Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Consumer Hardware & Components > refurbished 23" Apple Cinema Display or new 24" LED-backlit CD?

refurbished 23" Apple Cinema Display or new 24" LED-backlit CD?
Thread Tools
Le Flaneur
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Austin, TX 78751
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2009, 10:41 PM
 
The price difference is minimal: the refurbished display is $750 (shame on Apple for not reducing the price more!), and the new 24" LED-backlit Cinema Display is $800 with the edu discount. The 24" has some great advantages: LED backlighting (no dimming over time!), speakers, power for a MacBook Pro, a built-in iSight camera. The big advantage of the 23" display: the matte display (and two 400 mb/s FireWire ports).

I'm not a graphics professional, but I find the reflections annoying on the 24" (I frequently use my new MBP with a 20" Cinema Display).

So is there a consensus about which is better?
( Last edited by Le Flaneur; Jan 18, 2009 at 11:18 AM. )
     
msuper69
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Columbus, OH
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2009, 10:46 PM
 
I bought the 24" LED for use with my MBA. It's a nice setup. I personally like the glossy display. I'd go with the latest technology given a choice. The price differential is minimal imo.

Just be aware that the 24" LED only works with the latest unibody MBA, MB and MBP.
     
Le Flaneur  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Austin, TX 78751
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2009, 01:53 AM
 
Originally Posted by msuper69 View Post
I bought the 24" LED for use with my MBA. It's a nice setup. I personally like the glossy display. I'd go with the latest technology given a choice. The price differential is minimal imo.

Just be aware that the 24" LED only works with the latest unibody MBA, MB and MBP.
I checked the specs, and the older display is actually brighter!
     
msuper69
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Columbus, OH
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2009, 01:56 AM
 
Originally Posted by Le Flaneur View Post
I checked the specs, and the older display is actually brighter!
Perhaps, but the new display is bright enough. I don't see a problem.
     
Koralatov
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aberdeen, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2009, 06:45 AM
 
Originally Posted by msuper69 View Post
Perhaps, but the new display is bright enough. I don't see a problem.
Me neither. Also, be aware that the old display has a CCFL backlight, and the new one uses LED. As a result, the old one might start out brighter, but will dim with age; the new one won’t suffer from that.

That said, I do still hanker after one of the 23″ displays, as it matches my MBP better. A stupid reason, I know.
     
Spheric Harlot
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2009, 10:12 AM
 
Originally Posted by Le Flaneur View Post
The 24" has some great advantages: LED backlighting (no dimming over time!), speakers, power for a MacBook Pro, a built-in iSight camera (and two 400 mb/s FireWire ports).
There are NO Firewire ports on the 24" LED display, only USB!

The old 23" model DOES have Firewire ports.
     
Le Flaneur  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Austin, TX 78751
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2009, 11:16 AM
 
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot View Post
There are NO Firewire ports on the 24" LED display, only USB!

The old 23" model DOES have Firewire ports.
Right. I mixed things up. I have corrected my original post.
     
Le Flaneur  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Austin, TX 78751
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2009, 11:17 AM
 
Originally Posted by msuper69 View Post
I personally like the glossy display.
So you're not bothered by the reflections (which appear in all but the most perfect lighting situations) or perhaps you don't notice them?

I guess the workaround is to apply an anti-glare film. Has anyone tried that?
     
Le Flaneur  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Austin, TX 78751
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2009, 11:20 AM
 
Originally Posted by Koralatov View Post
That said, I do still hanker after one of the 23″ displays, as it matches my MBP better.
How about the greatly-reduced reflections?
     
Veltliner
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2009, 04:33 PM
 
Originally Posted by Le Flaneur View Post
I checked the specs, and the older display is actually brighter!
brighter is not necessarily better. For serious editing you actually have to tone down brightness to about 120 cd/2.

But I like the old cinema displays for their image quality. I was not impressed by the new 24"LED.
     
Le Flaneur  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Austin, TX 78751
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2009, 04:36 PM
 
Originally Posted by Veltliner View Post
I was not impressed by the new 24"LED.
Can you be more specific?
     
Veltliner
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2009, 04:48 PM
 
Originally Posted by Le Flaneur View Post
Can you be more specific?
It's my personal preference.

I don't like that glass between me and the image (it's a bit like paintings behind glass, and paintings just in a frame).

That glass, and its reflections, gives me the impression of diluted colors. It puts something in between me and the image.
     
Le Flaneur  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Austin, TX 78751
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 25, 2009, 08:48 AM
 
Follow-up. I bought the 23" Cinema Display from someone on Craig's List. It's OK, but it has two annoyances: first of all, in an Austin, Texas summer, I find that it's a perceptible source of heat. The second annoyance is superficial: the display is thicker (or deeper) than I would like (thicker than the 20" CD.

But I have a window directly behind me and my office isn't really reconfigurable.

Am I really better off with the 23" CD?
     
Spheric Harlot
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 25, 2009, 09:08 AM
 
Originally Posted by Veltliner View Post
That glass, and its reflections, gives me the impression of diluted colors. It puts something in between me and the image.
That's in fact what the matte coating does.

Perception is odd, isn't it?
     
Simon
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 25, 2009, 01:05 PM
 
Perception is all that matters. If he doesn't like glossy, he should buy a matte display. End of story.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,