Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

Doofy · Jul 30, 2007, 02:10 PM

Right then Dakara...

I'll bet my entire collection of 12th century marble and gold chess sets that that's Rena Sofer, capped from an ep of season 6 of 24.

Rumor · Jul 30, 2007, 02:11 PM

Dak Dak Dak Daaaaak

Do not run, we are your friends.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 02:12 PM

I guess my file name wasn't helpful enough.

Somehow I knew this would garner attention this morning. Good choice of sig, I guess.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 02:12 PM

Originally Posted by Rumor

Dak Dak Dak Daaaaak

Do not run, we are your friends.

You post that entire sequence everytime you address me, and I'll be fine with it.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 02:14 PM

Originally Posted by Doofy

Right then Dakara...

That no longer applies.

Rumor · Jul 30, 2007, 02:14 PM

Originally Posted by Doofy

Right then Dakara...

I'll bet my entire collection of 12th century marble and gold chess sets that that's Rena Sofer, capped from an ep of season 6 of 24.

Boy, those shipping charges are going to be expensive.

She played a prostitue in Old Town that betrayed the girls to the mob. I believe her name is Alexis Bledel.

Doofy · 02:21 PM

Come on then Dak Dak Dak Daaaaak, tell us who the chick is.

Edit: No need, Rumor told us.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 02:15 PM

That would be correct. Not that I've had a chance to see the movie.

Chuckit · Jul 30, 2007, 02:17 PM

Dude, I totally didn't guess Rory Gilmore. I feel ashamed.

turtle777 · Jul 30, 2007, 02:18 PM

Originally Posted by Dakarʒ

People really need to stop calling me Dak.

D'ACCORD

-t

Kevin · Jul 30, 2007, 02:19 PM

Originally Posted by sek929

As Doofy would say.....

Kevin. panties. unwad.

Doof would never say that to me. Cause Doof knows I am a pretty easy going guy. People tend to make up personalities for people they really don't know on IRC and then when they read said post of said person, they also give them a way they think they respond. Which from what I have seen in here, and not just with me, it usually off.

I assure you sek, nothing you've said in this thread, or any has gotten my panties in a wad.

I use starch when I wear panties.

Did you miss the green smiley face with the huge grin and/or the purposeful redneck misspelling of the sentence preceding it?

Obviously I noticed it. That was what the passive/agressive comment was about.

I know better than to start a futile argument with you, I just threw out some bait....and, of course, you snapped it right up

See, more passive aggressivenessness.

And I've told the forum for years that if anyone posts in reply to a post of mine, or posts a post about me, that I will indeed feel obligated to respond. So if you do any above it's a pretty good indication I will respond. Why? Because I've been saying as much for years.

Oh and

Doofy · Jul 30, 2007, 02:20 PM

Originally Posted by Rumor

Boy, those shipping charges are going to be expensive.

Not really. I don't actually have a collection of 12th century chess sets.

Originally Posted by Rumor

She played a prostitue in Old Town that betrayed the girls to the mob. I believe her name is Alexis Bledel.

You can see where I'm coming from though, right?

http://www.imdb.com/gallery/granitz/...%20Rena&seq=15

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 02:21 PM

Originally Posted by turtle777

D'ACCORD

-t

Now you people just aren't trying![/false exasperation]

Edit: I see it took Kevin nine lines to show how unwadded his panties are.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 02:23 PM

Originally Posted by Doofy

Not really. I don't actually have a collection of 12th century chess sets.

You can see where I'm coming from though, right?

Rena Sofer Photos

Yes, the basic features are there, blue eyes, dark hair, thin eyebrows. Not sure she'd look young enough though.

I also had no idea who you referring to until now. I know her from Ed, I believe.

Rumor · Jul 30, 2007, 02:24 PM

Originally Posted by Doofy

Not really. I don't actually have a collection of 12th century chess sets.

False advertisment!

Originally Posted by Doofy

You can see where I'm coming from though, right?

Rena Sofer Photos

I can see the similarity there. Though her eyes are a bit more almond shaped than the girl in the sig. Not by much though.

Kevin · Jul 30, 2007, 02:26 PM

Originally Posted by Dakarʒ

Edit: I see it took Kevin nine lines to show how unwadded his panties are.

