|
|
Can we PLEASE stop putting apostrophes in plural nouns? (Page 3)
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
For all intensive purpoises your all wrong.
Yeah, well, what do intensive porpoises care about grammar anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
We only care that you abide by all the rules written on the ceiling of the Sixteen Chapel.
[EDIT: So long and thanks for all the fish.]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Classic thread in the making™
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
We only care that you abide by all the rules written on the ceiling of the Sixteen Chapel.
[EDIT: So long and thanks for all the fish.]
I stumbled upon that thread one day...words cannot describe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Any more predictions as to how many more intentionally misspellings and grammar mangling there will be in this thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hamburg
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
What if they are all unintenntional?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hamburg
Status:
Offline
|
|
Don`t you meen unintenntionallly?
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The New Posts Button
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
What if they are all unintenntional?
That would make us real loosers.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Im just going to stop using apostrophes in general. Theyre overrated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
A a friend of mine (a well-respected accountant) pronounces "supposedly" as "supposably".
Drives me up the wall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The deep backwoods of the PNW
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug
A a friend of mine (a well-respected accountant) pronounces "supposedly" as "supposably".
Drives me up the wall.
That one kills me.
I think we should throw diplomacy out and start openly correcting people. Otherwise, misspellings and incorrect pronunciations are going to get worse.
|
Sell or send me your vintage Mac things if you don't want them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
What about hyperbole?
Nothing wrong with a good hyperbowl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
...or a decent hyper-Bolly movie...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug
A a friend of mine (a well-respected accountant) pronounces "supposedly" as "supposably".
Wow, that's exspecially stupid.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
One should never stop striving for clarity of thought and precision of expression.
I would prefer my humanity sullied with the tarnish of science rather than the gloss of religion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by dcmacdaddy
What's so special about the Druggies ?
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by dcmacdaddy
“High fullutent”? How rude. I may be high, but I ain’t full of no tents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ok, what's right ?
Presidents Day ?
President's Day ?
Presidents' Day ?
Evidence seems to say all of the above. Why the heck is that ?
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The deep backwoods of the PNW
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apparently that guy is against...
Emos, loud-mouthed women and sports nuts. REPENT AND NEVAR WATCH THE SUPER BOWL AGAIN, SINNER!
WTF.
High fullutent is the best by far.
|
Sell or send me your vintage Mac things if you don't want them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: England
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CharlesS
It's singular if you're referring to the company as a whole - it's plural if you are referring to its members as a group.
Microsoft is a really huge tech company.
Microsoft are a bunch of soulless drones.
You get the idea.
It's still a pond difference.
I would say "Microsoft are a really huge tech company".
|
What the nerd community most often fail to realize is that all features aren't equal. A well implemented and well integrated feature in a convenient interface is worth way more than the same feature implemented crappy, or accessed through a annoying interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
And you'd be wrong, because Microsoft is one company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The deep backwoods of the PNW
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by wataru
And you'd be wrong, because Microsoft is one company.
Indeed. You could say "the employees of Microsoft make for one huge company", but when you're referring to the company as a whole, the singular verb form is correct.
|
Sell or send me your vintage Mac things if you don't want them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by wataru
And you'd be wrong, because Microsoft is one company.
No, you’re still wrong.
It is NOT incorrect to use the plural form when referring to a company. It doesn’t matter how many times you say it is. It might not be the natural way for you, or for people from your part of the world, to say it, but in International English, it’s a completely accepted construction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Milwaukee
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
It is NOT incorrect to use the plural form when referring to a company. It doesn’t matter how many times you say it is. It might not be the natural way for you, or for people from your part of the world, to say it, but in International English, it’s a completely accepted construction.
Those who have commented about never having heard/seen this usage simply haven't communicated with British subjects. In fact, even in Canada, this is the accepted form. I'm not sure about "down under" however. I've worked with people from England, and they always use the plural to refer to a group or company, whether writing or speaking.
|
Ya gotta applaud those bunnies for sacrificing their hearing just so some guy in Yonkers can have better TV reception.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Ok, what's right ?
Presidents Day ?
President's Day ?
Presidents' Day ?
Presidents' Day. It's very simple. Apostrophe goes at the end because its possessive and the plural of president ends with an S.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by olePigeon
Presidents' Day. It's very simple. Apostrophe goes at the end because its possessive and the plural of president ends with an S.
Logically speaking, since it’s a holiday to honour the birthday of a specific president, Washington, it should be President’s Day.
Moreover, many names of institutions, holidays, concepts, etc., that use a plural noun as their first constituent are made in a way where the plural noun acts more like an adjective than a possessive. Institutions like the United States Senate, to take a random example, are of this type. Presidents Day, if you prefer to spell it like that, is another of the same type.
