 |
 |
I Allowed A Guy To Give Me "Favors." (Page 8)
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by auto_immune 
Correct - he would be bisexual.
(aka aberdeenwriter)
I think you are just hoping I will let you give me favors.
Sorry, auto, I'm straight.
|
|
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.
Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Has anybody mentioned yet that this thread sucks ? Literally.
-t
We could talk about blueberries, mebbe. 
|
|
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.
Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by aberdeenwriter
I think you are just hoping I will let you give me favors.
Ha! - wishful thinking there, fella!
Originally Posted by aberdeenwriter
Sorry, auto, I'm straight.
Bisexual AND in denial? Its nothing to be ashamed of, Abe - time to face reality! 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
So as soon as a guy ever does anything with a girl, he can never be classified as "gay," no matter his desires or attractions? Example - guy gets a blowjob at the age of 14, but after that never touches a girl but does guys all of the time for the next 60 years. He's a bisexual?
The guy in your example would be considered a heterosexual who became bisexual and then became gay.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by auto_immune
Ha! - wishful thinking there, fella!
Bisexual AND in denial? Its nothing to be ashamed of, Abe - time to face reality!
|
|
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.
Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by auto_immune
The guy in your example would be considered a heterosexual who became bisexual and then became gay.
So why can't abe be a hetero who became bi then went back to being hetero? Why is he forever stuck at bi?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by auto_immune
The guy in your example would be considered a heterosexual who became bisexual and then became gay.
Except, by your logic, if he already considered himself gay before the blowjob at age 14. In that case, he’d apparently be stuck at bi for all eternity, rather than moving back to being gay?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
Except, by your logic, if he already considered himself gay before the blowjob at age 14. In that case, he’d apparently be stuck at bi for all eternity, rather than moving back to being gay?
It was generous of you to call it "logic."
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
It was generous of you to call it "logic."
Not really—I started out with ‘reasoning’.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
"Twisted confounding" is probably more accurate.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sexual politics is never fun to discuss with people who aren't smart.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
"Sexual politics"?!?! Seriously?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
"Sexual politics"?!?! Seriously?
Yeah, you know … Bill Clinton et al.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am just wondering when sexual politics are fun to discuss.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
When all participants agree on how to make fun of them, obviously.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
You must be smart. This is kind of fun.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
The term sexual politics refers to those things involving sexuality or in some cases gender identity that ideally will be approached with tact and diplomacy. Typically with the hope of not displaying exceptional insensitivity to the member of the minority you're dealing with.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top