way, but I dont do that all the time.
edit: I paid a lot of money for stereo components and speakers, I can tell the difference when plugged into this mac now compared to the G5 and M-Audio soundcard I had before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, the latest dual-core G5's have vastly improved burr-brown analogue output circuitry, quite possibly on a par with, or better than the M•Audio hardware.
I would say that as you're into hi-fi (rather than 'pro-audio' recording on your Mac) and if the on-board audio is really not good enough (in my opinion the reduced fidelity of 192K mp3's compared with AIF or ALC means that built-in audio will be more than good enough) consider using the Mac's digital output connected to an external D/A converter. Hi-fi buffs spend silly money on D/A's. Actually, hi fi buffs spend silly money period!
Or, if you really want a soundcard solution, consider one from PreSonus, such as the Inspire, which offer very good sound quality, especially at the price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by booboo
Well, the latest dual-core G5's have vastly improved burr-brown analogue output circuitry, quite possibly on a par with, or better than the M•Audio hardware.
I would say that as you're into hi-fi (rather than 'pro-audio' recording on your Mac) and if the on-board audio is really not good enough (in my opinion the reduced fidelity of 192K mp3's compared with AIF or ALC means that built-in audio will be more than good enough) consider using the Mac's digital output connected to an external D/A converter. Hi-fi buffs spend silly money on D/A's. Actually, hi fi buffs spend silly money period!
Or, if you really want a soundcard solution, consider one from PreSonus, such as the Inspire, which offer very good sound quality, especially at the price.
true, I do spend silly money on my Stereo/speakers. It is worth it though. What I use my mac for is normal every day listening, not the times I want to put my ears and speakers to the test. And you are right, the quality loss is noticeable. It was less noticeable though with the M-Audio soundcard.
I will look into the direct connection through the digital output directly into my stereo equipment.
edit: I actually compress into apples AAC format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
I also think an external DAC is the best option. Or feed the optical out into a high-end system.
Side note: 192kbps AAC isn't too bad at all. It's what I use for portable music (lossless on the main home rig). Honestly even with very expensive equipment it's hard for me to hear the difference.
--Chris
|
Current: iMac 20" 2.4/4/320 / iMac G4 800
Portable: iPhone 3G White/16 / 12" PowerBook 1.5/1.25/80
Former: PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8 / iBook G3 700 / PM 7500, 3G iPod 10GB, 5.5G iPod 30GB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by silverflyer
true, I do spend silly money on my Stereo/speakers. It is worth it though. What I use my mac for is normal every day listening, not the times I want to put my ears and speakers to the test. And you are right, the quality loss is noticeable. It was less noticeable though with the M-Audio soundcard.
If the loss of quality between CD and 192kbps AAC is LESS noticeable on the M-Audio soundcard, that is an absolutely sure sign that the audio hardware you're listening on NOW is BETTER.
Unless you've been messing up badly, if you've been investing in hi-fi equipment in any sensible way, you should have noticed that the better the system, the more obvious a crappy source becomes.
I've found that the better my components become, the more I find myself weeding out records that simply aren't up to snuff (in most cases, of course, the music itself still makes them worth keeping - though I've had a bunch of albums that simply fell apart musically after upgrading the turntable, for example).
And on my studio audio interface, the difference between 192kbps compressed audio and uncompressed is *very* apparent. At 320kbps, it becomes negligible, but I rip anything for my collection into lossless, and lossless only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
the hotest interface for the mac is the TC electronic Konnekt24, it has the best pre amps, and onboard TC quality DSP with 2 headphones out "GREAT FOR HOME RECORDING" and an analog level pot, its not the cheapest $500 but it beats interfaces with 10 times its price in terms of quality.
http://www.tcelectronic.com/Konnekt24D
www.tcelectronic.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
analogika makes a very good point re the limitations of the source signal.
Basharar must have bought himself a Konnekt24 for Xmas and now wants to share his enthusiasm.
