[starman]

Too much talk!

[ghporter]

Originally Posted by brassplayersrock² 

god damn Glenn

There was a time when being a fan of Lucas' expansive works was looked down on...


Somehow, being nerdish in this way doesn't seem quite so bad a thing...

[driven]

Maybe we need a Princess Leia slave girl thread.

[ghporter]

Originally Posted by Powerbook 

You are kidding, From all the girls with fake-parts I have seen over the years I have been able to identify just about everything that has been done on them. Especially with U.S. women, since their e.g. breasts changes are even more adverse to nature than in other countries. Don't take my word for it, just ask a plastic surgeon. If you have a certain sense for "catalogue parts" you only need ten seconds. But maybe I have an unfair advantage here...

PB.

Maybe your "circle of friends" is very different from mine. But we've still been breeding for large breasts for a long time, and I can say for a certainty that of the 25 or so 22-30 year old women I have spent the last three years with, those with "disproportionately large" breasts for their body size have NOT had any "work" done. That's about 15 women out of that 25, by the way. Kinda makes it more difficult to concentrate on classwork, ya know?

And just to give an example, (and so nobody accuses me of not posting pictures enough here), here is Jolene Blalock.

[ASIMO]

Holy cowgirl. This thread is a living classic. I was barely 30 yrs old the start of this momentous occasion. What great start to a beautiful Sunday in San Diego. Cheers, all.

[driven]

She always made a much prettier vulcan than Mr. Spock or Tuvock.

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by ghporter 

And just to give an example, (and so nobody accuses me of not posting pictures enough here), here is Jolene Blalock.

I've no idea what this conversation is about, but Jolene's definitely had a boob job.

Sorry Glenn but I'm with Powerbook. I noticed a while back that there seems to be something in North American culture which somehow dulls your Lego detectors. I can spot 'em a mile off (with probably 95% accuracy).

[brassplayersrock²]

how can you tell Doofy?

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by brassplayersrock² 

how can you tell Doofy?

Experience and expertise.
They just don't sit right. Like they don't belong. Incorrectly perky, so to speak.

I'd post some examples but I can't think of any which are allowed in this family forum.

So here's a nice pic of Christy Turlington instead:

[Doofy]

[ghporter]

Originally Posted by Doofy 

I've no idea what this conversation is about, but Jolene's definitely had a boob job.

Sorry Glenn but I'm with Powerbook. I noticed a while back that there seems to be something in North American culture which somehow dulls your Lego detectors. I can spot 'em a mile off (with probably 95% accuracy).

I'll agree that a lot of "celeb" types have been enhanced. Apparently, Jolene had a job done in around '92, something I wasn't aware of. To me, she has very natural looking breasts, so I didn't even consider it. I know, for real, young women with small frames and large busts who are guaranteed natural, so Jolene's shape isn't "unnatural" at all.

It is easy to tell when extreme work has been done, and when the surgery wasn't done well, but I doubt that you're really 95% accurate. Of course that sounds like we both need to set up a real, scientific study to check this out. I think it'll take several hundred women, some natural, some otherwise, and of course they'll all have to be "substantial" so that the test would be valid... Sounds like fun, right?

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by ghporter 

I'll agree that a lot of "celeb" types have been enhanced. Apparently, Jolene had a job done in around '92, something I wasn't aware of. To me, she has very natural looking breasts, so I didn't even consider it. I know, for real, young women with small frames and large busts who are guaranteed natural, so Jolene's shape isn't "unnatural" at all.

Yep. I know girls who're really thin and have huge naturals. As an example we can all see, try "Rhian" at Page 3.
Jolene's sit a bit wrong. Not enough "meld" (ha!) into the torso. This is usually the give-away.

Originally Posted by ghporter 

It is easy to tell when extreme work has been done, and when the surgery wasn't done well, but I doubt that you're really 95% accurate.

Shannon Elizabeth in the original American Pie is pretty much the only boob job which has ever fooled me. That was before I saw her earlier work (such as Dish Dogs), obviously.

Originally Posted by ghporter 

Of course that sounds like we both need to set up a real, scientific study to check this out. I think it'll take several hundred women, some natural, some otherwise, and of course they'll all have to be "substantial" so that the test would be valid... Sounds like fun, right?

But yes, it does sound like we need a scientific experiment to sort it all out once and for all. Now, how do we go about applying for the grant?

More Christy T, because she's worth it:

[Doofy]

[ghporter]

Originally Posted by Doofy 

But yes, it does sound like we need a scientific experiment to sort it all out once and for all. Now, how do we go about applying for the grant?

I've been working on THAT problem for a long time, with a focus on another scientific puzzle: do the curtains match the carpet? Perhaps we can combine the two questions into a single, broad investigation...

More Christy:

[dudeness2]

princess leia slave girl pics are sexy

[rickey939]

[Mac User #001]

^ That girl has been in my dreams a lot Oh yeah

She's just so freaking hot!

[dudeness2]

blond girls in white are WOW

[osiris]

Originally Posted by Doofy 

Christy is one of the most beautiful women in the world imo.
I wouldn't be able to choose between her and Laetitia.

[mattyb]

I was channel jumping the other night and came across a programme on E! with the 50 sexiest people on the planet. There were some real losers but the models like Bundchen and Heidi Klum were IMHO the sexiest. AFAIK neither has had any implants.