What does the amount of lines have to do with anything Dak?

KeriVit · Jul 30, 2007, 02:26 PM

Originally Posted by Kevin

Doof would never say that to me. Cause Doof knows I am a pretty easy going guy. People tend to make up personalities for people they really don't know on IRC and then when they read said post of said person, they also give them a way they think they respond. Which from what I have seen in here, and not just with me, it usually off.

I assure you sek, nothing you've said in this thread, or any has gotten my panties in a wad.

I use starch when I wear panties.

Obviously I noticed it. That was what the passive/agressive comment was about.

See, more passive aggressivenessness.

And I've told the forum for years that if anyone posts in reply to a post of mine, or posts a post about me, that I will indeed feel obligated to respond. So if you do any above it's a pretty good indication I will respond. Why? Because I've been saying as much for years.

Oh and

Oh please stop.

Can't you just say "nananana-booboo" or "aw, shaddap" and move on?

besson3c · Jul 30, 2007, 02:26 PM

Well, it's not Regis.

Doofy · Jul 30, 2007, 02:28 PM

Originally Posted by Dakarʒ

Yes, the basic features are there, blue eyes, dark hair, thin eyebrows. Not sure she'd look young enough though.

To be fair, the chick in your sig looks mid-30s to me.
Watch season 6 of 24 and you'll see exactly what I mean (Jack's sister in law).

Originally Posted by Dakarʒ

I also had no idea who you referring to until now. I know her from Ed, I believe.

Yep. That's her.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 02:28 PM

Originally Posted by Kevin

What does the amount of lines have to do with anything Dak?

Don't think I didn't notice what you did there. That's considered baiting. Be warned.

Kevin · Jul 30, 2007, 02:29 PM

Originally Posted by KeriVit

Oh please stop.

Can't you just say "nananana-booboo" or "aw, shaddap" and move on?

I would tell KeriVit that maybe he needs to take his own advice.

It has nothing to do with you, yet you've just added to it making it even more obnoxious that it already was. Good job.

Originally Posted by Dakarʒ

Don't think I didn't notice what you did there. That's considered baiting. Be warned.

Baiting?

I am warned! I sure am.

Then sek will tell you to get your panties out of a knot, and the cycle will be complete!

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 02:30 PM

Originally Posted by Doofy

To be fair, the chick in your sig looks mid-30s to me.

That's completely fair. A 200x50 sig isn't an exact science. That one sig you had a long time back looked like Jamie Gertz to me (Which is way more random).

KeriVit · Jul 30, 2007, 02:35 PM

Originally Posted by Kevin

I would tell KeriVit that maybe he needs to take his own advice.

OK, I didn't know I was starting anything. Geez.

So, nanananaboobooo... byebye.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 02:40 PM

Originally Posted by Kevin

Baiting?

That's what they said about ca$h calling Railroader Kilbey.

Kevin · Jul 30, 2007, 02:40 PM

Originally Posted by KeriVit

OK, I didn't know I was starting anything. Geez.

So, nanananaboobooo... byebye.

I as just saying your post just added to the silly obnoxiousness. That is all.

No hard feeling KeriVit. *kisses*

besson3c · Jul 30, 2007, 02:50 PM

Dakar3: Is Kevin mocking you or being condescending? What a MacNN bully!

Chuckit · Jul 30, 2007, 02:57 PM

Originally Posted by Doofy

To be fair, the chick in your sig looks mid-30s to me.

Huh, I always thought Alexis Bledel looked weirdly young. I figured that's why she was picked to play the scared-little-girl hooker.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 02:58 PM

Originally Posted by Chuckit

Huh, I always thought Alexis Bledel looked weirdly young. I figured that's why she was picked to play the scared-little-girl hooker.

Absolutely. She's baby-faced. Though they certainly add to it with how they style her hair and such.

besson3c · Jul 30, 2007, 03:11 PM

MacNN bullies getting to you? This looks like a job for SARCASM MAN!!

Duh duh dddunnhhhh!!