However, dedicated D/A is the simplest and quality-conscious route.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New York City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why don't you just use Digital Output to your home system.
On a side note.. the on board sound on most Macs is just about as good as any PCI or PCIe card you're going to find. I would only recommend a sound card if you are going to do professional recording.. If that were the case... sound cards aren't the way to go anymore. a Professional FireWire mixer is all that you really need.
Soundcards are becoming obsolete... even on PC's I said that ten years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, I decided one thing for sure, I am buying a 500gb drive and using it solely for music. I am going to re-rip my music at a loss-less bitrate.
i am not doing any recording, I think that this, TC electronic Konnekt24, and all other similar things might just be overkill.
Are there any benefits to it for listening only?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think soundcards, especially on the PC, still have their place in gaming systems doing what they ahve always done, and thats take load off the processor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
These days, basic sound I/O has neglible load implications for the PC.
Professional PCI cards do have one advantage over Firewire equivalents - an advantage that is entirely irrelevant here - they offer the lowest latency.
The sould quality for silverfiver's purposes are solely down to the quality of the D/A (digital to analogue) conversion. The TC card does a whole heap of things which are of absolutely no use to you.
Just pay for a decent D/A converter and save to a lossless format (ALC for example) in future.
If you're really serious you'll also want to use a ripper (i.e. not iTunes) that incorporates full error checking, such as xACT. However you may need a supported CD reader, which means you'll be glad of the extra 5.25" bay in the Mac Pro . . . .
P.S. Oh look, it took me nearly six years, but I finally got addicted . . .
It all depends how serious you are . . . . ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by silverflyer
This only converts one kind of digital to another. You need something (presumably) that converts digital to analog. Or maybe you don't...
What exactly are you trying to hook your Mac to again? Does your receiver have optical digital input? If so, you just need a digital optical (aka Toslink) cable. Anything in the digital domain will be unaffected by which soundcard you have (Mac digital output is bit-for-bit exactly what's in the source -- CD, MP3, whatever) so it's not worth it to have one.
Depending on your receiver, you might want a better DAC (digital to analog converter). That's a different question altogether.
--Chris
|
Current: iMac 20" 2.4/4/320 / iMac G4 800
Portable: iPhone 3G White/16 / 12" PowerBook 1.5/1.25/80
Former: PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8 / iBook G3 700 / PM 7500, 3G iPod 10GB, 5.5G iPod 30GB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just to give an idea of what I am plugging this into, here is what I am using.
speakers: HiFi & Home Cinema Speakers - Bowers & Wilkins United Kingdom
Hi-Fi equipment.
tuner
Rotel manufactures home theater, hi fi and multi-room audio systems for audiophiles and videophiles including stereo receivers, surround sound processors, DVD players, multi-channel amplifiers and custom installations.
CD player
Rotel manufactures home theater, hi fi and multi-room audio systems for audiophiles and videophiles including stereo receivers, surround sound processors, DVD players, multi-channel amplifiers and custom installations.
reciever
Rotel manufactures home theater, hi fi and multi-room audio systems for audiophiles and videophiles including stereo receivers, surround sound processors, DVD players, multi-channel amplifiers and custom installations.
Amp
Rotel manufactures home theater, hi fi and multi-room audio systems for audiophiles and videophiles including stereo receivers, surround sound processors, DVD players, multi-channel amplifiers and custom installations.
Pre-amp
Rotel manufactures home theater, hi fi and multi-room audio systems for audiophiles and videophiles including stereo receivers, surround sound processors, DVD players, multi-channel amplifiers and custom installations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am going to re-rip some CDs and then connect straight through with the Toslink and see how I like that, if it works well, then I am done.
edit: scratch that, it appears my reciever does not have a toslink input.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by silverflyer
Just to give an idea of what I am plugging this into, here is what I am using.
Ahh, OK. Now I see. It doesn't appear your receiver has digital inputs. You probably are looking for a DAC.
