|
|
Fall 2001, Am I reading this right?!
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Orange County, Ca
Status:
Offline
|
|
MS' MBU demoed Office 2001 for OS X this week. There was an article on Yahoo, http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/2001...pple_dc_2.html That says MS will release Office 2001 for OS X in Fall of 2001?! Am I reading this right?!
If I was right MS said at first that it was supposed to come out in fall of 2000. Fall of 2001?! I have to continue to classic for that long... Why call if Office 2001 then, it should be Office 2002. (If it is taking this long it better be cocoaized!!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ekoelbel
|
|
yup, they said fall of 2001. at least 6 months of classic.....
oh well, hope classic in the final release improves a lot from the beta classic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New Yawk
Status:
Offline
|
|
Frankly Classic is pretty fast for me, so as long as I can print...
...but it better damn well print
------------------
it's only after you lose everything that you're free to do anything
|
"Do not be too positive about things. You may be in error." (C. F. Lawlor, The Mixicologist)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nah. Office:mac 2001 was always supposed to have come out in the Fall of 2000. And it did in October.
Originally posted by bleen:
If I was right MS said at first that it was supposed to come out in fall of 2000. Fall of 2001?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New Yawk
Status:
Offline
|
|
No. Office:mac 2001 came out in Fall 2000, but Office:mac for Mac OS X will be released in Fall 2001.
their naming schemes make it all go nuts
------------------
it's only after you lose everything that you're free to do anything
|
"Do not be too positive about things. You may be in error." (C. F. Lawlor, The Mixicologist)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Orange County, Ca
Status:
Offline
|
|
MS said that Office:mac 2001 for OS X was supposed to come out in fall of 2000 back during steve's keynote in MWNY. Then they changed it to fall of 2001 in MWSF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Okanagan Falls
Status:
Offline
|
|
RELAX - I think any software company of size is going to have a hard time releasing a final version of OS X compatible software before OS X is even completed.
Let's hope they just include some new features like syncing with your TiBook as well as your Palm and shared calendars and contacts across a network
------------------
The Amazing Rando
|
The Amazing Rando
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: South River, NJ USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's times like this that I wish Carbon application creating was as quick and easy as it was billed to be.
|
Best Pickup line in the
world: exclaim , "Look a
bird", and when they
look up, take their
pants off. Oh yea, and
macs rule!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Did OS X come out yet? Moot point.
Originally posted by bleen:
MS said that Office:mac 2001 for OS X was supposed to come out in fall of 2000 back during steve's keynote in MWNY. Then they changed it to fall of 2001 in MWSF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Boston, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
OS X is slated to be released March 24 (next month). I cannot wait, but I do not forsee really using it until I can upgrade most of my core apps to run under OS X. It is going to be like running my Mac when I first unpackaged it and had no software (
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bay Area, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
<shrug> I see myself using Classic for quite a while. I'm wondering when Photoshop for OS X will come out frankly.
Originally posted by zoopsia215:
OS X is slated to be released March 24 (next month). I cannot wait, but I do not forsee really using it until I can upgrade most of my core apps to run under OS X. It is going to be like running my Mac when I first unpackaged it and had no software (
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Orange County, Ca
Status:
Offline
|
|
It looks like a lot of us will have the sluggish classic running for a while. Especially with MS being as Steve called it "Laggard" and releasing their software in the fall.
[This message has been edited by bleen (edited 03-05-2001).]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New Yawk
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Reverend Jim:
It's times like this that I wish Carbon application creating was as quick and easy as it was billed to be.
Um, it is as easy as it was billed to be. Microsoft's Office suite is a huge amount of code, and this revision is actually pretty quick. It's unlikely that they've been working on it for very long since CarbonLib has been a rapidly moving target (pretty much a new version each build). CarbonLib 1.2.5 only went GM a week ago.
Plus, this update is not just a port; they'll also be offering a lot more features, bug fixes, etc etc.
This will be an excellent update for MS Office, I predict, and blaming Carbon is really kind of silly. They're working on it.
If you're that uptight about Word docs, you can start using StarOffice this summer. And that's free.
------------------
the oddball newsletter
------------------
it's only after you lose everything that you're free to do anything
|
"Do not be too positive about things. You may be in error." (C. F. Lawlor, The Mixicologist)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Orange County, Ca
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by gorgonzola:
Plus, this update is not just a port; they'll also be offering a lot more features, bug fixes, etc etc.
The OS X Build will of course have tons of Bug fixes with the MBU Engineers going deep through all the Office Code, as for features the MBU hasn't said that there will be any yet.
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/product...e/osx_faqs.asp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|