|
|
New MB and MBP cases revealed (and Oct 14 speculation) (Page 3)
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogika
No, it's not, no matter how much your wishful thinking might try to will it that way.
Umm, I'm don't think that was very appropriate. How about we keep it factual?
The top logo is definitely blurred, but it would be quite a stretch to say it is a USB logo.
All I'm saying is these images don't prove FW will be dropped. And all this "FW is gone" drama is highly premature.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Umm, I'm don't think that was very appropriate. How about we keep it factual?
The top logo is definitely blurred, but it would be quite a stretch to say it is a USB logo.
Actually, keeping it factual is precisely what I'm trying to do. Apologies if the tone seemed slightly offensive - please don't take it personally. I'm just annoyed because I WISH it were true, but it's very obviously not, at least in that pic.
The two ports are the same size. And while you may believe that it doesn't look like a USB logo, it unfortunately does look like a blurred version of the other logo, and it unfortunately does NOT look like a blurred Firewire logo (since it appears to have a "stem" in the top middle, and the Firewire logo has a strong emphasis on the upper right arm of the "Y" shape - take a look at the faint, blurred logo in the MacBook Pro photo), and it is placed right next to a hole that is the exact same shape as the other hole that IS clearly labeled with a USB logo.
(
Last edited by analogika; Oct 12, 2008 at 12:04 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
I hope it's a SIM card slot, thereby implying that the new MBPs will have integrated 3G modems. I don't think so, but it would fit with the size.
Now *that* would ****ing rock.
In Germany, the iPhone comes with a second SIM at no extra charge, and that taps right into the data flatrate (wtf is AT&T's problem, anyway? - oh yeah, lack of infrastructure to handle the traffic...).
That would be a nice combination, and I really wouldn't care about tethering, then...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
It definitely looks like USB to me.
Closeup compared to white MacBook.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's definitely USB.
Unless there's another port in an unusual place like the back of the machine or something, this looks like the end for FireWire on the MacBook.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Does anyone have any idea of how the top and bottom cases attach? If they are no longer using screws and are moving completely over to a clip system (like the mac mini's) these things will be a nightmare to work on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Big Mac
Removing Firewire from a product line that previously had it like the MacBook is DUMB DUMB DUMB. For one, it completely screws everyone with digital camcorders. I think iMovie still is unable to use USB for camcorder input, but even if it were a lot of people would buy these machines and then wonder where the Firewire port went. Firewire is and well remain technically superior, and Apple now has the market share to continue pushing the standard. Please don't piss me off yet again, Apple.
Originally Posted by Eug
On many video cameras, the USB is strictly for stills not video. Oh and iMovie '08 is a steaming turd. I wonder what proportion of users use it over iMovie '06. I mean even Apple agrees '08 is a steaming turd, and offers '06 as a downloadable replacement for anyone who asks.
If they drop it (the shots are too blurry for me to pass judgement), I don't see it as being a big deal for the bulk of MacBook purchases.
The recent (last 2 years or so) crop of HD consumer camcorders have shifted toward HDD/flash storage with USB for faster-than-realtime importing and more widespread compatibility. Anyone with a legacy tape/Firewire consumer camcorder already has a machine with Firewire to use for importing footage.
With eSATA for mass storage and USB for everything else, why would consumers want to bother with Firewire? The pros will be shackled to it for years with their audio/video gear, but they're not buying many MacBooks and they're not going to leave the platform.
Originally Posted by analogika
As I've said before above, there are whole industries where Firewire is THE standard connector, and will be for some time.
These are core markets for Apple.
How many low-end laptops are these industries buying?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mduell
With eSATA for mass storage and USB for everything else, why would consumers want to bother with Firewire?
The problem being, of course, that the new MacBooks do not appear to have eSATA either, and there's no way to add it or FireWire due to the lack of an expansion slot.
The pros will be shackled to it for years with their audio/video gear, but they're not buying many MacBooks and they're not going to leave the platform.
How many low-end laptops are these industries buying?
I dunno - musicians in general are not the wealthiest bunch around, and MBPs are expensive. I could see Apple losing the audio market over this... surely one can manage to get a solution to work on Windows, where even a cheap $600 Dell laptop can be given FireWire capability via an ExpressCard. It's not like there isn't any software for pro audio on the dark side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mduell
If they drop it (the shots are too blurry for me to pass judgement), I don't see it as being a big deal for the bulk of MacBook purchases.
The recent (last 2 years or so) crop of HD consumer camcorders have shifted toward HDD/flash storage with USB for faster-than-realtime importing and more widespread compatibility. Anyone with a legacy tape/Firewire consumer camcorder already has a machine with Firewire to use for importing footage.
