|
|
PB12" revB vs PB12" revC
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Im comparing both because Im getting an offer for 12" RevB SuperDrive at US$100+ less then 12" RevC Combo dirve version.
I would like to know did the RevC higher processing rate (+ .33Mhz...) improve its performance (a lot?) compare to the RevB? Im a graphic designer, will use this PB for some graphic works when im away from the office.
otherwise I'm fine with the RevB 40gigs HDD, and just spend the $ i save to add more RAM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
I used the RevB for about a 8 months and now have had the RevC for about 3 weeks. I would have to say that the performance is comparable but the RevC is faster - at program launch times and other functions. My reason for going to the RevC was not just that, but for the screen. The screen is much brighter and the white is cleaner. Not that the RevB was unusable, but I had the opportunity and I took it. It also runs �a bit� cooler.
|
MacBook Pro 15’er - 120 HD, 2gig Ram
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by sbdaigo:
I used the RevB for about a 8 months and now have had the RevC for about 3 weeks. I would have to say that the performance is comparable but the RevC is faster - at program launch times and other functions. My reason for going to the RevC was not just that, but for the screen. The screen is much brighter and the white is cleaner. Not that the RevB was unusable, but I had the opportunity and I took it. It also runs �a bit� cooler.
great, finally someone share some experience. i forget one important thing, the graphic card... RevB 32MB put me off.... guess i have to live with RevC
BTW, is there an option to choose a 128MB graphic card when pruchase?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
i would also have to say that rev c runs a lot cooler. i have a 1 ghz and i am happy with it, however for a graphic designer, you might find that the display might be a bit too small, you might end up spending alot of time shifting the image left and right to get the big picture. just my two cent.
|
PB12" G4 1ghz, 768mb Ram, 80gig HD, Superdrive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago,IL
Status:
Offline
|
|
I dont think the Rev B runs that hot at all,I use mine for graphic design and the screen size isnt a problem.
|
::12" PowerBook G4 | 1.33GHz | 1.25GB | 60GB | APX | OS X 10.4.1::
::30GB iPod Photo::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
ofcourse i know that the 15" / 17" screen is wayyyyy cooler then the 12". but when it come to the price tag and mobility (well i carry lots of stuff with me so cant bare too much of weight, lighter = better) 12" is still my 1st choice. We have to compromise sometime, cant hope to get everything perfect, atlease it work fine, I'm happy.
I can always use an external monitor with external keyboard and forget about the 12" screen when im back in office...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
The biggest difference between Rev B and Rev C (12") is the speed of RAM.
Rev C now uses the same (faster) speed RAM (DDR333) as the 15" and 17" models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by sillydog701:
The biggest difference between Rev B and Rev C (12") is the speed of RAM.
Rev C now uses the same (faster) speed RAM (DDR333) as the 15" and 17" models.
Certainly true, but I think the point of this thread is to find out if we can actually 'feel' this difference in everyday life. Is it a big difference?
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Simon:
Certainly true, but I think the point of this thread is to find out if we can actually 'feel' this difference in everyday life. Is it a big difference?
It is, for me.
For people like me, running huge applications uses lots of system resources (Virtual PC). the two main factors are speed of RAM and speed of HDD. (Of course I upgraded the HDD to faster one.)
The speed of RAM and HDD are the two main factors why the same speed of CPU appears a lot faster in desktop than laptop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Simon:
Certainly true, but I think the point of this thread is to find out if we can actually 'feel' this difference in everyday life. Is it a big difference?
you got my point here!
I quess i need to upgrade 2 stuff when i do my purchase huh?
1) RAM
2) HDD 4200 rpm > 7200 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles of the East
Status:
Offline
|
|
5400 if your planning to get it from Apple as BTO, 7200HD through an Apple tech or if your brave can do it yourself and void your warranty. I've used both and I have to agree with tekno_geek, I use my Rev B 12" for graphic design and it glides through all my jobs like a hot knife through butter, mmmmmmmmmm...............butter.
|
NOW YOU SEE ME! 2.4 MBP and 2.0 MBP (running ubuntu)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
ahh... Im not sure my local techs willing to install 7200rpm drive for me, quess i will get an external FW400 7200rpm drive & internal 5400rpm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|