Wherever you feel like somebody is being sarcastic to you, mocking you, bullying you, or being condescending, Sarcasm Man will come to your rescue! Defender of the greater good, altruistic protector of all that is decent... It's a bird, it's a plane, it's.... Sarcasm Man!

besson3c · Jul 30, 2007, 03:13 PM

I think there is a forum bug. I calculated that that image is actually displayed at 93.74% of original size.

I think MacNN must be dying.

Doofy · Jul 30, 2007, 03:33 PM

Originally Posted by Chuckit

Huh, I always thought Alexis Bledel looked weirdly young.

Yes. That's why I didn't figure it was her. The sig looks mid-30s, Alexis doesn't. Hence Rena Sofer guess.

Doofy · Jul 30, 2007, 03:34 PM

And Bessie... ...you're still not funny.

besson3c · Jul 30, 2007, 03:49 PM

Originally Posted by Doofy

And Bessie... ...you're still not funny.

My name is besson3c, hippy.

sek929 · Jul 30, 2007, 04:08 PM

Originally Posted by Kevin

Doof would never say that to me. Cause Doof knows I am a pretty easy going guy. People tend to make up personalities for people they really don't know on IRC and then when they read said post of said person, they also give them a way they think they respond. Which from what I have seen in here, and not just with me, it usually off.

I assure you sek, nothing you've said in this thread, or any has gotten my panties in a wad.

I use starch when I wear panties.

Obviously I noticed it. That was what the passive/agressive comment was about.

See, more passive aggressivenessness.

And I've told the forum for years that if anyone posts in reply to a post of mine, or posts a post about me, that I will indeed feel obligated to respond. So if you do any above it's a pretty good indication I will respond. Why? Because I've been saying as much for years.

Oh and

Do you always have this much to say about nothing?

besson3c · Jul 30, 2007, 04:15 PM

Originally Posted by sek929

Do you always have this much to say about nothing?

These sorts of discussions are always so circular. Somebody like Kevin will accuse you of doing x, y, and z, and when you say something he calls you a hypocrite. In the meantime, he is doing the stuff he is scolding you for doing (sometimes in the very post in question).

The best way to avoid these sort of loops is to STFU and move on, but he insists on dragging things on and on and on and on and on...

Watch this, his response will be about how I'm wrong, a hypocrite, I should practice what I preach, I'm being passive aggressive, projecting, whatever other bullshit he is stuck on that day. I wish we could get through to him that most people don't care about who is "right" or "wrong" with these silly lines of conversations, but just want him to STFU and walk away from it.

I'd love to be ignored by him, but I've tried in vain. The latest chapter in this whole thing is him going on about MacNN bullies. He calls this easy going? I'd hate to see hard going.

Kevin · Jul 30, 2007, 04:27 PM

Originally Posted by Dakarʒ

That's what they said about ca$h calling Railroader Kilbey.

Ok you go ahead Dakar.

Originally Posted by besson3c

Dakar3: Is Kevin mocking you or being condescending? What a MacNN bully!

#1 no. #2 being a bully isn't just being condescending.

You can be the latter and not be a bully. Me and Doofy had a conversation about this on AIM about a 1/2 hour ago. And he pretty much agreed with my about my concept as to what a bully was.

Originally Posted by sek929

Do you always have this much to say about nothing?

Why is it when people have run out of valid attacks, they revert to OMG YOU POSTED LOTS OF WORDS!!1

Lighten up sek.

Originally Posted by besson3c

These sorts of discussions are always so circular.

That is the only part of your post you got right.

BTW besson when you reply with the same type of answers, you are going to know my responses. So when you "predict" what I am going to say, it's not that impressive since you basically say the same thing in each post. Then you blame me for doing the same thing.

There is where the circle comes in.

<--- still no panties in a knot.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 04:28 PM

Originally Posted by Kevin

Ok you go ahead Dakar.

Actually, you go ahead. If I've misinterpreted forum precedent, I'm sure they'll set me straight.

sek929 · Jul 30, 2007, 04:29 PM

Originally Posted by Dakarʒ

Now you people just aren't trying![/false exasperation]

Edit: I see it took Kevin nine lines to show how unwadded his panties are.

He didn't use a smiley with his sarcastic dig at me so he saw fit to write me a lovely novel.