With eSATA for mass storage and USB for everything else, why would consumers want to bother with Firewire? The pros will be shackled to it for years with their audio/video gear, but they're not buying many MacBooks and they're not going to leave the platform.
How many low-end laptops are these industries buying?
I agree completely with what you're saying, and I don't think it will hurt APPLE'S bottom line much that we've lost the best compromise there's ever been between feature-packed workstation, portability, and price, but it still saddens, annoys, and angers me.
While a musician/engineer who's working on the Mac is unlikely to switch to Windows, I do know a number of musicians who've been planning to switch, and I know of a bunch where the MacBook feature set vs. price was the deciding factor in their decision to switch over the past two years.
Though I don't have absolute numbers of course, I do know that for all the travelling musicians I know, portability is an absolute priority.
They have their mainstay desktop workstations for heavy lifting, and need as lightweight and portable a machine that will still give them decent on-the-road options. A good friend's initial reaction: "I don't WANT to lug around a 15" 'book!"
FWIW, I had a customer in a few weeks ago who spent over €800 on getting his 12" PowerBook repaired.
From the looks of those cases, the 15" might be even thinner and slightly smaller than before; if it's lighter, as well, I won't be *too* pissed once it's time to buy (though the likely higher price will delay my purchase by a year or so)...
Edit:
In reconsideration:
If that topcase is in fact engineered from a single block, as the rumours make it sound, then that thing will be a lot more solid than the last-iteration MacBook Pros, as well - if they manage to make a 15" MBP that feels as solid and sturdy as the MacBook Air, then I'll probably happily buy one and lug it around with me. The biggest problem with my 15" PowerBook was that it seemed so fragile and big. (that's what she said)
(
Last edited by analogika; Oct 12, 2008 at 02:06 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
I haven't read the entire thread, and maybe this has been discussed, but:
1) if the mbp are going to mini dvi or whatever it's called. could that mean new displays are in the works to incorporate the new plug?
2) if not, then apple would be forcing users to get an adaptor in which case equals people might not want to buy a new laptop if they want an external monitor of any kind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
"However, it does confirm that both the mainstream and pro notebooks will share the same core platform and that the MacBook Air's design requires a different approach."
What does Appleinsider means with different approach? I was waiting 120 and 250 GByte HDs in the MacBook Air
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
it looks like two USB to me.
If accurate I guess of depends on weight, other features, and price. Cuz if it's just mainly the enclosure (and the loss of fw) I may end up just getting a refurb MacBook white. I prefer the white plastic over the current alu mbp anyway.
Only 2 more days until we know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
It looks like the new MB(P)s will not have Intel Cantiga chipsets at all. It appears they will come not only with dedicated NVIDIA GPUs, but also with an NVIDIA chipset. The MCP79 platform will offer the same 1066 MHz FSB, DDR3, and PCIe-2.0 support as Cantiga, but will integrate Cantiga's two bridge chips (Northbridge and Southbridge) into just one reducing chipset footprint. In addition the chipset will offer Hybrid SLI (allowing both integrated and dedicated graphics side by side with dynamic switching between the two depending on load/battery) and flash caching ("DriveCache").
MB will get MCP79MX with 9300M or 9400M
MBP will come with MCP79MX and 9600M
MBA could get low-power chipset MCP79U and retain integrated graphics
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles..._macbooks.html
I was really hoping for a 9650M. Maybe the high-end MBP will have that as an option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug
it looks like two USB to me.
If accurate I guess of depends on weight, other features, and price. Cuz if it's just mainly the enclosure (and the loss of fw) I may end up just getting a refurb MacBook white. I prefer the white plastic over the current alu mbp anyway.
Only 2 more days until we know.
Yes, if the pictures are legit, then we kiss bye-bye FW. My hope are that the pictures are not the real deal, since Apple Legal is nowhere to be seen.
By the way, can target disk mode work through USB?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Pierre B.
Yes, if the pictures are legit, then we kiss bye-bye FW. My hope are that the pictures are not the real deal, since Apple Legal is nowhere to be seen.
They have no clout in China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogika
They have no clout in China.
Ah, I see. So, these Chinese are a real trouble for Apple's secrecy. And probably this is the end of FW after all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Home in front of my computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by brassplayersrock²
I haven't read the entire thread, and maybe this has been discussed, but:
1) if the mbp are going to mini dvi or whatever it's called. could that mean new displays are in the works to incorporate the new plug?
2) if not, then apple would be forcing users to get an adaptor in which case equals people might not want to buy a new laptop if they want an external monitor of any kind.
Looks like it. I have a mini-DVI connector I use for my ACD, but my port looks bigger than the ones in the photos. Is there a smaller version now? Micro-DVI or something? Not like it's a big deal, they're $20.