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by mattyb 

I was channel jumping the other night and came across a programme on E! with the 50 sexiest people on the planet. There were some real losers but the models like Bundchen and Heidi Klum were IMHO the sexiest. AFAIK neither has had any implants.

Gisele has the Lego milkies.

[mattyb]

Originally Posted by Doofy 

Gisele has the Lego milkies.

Uh, what? Translation needed please.

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by mattyb 

Uh, what? Translation needed please.

Plastic tits, IIRC. Heard it on the grapevine and some early catwalk pics bear it out (and of course, now I need them I can't find 'em anywhere).

[Doofy]

Splendid.

[osiris]

A little camel action going on there.

[mattyb]

From some Leias Slave Outfit fansite

[brassplayersrock²]

^ sig. irony

[dudeness2]

Originally Posted by brassplayersrock² 

^ sig. irony

ahahha i was thinking same thing

[mattyb]

Well sorry for that last uninteresting piccie. Since there's a new 007 out :

[jokell82]

[OreoCookie]

Seeing the slave girl pics, maybe I should become more of a nerd

[Rumor]

Can't let this thread drop off the front page.

[Oisín]

Originally Posted by jokell82 

I can’t believe the first thing that crossed my mind at that picture was, “Hey, that’s Lindsay from Saved by the Bell”. I barely even remember watching that show!

[Chuckit]

Not just Saved by the Bell, but Saved by the Bell: The New Class.

[Oisín]

Originally Posted by Chuckit 

Not just Saved by the Bell, but Saved by the Bell: The New Class.

Even worse!

[Rumor]

[Chuckit]

Those blue squares are hot (linked).

[IceEnclosure]

mila kunis is hot as hell.

[ghporter]

Originally Posted by mattyb 

Uh, what? Translation needed please.

Originally Posted by Doofy 

Plastic tits,....

I'm stunned that you had to explain that one. I thought it was not only painfully clear, but quite clever.

As for "enhanced" or not, since I will never get within arms reach of any of these pictured ladies, I really don't care. As for "real" or not, well of course they're real, but perhaps not as nature intended. But then, nature didn't intend for any of us to shave/wax/pluck/etc., so I'm pretty much cool with that.

[mattyb]

Originally Posted by ghporter 

I thought it was not only painfully clear, but quite clever.

Clever eh? Probably why I needed a translation.

[Powerbook]

Originally Posted by ghporter 

Maybe your "circle of friends" is very different from mine. But we've still been breeding for large breasts for a long time, and I can say for a certainty that of the 25 or so 22-30 year old women I have spent the last three years with, those with "disproportionately large" breasts for their body size have NOT had any "work" done. That's about 15 women out of that 25, by the way. Kinda makes it more difficult to concentrate on classwork, ya know?

I know what you mean and I know in Germany we also have girls "with disproportionately large breasts". Still, other parts of the body then fit to these breasts. You will rarely see _totally_ slender girls with these breasts, and then the chance of artificial work is very high.

As for the spotting:
The E.U. beauty ideal with breasts is the form of a "water drop" in size B-C, which is rather like the natural breast.
The U.S. beauty ideal with breasts is an even half-spherical form, in size C-D.
Many surgeons also use the cheaper upper muscle implant routine, which - with large implants - really looks horrific imho.
Also if you see the person in question moving, this should really clear it up, a natural breast behaves totally different than dead material.

PB.

[Powerbook]

Originally Posted by Doofy 

Shannon Elizabeth in the original American Pie is pretty much the only boob job which has ever fooled me. That was before I saw her earlier work (such as Dish Dogs), obviously.

I spotted it, but I have to admit, it took a while and it would have been quite difficult on a picture, as it's well done with an under-muscle routine. In the movie however you see the breasts not moving, they are nearly cemented. Also you see the scars below the breasts (the most advanced solution there would have been to cut below the armpit and move the implant from there).

PB.

[ghporter]

Originally Posted by Powerbook 

I spotted it, but I have to admit, it took a while and it would have been quite difficult on a picture, as it's well done with an under-muscle routine. In the movie however you see the breasts not moving, they are nearly cemented. Also you see the scars below the breasts (the most advanced solution there would have been to cut below the armpit and move the implant from there).

PB.

The sub-pectoral implant is the stupidest thing in the world. What, these women aren't expected to use those muscles? That sort of implant causes discomfort with many activities, such as moving the upper arm across the chest, or "internal rotation" (this is where the humerus rotates so that if the arm were bent, the hand would move toward the body). Dumb idea, doctors. On the other hand, an axilary approach (through the armpit) is not uncommon...

[klb5090]

Lucy Pinder

[mattyb]

Thankyou klb5090, this thread was getting a bit too serious for a while there.

[klb5090]

Originally Posted by mattyb 

Thankyou klb5090, this thread was getting a bit too serious for a while there.

well its still serious....i just posted some serious hotties...

[dudeness2]

hotttttttt

[MallyMal]

Really like this pic.

[brassplayersrock²]

mmmmm.. cello p0rn

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by brassplayersrock² 

mmmmm.. cello p0rn

"Maryam D'abo", safe search off, second page.
One of my favourite pics.