Rotel doesn't seem to manufacture a DAC anymore. There are lots out there. One I like that is inexpensive but sounds great is the Entech Number Cruncher, out of production but often available on E-bay.
--Chris
|
Current: iMac 20" 2.4/4/320 / iMac G4 800
Portable: iPhone 3G White/16 / 12" PowerBook 1.5/1.25/80
Former: PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8 / iBook G3 700 / PM 7500, 3G iPod 10GB, 5.5G iPod 30GB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
One more thing I noticed, Konnect does not seem to support Intel Macs, which would mean I cant use that either.
Answer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
I also have edited my signature, lol.
|
Mac Pro Dual Quad 3.2ghz, 4gb ram, 4x 1 Terabyte hdd's, 8800GT, 30inch Samsung display running OSX Leopard Server
15 inch Macbook Pro Unibody and Apple 24 inch LED Display.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Urbandale, IA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Mmmm...B&W speakers. Yummy.
|
"Yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation" yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just a thought, but with something like the Konnect 24d, would it be possible to record some of my vinyl albums to my computer and then to a cd?
I would really like to do that so they last longer.
|
Mac Pro Dual Quad 3.2ghz, 4gb ram, 4x 1 Terabyte hdd's, 8800GT, 30inch Samsung display running OSX Leopard Server
15 inch Macbook Pro Unibody and Apple 24 inch LED Display.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Mmmm...B&W speakers. Yummy.
Indeed, I love these things.
by the way, I love your sig.
|
Mac Pro Dual Quad 3.2ghz, 4gb ram, 4x 1 Terabyte hdd's, 8800GT, 30inch Samsung display running OSX Leopard Server
15 inch Macbook Pro Unibody and Apple 24 inch LED Display.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by silverflyer
Just a thought, but with something like the Konnect 24d, would it be possible to record some of my vinyl albums to my computer and then to a cd?
To make it worthwhile you would need one helluva good turntable, and a phono/RIAA-curve amp. Unless the LP hasn't been released on CD, I'd just buy the CD if you want a digital version -- it's a lot cheaper unless you have many hundreds to do.
--Chris
|
Current: iMac 20" 2.4/4/320 / iMac G4 800
Portable: iPhone 3G White/16 / 12" PowerBook 1.5/1.25/80
Former: PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8 / iBook G3 700 / PM 7500, 3G iPod 10GB, 5.5G iPod 30GB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
What I have is an album that is out of print and never released in the US, recorded in 1963 and as far as I know, never released on CD.
(
Last edited by silverflyer; Jan 16, 2007 at 02:09 AM.
)
|
Mac Pro Dual Quad 3.2ghz, 4gb ram, 4x 1 Terabyte hdd's, 8800GT, 30inch Samsung display running OSX Leopard Server
15 inch Macbook Pro Unibody and Apple 24 inch LED Display.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Basharar
the hotest interface for the mac is the TC electronic Konnekt24, it has the best pre amps, and onboard TC quality DSP with 2 headphones out "GREAT FOR HOME RECORDING" and an analog level pot, its not the cheapest $500 but it beats interfaces with 10 times its price in terms of quality.
*ahem* - no: http://www.mhlabs.com/metric_halo/products/mio/uln2/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by booboo
that thing looks nice.
Are they sold in the US?
$13,500.00 US
HOLY SMOKES!
(
Last edited by silverflyer; Jan 17, 2007 at 07:56 PM.
)
|
Mac Pro Dual Quad 3.2ghz, 4gb ram, 4x 1 Terabyte hdd's, 8800GT, 30inch Samsung display running OSX Leopard Server
15 inch Macbook Pro Unibody and Apple 24 inch LED Display.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by booboo
Hehe - the website mentions Bob Katz, mastering engineer.
Both Bob Katz and Barry Diament (the guy who remastered the entire Bob Marley catalogue, among hundreds of other high-profile productions) use Metric Halo Mobile I/O ULN-2 units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|