Also, I agree they are both USB. Not FireWire.
Two more days. Let's hold off the bitching. When they come out, you may continue.
I just want to know the price of the 13". 13" is the sweet spot for me. 15" is too big and 17" is monstrous. 12" or lower would be too small for main use. I use only my MacBook. I don't have a second computer, all my working is on this one machine. And it's great. 13" is great. I love 13"... I just wish I had a slightly higher resolution. Maybe 1440x900 please?
I do wish for colors though. I'd be all over a MacBook with a nice sunny color like yellow, orange or red. The same shade as the iPod nano. But that's wishful thinking, right? I'm not holding my breath for colors sadly. Too much overhead and unsold colors for Apple to keep. But would be a nice surprise.
I wonder what the "One More Thing..." will be. I can't wait for Tuesday. I do miss the days when they did live webcasts though. Auto-reloading news pages aren't the same. Especially when the one you're reading dies or stops updating and you have to figure out who to go to next.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
The upper symbol is the FW logo. The lower is USB.
Too close to call. On the one hand, the logos do not look the same, and are close enough to each other that the lens distortion shouldn't be that significant. On the other hand, if I had to judge that second icon alone, I'd say it was USB - all recent Apple Firewire ports I can find have the corners covered by plastic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
Too close to call. On the one hand, the logos do not look the same, and are close enough to each other that the lens distortion shouldn't be that significant.
There's hefty jpg compression on there as well.
It's a USB logo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
Too close to call. On the one hand, the logos do not look the same, and are close enough to each other that the lens distortion shouldn't be that significant. On the other hand, if I had to judge that second icon alone, I'd say it was USB - all recent Apple Firewire ports I can find have the corners covered by plastic.
That was exactly what I was thinking. They're so close, why should only one show that much lens distortion.
But indeed, if you look closely you can see that the two ports are perfectly identical. On my MBP the FW port is at least 1-2 mm higher than the adjacent USB port and it is asymmetric - not just the plastic lining in the port, but the actual port has these cut off corners on the left side.
/——|
\____|
So from that I'm now leaning towards 2xUSB and no FW on the new MB. Two more days and we'll know for sure. But maybe one of these Chinese photographers will also find out how to use his camera properly before.
Oh well, I'm not too sad about FW (as I already mentioned in this thread). However no eSATA or EC/34 is a bummer.
So let me be the first to ask this naughty question: What did we sacrifice FW for on the MB? There's not a single new port. Is this just another "thinner is better" stunt on behalf of our favorite fruity company?
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
I'll just post these here for all to see. Source
On a totally *unrelated* note, they stole our stars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Oh well, I'm not too sad about FW (as I already mentioned in this thread). However no eSATA or EC/34 is a bummer.
Exactly. Removing FW is not the problem per se; leaving the MB with just USB ports without any other high speed connector replacing FW is a serious step BACK.
Originally Posted by Simon
So let me be the first to ask this naughty question: What did we sacrifice FW for on the MB? There's not a single new port. Is this just another "thinner is better" stunt on behalf of our favorite fruity company?
I am afraid you are spot on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by seanc
On a totally *unrelated* note, they stole our stars.
True, but their site still sucks.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Regarding this pic
Is anybody else here starting to think that might not be a taped off port at all, but just a piece of tape? The edges of the "port" aren't even parallel. Also, why would the area behind the port be darker? The background is light. OTOH why would there be tape there and what is the tape holding?
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Kids.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by brassplayersrock²
Well, this is just personal preference, but oriental girls never were my thing. No matter how nice they look. There is nothing racist in this, just instinctive reaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
It is USB (duh).
Could it be USB 3.0, or would this be too early?
As long as there is the card slot in the MBP, I can appreciate (in fact I prefer) there being no FW/fewer "holes" in the computer overall.
As far as no FW on the MB.. it think it is reasonable, especially since it cuts down on cost.
I *think* I also like the optical drive on the side better. It will remind me of my first "portable" computer: my IIc with the built-in 3.5" on the right-hand side!
|
10.7.1 on Mac Pro 8x2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Regarding this pic
Is anybody else here starting to think that might not be a taped off port at all, but just a piece of tape? The edges of the "port" aren't even parallel. Also, why would the area behind the port be darker? The background is light. OTOH why would there be tape there and what is the tape holding?
I dunno.
Look at this - the portion that's taped from the outside is at the bottom right:
And here, at the far end, left.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
Impulse Response
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
speculation: if they made a tv of sorts with a built in appletv that didn't need to be hooked up to your computer in anyway, would you buy it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Do the edges of the case look really sharp to anyone else (ala macbook air)? That thing is painful to type on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Home in front of my computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by brassplayersrock²
speculation: if they made a tv of sorts with a built in appletv that didn't need to be hooked up to your computer in anyway, would you buy it?