Isn't that what he chastised you about for like 3 pages once?

analogika · Jul 30, 2007, 04:30 PM

Originally Posted by besson3c

but just want him to STFU and walk away from it.

I'd love to be ignored by him, but I've tried in vain. The latest chapter in this whole thing is him going on about MacNN bullies. He calls this easy going? I'd hate to see hard going.

Quit the ****ing whining. It's AT LEAST as annoying.

Kevin · Jul 30, 2007, 04:32 PM

Originally Posted by Dakarʒ

Actually, you go ahead. If I've misinterpreted forum precedent, I'm sure they'll set me straight.

Me go ahead? I wasn't the one "warning" people. You told me to "be warned"

So go ahead.

Originally Posted by sek929

He didn't use a smiley with his sarcastic dig at me so he saw fit to write me a lovely novel.

This not only doesn't make sense. But it has nothing to do with my thought processes.

And if I used sarcasm without being obvious, and you didn't catch it, then yes, it was my fault, and I fully apologize.

(BTW my dig with dakar about that wasn't so much him doing that, but him belittling others for not getting it when he admitted he was purposely being vague.)

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 04:33 PM

Originally Posted by sek929

He didn't use a smiley with his sarcastic dig at me so he saw fit to write me a lovely novel.

Isn't that what he chastised you about for like 3 pages once?

Honestly, I don't keep track of it. He probably has a laundry list of grievances with me, and many of them are couched in whatever adjectives and psychoanalyses he is enjoying at the time, so as to render the majority of them worthless.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 04:36 PM

Originally Posted by Kevin

Me go ahead? I wasn't the one "warning" people. You told me to "be warned"

So how the hell does "go ahead' make any sense as a response to that?

Go ahead and what?

Kevin · 04:51 PM

Originally Posted by Dakarʒ

Honestly, I don't keep track of it. He probably has a laundry list of grievances with me,

Even though I've only complained to you about one thing Dakar?
If ones rant is so just, they don't have to revert to exaggeration.

I only had one rant about you Dakar. Just one. And it was a valid one. And ever since I made that rant, you've been nothing but silly to me.

and many of them are couched in whatever adjectives and psychoanalyses he is enjoying at the time, so as to render the majority of them worthless.

No, I use words that fit the actions. If you do said actions a lot, your going to hear said words used to describe said actions a lot.

That's just common sense.

Originally Posted by Dakarʒ

So how the hell does "go ahead' make any sense as a response to that?

Well when you say "be warned" you are warning person ahead of time about a further action that will soon or has already taken place no?

My response was "go ahead" meaning go on with whatever it is I should "be warned" about.

The sad part about this all is. for the whiners that are complaining about me. You have an out. You have the ability to get me to stop responding to your posts. Yet you choose not to do it. Why? No clue. Well thats not true. I have an inkling.

KeriVit · Jul 30, 2007, 04:40 PM

Where's the NuNuNuNuNU guy?

He makes everybody happy.

ThinkInsane · Jul 30, 2007, 04:41 PM

Well now I'm the one warning people. You scamps better tread lightly, this thread is now on double secret probation.

Kevin · Jul 30, 2007, 04:42 PM

Fine with me.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 04:43 PM

Originally Posted by Kevin

Even though I've only complained to you about one thing Dakar?
If ones rant is so just, they don't have to revert to exaggeration.

I don't pay attention. I know you complain a lot. I don't keep track about what.

Originally Posted by Kevin

I only had one rant about you Dakar. Just one. And it was a valid one.

You think your argument is valid? What suprise! I'm glad you let me know.

Originally Posted by Kevin

No, I use words that fit the actions. If you do said actions a lot, your going to hear said words used to describe said actions a lot.

That's just common sense.

You're biased. You opinion is no more valid than mine. That's common sense.

Dakarʒ · Jul 30, 2007, 04:45 PM

Originally Posted by ThinkInsane

Well now I'm the one warning people. You scamps better tread lightly, this thread is now on double secret probation.

Yes, Dean Vernon.

Kevin · Jul 30, 2007, 04:45 PM

Originally Posted by Dakarʒ

I don... <snipped>

No

Ahehahhehehaheehae

Dakarʒ · 04:55 PM

Yes