Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Mac News > Supreme Court refuses to hear Apple e-book appeal, Apple owes $450M

Supreme Court refuses to hear Apple e-book appeal, Apple owes $450M
Thread Tools
NewsPoster
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2016, 10:58 AM
 
The US Supreme Court has today declared that it will not hear Apple's appeal of the contentious e-book case that started in 2013. As a result, Apple is on the hook for the full amount of the 2014 settlement: $400 million to e-book consumers, $20 million to the assortment of states who filed a lawsuit on the matter on behalf of consumers, and $30 million in legal fees.

The company was found by the judge in a bench trial to have colluded with Hachette, Macmillan, HarperCollins, Penguin, and Simon & Schuster in order to undermine Amazon, which until the launch of Apple's iBookstore was able to sell e-books for a money-losing standard of $10, which many critics at the time noted was intended to make it impossible for smaller competitors to enter the market, and which publishers objected to.

"The plaintiffs have shown that the publisher defendants conspired with each other to eliminate retail price competition in order to raise e-book prices, and that Apple played a central role in facilitating and executing that conspiracy," Judge Denise Cote wrote in her controversial ruling, finding Apple guilty of the price fixing. The verdict has been decried by legal analysts, antitrust experts, and the press. "Without Apple's orchestration of this conspiracy, it would not have succeeded as it did in the spring of 2010," Cote claimed.

Cote noted that the publishers' switch to an agency model, discussed by the publishers amongst themselves long before the iBookstore concept, forced a number of best-selling e-books to climb in price to $13 or $15. The finding was despite contradictory testimony from Google, Barnes & Noble, and even some Amazon executives that Apple had not introduced, facilitated or required that pricing structure.

A decision by the Federal appeals court in February upheld Judge Denise Cote's ruling to approve the settlement, reports Reuters, with the court believing Cote didn't abuse her powers nor approved the settlement too early in proceedings. In the Second Circuit ruling, the court highlighted testimony from an expert that consumers could end up with a greater award from the settlement than they claimed to lose in the first place, even when taking into account $166 million in settlements with publishers.
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Mar 16, 2016 at 05:41 AM. )
     
prl99
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: pacific northwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2016, 11:34 AM
 
Time to investigate the entire judicial system for corruption. I can't believe the Supreme Court refused to hear this case, especially with the current FBI situation. Of course, this can also mean the entire judicial and federal establishment is against Apple and is out to shut them down whenever possible. I've always known the east coast is against the west/left coast so this doesn't really surprise me.
     
   
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,