No, because that would be stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by brassplayersrock²
speculation: if they made a tv of sorts with a built in appletv that didn't need to be hooked up to your computer in anyway, would you buy it?
That depends on whether they'd make it DVB-T, DVB-C, DVB-S, or analog, and whether with a hardware or a software decoder, or, if they include ALL of those options so that people will actually be able to USE it in whatever country they might happen to live, and if they do so, how exactly they'd manage to eat the $150-250 (retail) that would cost additionally to the computer hardware, since they couldn't make the machine more expensive for including such frivolous bullshit.
In other words: Huh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
The interesting thing about that taped off "port" on the MBP is that the MB case seems to also have something at the exact same location.
There's nothing visible on the outside of the MB case, but on the inside you can clearly see something the size of a port with screw holes on each side.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Home in front of my computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Maybe it's something, maybe it isn't. We'll find out on Tuesday.
People on Macrumors think the mystery port might be mini-Displayport, though, and I think that might be the ticket, since it's convertible to dual-link DVI and HDMI as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Assuming the taped off "port" is actually a real port, what's with the location? It's right next to what appears to be the IR port, but why the huge gap between the EC/34 an the IR port?
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Looking at those pictures for the first time, I really hope the plastic-back mockups aren‘t real.
Unfortunately I believe they are plausible because Apple did the same thing with the iPhone -> iPhone 3G.
Still, I’ll forever love the timeless design of the original AlBook to todays MBP.
|
"The road to success is dotted with the most tempting parking spaces."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I hear something about FW over Ethernet using an adaptor. Is that possible?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anything's possible. Gigabit Ethernet is also faster than Firewire 800 (technically, at least - you can do 1 Gb full duplex, while FW 800 only has 800 Mb for the entire bus). Maybe that's the answer - a NAS unit for your external HD.
EDIT: Wait, I think I see what you mean: using Firewire over the RJ45 port commonly used by Ethernet? Yes, that is permitted according to the latest standard, but I'm not aware of a chip that implements that feature.
(
Last edited by P; Oct 13, 2008 at 05:51 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
So let me be the first to ask this naughty question: What did we sacrifice FW for on the MB? There's not a single new port. Is this just another "thinner is better" stunt on behalf of our favorite fruity company?
Cost. Firewire is not included in the Southbridge on either Intel or nVidia chipsets, so you need an extra chip and a more complicated motherboard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Assuming the taped off "port" is actually a real port, what's with the location? It's right next to what appears to be the IR port, but why the huge gap between the EC/34 an the IR port?
Some ExpressCards stick out quite a bit to fit a port or an antenna or similar. Apple may have taken that into account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
The interesting thing about that taped off "port" on the MBP is that the MB case seems to also have something at the exact same location.
There's nothing visible on the outside of the MB case, but on the inside you can clearly see something the size of a port with screw holes on each side.
Maybe the new manufacturing process that some sites have been talking about might offer a clue here.
Maybe all Macbooks will have their case tops starting life as a solid chunk (or brick) of metal forming the keyboard tray and laptop sidewalls, where the ports will go. From this, each Macbook will have the port apertures cut out according to the model. The base model will have USB only appertures cut, the highest model will have Firewire (and probably better that FW400) cut out.
Apple could still suse a single motherboard, and only connect the ports paid for by the model selected.
Also, I seriously tink there are a lot of potential switchers still out there that will be put off by the fact that the new $799/$899 laptop from Apple cannot connect their 18 month old camcorder, the replacement for which will make the macbook financially unviable. Having to pay upwards of $1500 just to have a DV/FW port would be a very bad move by apple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Another interesting thing about the new MB and MBP is that obvsiouly the AirPort card is now integrated into the display case rather than the base.
A recently leaked tech note contained this
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
EDIT: Wait, I think I see what you mean: using Firewire over the RJ45 port commonly used by Ethernet? Yes, that is permitted according to the latest standard, but I'm not aware of a chip that implements that feature.
Yes, that is what I mean. But it seems no one can tell if Apple is willing to implement it or not. Well, we will find out tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
So, modulo something unforeseen, we can bet that this is not going to happen. And that FW is definitely being phased out from the consumer machines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, I suppose we could be eternal optimists... Apple has a habit of implementing funky new features first.
Nah, very, very unlikely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Is anybody else here starting to think that might not be a taped off port at all, but just a piece of tape?
What about an SD/MMC Memory Slot? or a hole new port specially designed for SS Memory?
Wouldn't be that bad to have one, but with all the I/O interface diet all Apple products are in, it may be doubtful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|