Presidents’ Day is actually the name that makes the least sense, since there’s no logical plural to refer to; it’s mostly used by people who don’t know what they’re actually celebrating.
Snopes has a good article on this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
Logically speaking, since it’s a holiday to honour the birthday of a specific president, Washington, it should be President’s Day.
Moreover, many names of institutions, holidays, concepts, etc., that use a plural noun as their first constituent are made in a way where the plural noun acts more like an adjective than a possessive. Institutions like the United States Senate, to take a random example, are of this type. Presidents Day, if you prefer to spell it like that, is another of the same type.
Presidents’ Day is actually the name that makes the least sense, since there’s no logical plural to refer to; it’s mostly used by people who don’t know what they’re actually celebrating.
Snopes has a good article on this.
Good article.
I guess the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has it wrong then.
They have it as "Presidents' Day"
That's how they say you need to spell it in their Writing Test.
Redesigned (New) Naturalization Test: Vocabulary List for the English Writing Test
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status:
Offline
|
|
That convention also holds for Veterans Day, where no apostrophe is considered attributive, at least in the US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
It is NOT incorrect to use the plural form when referring to a company.
Yes it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by wataru
Yes it is.
No, it isn't. Some things are just done differently in different places.
For me, the Americanism of leaving out prepositions is abhorrent. Educated Americans probably agree with me, but it seems to be accepted by the unwashed masses of the USA.
"I'll write you Tuesday."
WTF?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
Logically speaking, since it’s a holiday to honour the birthday of a specific president, Washington, it should be President’s Day.
That would be true before 1968. Lincoln's Birthday is now also celebrated on Presidents' Day.
Originally Posted by Oisín
Moreover, many names of institutions, holidays, concepts, etc., that use a plural noun as their first constituent are made in a way where the plural noun acts more like an adjective than a possessive. Institutions like the United States Senate, to take a random example, are of this type. Presidents Day, if you prefer to spell it like that, is another of the same type.
Yes, technically Presidents Day is also acceptable. Assuming it wasn't a proper noun and they were talking about a day in general for presidents, the apostrophe would be at the end. I'm an amateur grammar nazi.
Originally Posted by Oisín
Presidents’ Day is actually the name that makes the least sense, since there’s no logical plural to refer to; it’s mostly used by people who don’t know what they’re actually celebrating.
Originally it was to celebrate Washington, but then it was made into a floating holiday and stuck on a Monday for business purposes. When that happened, it became a dual holiday for both Washington and Lincoln. There was even a proposal to include Martin Luther King and change the name of the holiday, but it was struck down.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The deep backwoods of the PNW
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by PER3
No, it isn't. Some things are just done differently in different places.
The problem is that there are definitely different grammatical, spelling, and vocabulary rules for the different evolved "dialects" of English. In the UK (and elsewhere), gasoline is referred to as petrol...but we'd never use that term here in the US.
I think it's more accurate within the confines of US English to refer to companies with singular nouns rather than plural. Seeing as it's not grammatically incorrect and it's the more commonly used syntax, I'd say it's the preferred syntax as well.
<edit>
The Economist apparently recommends using singular verbs when referring to companies as a whole:
http://www.economist.com/research/st...fm?page=805687
There's not really a hard and fast rule for it; I think it just depends on where you are.
</edit>
|
Sell or send me your vintage Mac things if you don't want them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by olePigeon
That would be true before 1968. Lincoln's Birthday is now also celebrated on Presidents' Day.
See the Snopes article:
Originally Posted by snopes
some states still observe Lincoln's and Washington's birthdays as separate holidays, some states observe only Washington's Birthday, some states commemorate both with a single Presidents' Day (or Lincoln-Washington Day), and some states celebrate neither.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oh. My. God. You all are still arguing about whether organizations are treated as singular or plural?!?
It's so simple: in the U.S., they are treated as singular. Elsewhere, as plural. That's it. Neither method is categorically right or wrong. One way is right in one place and vice versa. That's it. Capisci?
US: Microsoft makes lousy operating systems.
UK: Microsoft make lousy operating systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
See the Snopes article:
States don't govern citizenship. Presidents' Day (plural) is how the Federal Government recognizes it, so that's how it's spelled for people who want to become citizens.
After they're citizens, they can spell it however the State they reside in wants to spell it.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
This is why people hate the English language. Seriously.
—“How do I spell this word?”
—“That depends. Are you a citizen yet? See, if you’re not a citizen, it’s like this. If you are a citizen, it’s either like this or like this or like this, depending on which state you currently live in. Simple, innit?”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I believe it is one of the immigration litmus tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|