|
|
Which State Should Be Nuked First
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Smallish town in Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
We all know that Bill Oreilly wouldn't mind if the terrorists nuked San Francisco and we also know that a great number of you defended his remarks, trying to justify them in some sick manner.
So I went on Google and search "nuke (state)" for each of the 50 states and this is what I got.
State - number of google hits - red or blue according to 2004 election.
California - 1840
Ohio - 1800
Washington (DC) 1420
Florida - 1410
Maine - 1350
New Jersey - 1290
New York - 797
Alabama - 483
Alaska - 423
Utah - 408
Kansas - 359
Oklahoma - 315
Texas - 295
Georgia - 243
Mississippi - 225
Kentucky - 173
Hawaii - 167
Michigan - 166
Virginia - 166
Idaho - 150
Iowa - 139
Nevada - 133
Illinois - 129
Vermont - 109
Minnesota - 104
Montana- 103
Arizona - 103
South Dakota - 102
Wisconsin - 82
Oregon - 81
South Carolina - 81
Nebraska - 79
Tennessee - 75
Colorado - 70
Maryland - 66
Massachusetts - 66
West Virginia - 60
New Mexico - 55
North Dakota - 48
Missouri - 44
Arkansas - 36
Wyoming - 30
New Hampshire - 26
Connecticut - 20
Pennsylvania - 19
Louisiana - 17
North Carolina - 16
Rhode Island - 13
Delaware - 11
Why is it that talk of nuking California and San Francisco is so much more prevalent among conservatives than talk of nuking Texas and the South is among liberals?
Awaiting an honest answer...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
You have to figure that pretty much everyone that wanted to nuke Ohio and Florida (vote fraud accusations) were liberal Democrats. Those states rank #2 & 4 respectively - with a combined total of *TWICE* that of California.
Looks like the lefties are the ones to point fingers at, contrary to what you stated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
As for wanting to nuke DC, people on both sides of the fence have their own reasons for wanting to do that. I'm surprised it didn't beat out California
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by macintologist
So I went on Google and search "nuke (state)" for each of the 50 states and this is what I got.
And I thought I had too much free time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Did anyone in this forum really try to justify O'Reilly's remarks supporting terrorist attacks on US cities? Wow.
Edit: I just searched for "nuke california" and mostly I got links about North Korea's current missile range. And a few jokes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pretentiously Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Millennium
As for wanting to nuke DC, people on both sides of the fence have their own reasons for wanting to do that. I'm surprised it didn't beat out California
The idiots! DC isn't a state!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Six feet under and diggin' it.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just give Florida to Cuba. No need to nuke it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why is Alaska so high on the list? I'm guessing lots of folks hate Ted Stevens?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Isn't it fun looking at statistically insignificant information trying to make reason out of it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by production_coordinator
Isn't it fun looking at statistically insignificant information trying to make reason out of it
That's exactly what I thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
California is a very strategic target for a number of reasons (all non political). If you want to do the most damage to the U.S., California is it.
* Every major climate is represented in this state, geologically the most diverse and useful for resources.
* "The Valley of the Heart's Delight," a name once dubbed for San Jose and the greater Bay Area. Some of the most fertile land in the world.
* 1/8 of the entire country's produce comes from California.
* 1/3 of the entire country's organic foods come from California.
* Almost 15% of the entire population lives in this state.
* Gross State Product is $1.5 trillion. More than any other state, and most countries.
Almost all of the above can be destroyed by a single, well placed nuke over Sacramento. Because of the parallel mountains, the fallout would be contained inside California, and possibly spread into Oregon and Washington. The north/south winds would carry the fallout throughout the states.
You have Stockton, Oakland, and San Francisco. 3 major ports, all within 100 miles of each other. Since all cargo can't be checked on large container ships, center containers can contain the parts for an extremely high yield nuclear weapon.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by macintologist
We all know that Bill Oreilly wouldn't mind if the terrorists nuked San Francisco and we also know that a great number of you defended his remarks, trying to justify them in some sick manner.
So I went on Google and search "nuke (state)" for each of the 50 states and this is what I got.
State - number of google hits - red or blue according to 2004 election.
California - 1840
Ohio - 1800
Washington (DC) 1420
Florida - 1410
Maine - 1350
New Jersey - 1290
New York - 797
Alabama - 483
Alaska - 423
Utah - 408
Kansas - 359
Oklahoma - 315
Texas - 295
Georgia - 243
Mississippi - 225
Kentucky - 173
Hawaii - 167
Michigan - 166
Virginia - 166
Idaho - 150
Iowa - 139
Nevada - 133
Illinois - 129
Vermont - 109
Minnesota - 104
Montana- 103
Arizona - 103
South Dakota - 102
Wisconsin - 82
Oregon - 81
South Carolina - 81
Nebraska - 79
Tennessee - 75
Colorado - 70
Maryland - 66
Massachusetts - 66
West Virginia - 60
New Mexico - 55
North Dakota - 48
Missouri - 44
Arkansas - 36
Wyoming - 30
New Hampshire - 26
Connecticut - 20
Pennsylvania - 19
Louisiana - 17
North Carolina - 16
Rhode Island - 13
Delaware - 11
the people in Indiana must be very relieved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by macintologist
We all know that Bill Oreilly wouldn't mind if the terrorists nuked San Francisco and we also know that a great number of you defended his remarks, trying to justify them in some sick manner.
Let me reiterate what O'Reilly has said many times on his show since all the over sensitive liberals started crying. It was SARCASM. Man some people get so bent out of shape. Sarcasm is all fine and good until it's an opportunity to try to make conservatives look like hell-spawn, then it's insensitive and morally objectionable and all that nonsense. For the love of...grab a tissue and grow some thicker skin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oh, and before I forget--if you happen to be one of the few people I have heard saying that the government is evil and the military are a bunch a barbarian killers who are wholly unecessary, then I think that your house should be considered a free fire zone for whoever wants to take it. You can defend it yourself...but then again that isn't going to happen since guns and violence are not needed because the world is all rainbows and butterflies and cute little kittens right?
If the shoe fits, wear it. If not be thankful you have people who stand in harm's way for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Mar 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
(
Last edited by porieux; Oct 2, 2006 at 07:13 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by porieux
If I ever meet this oreilly moron i will kick his ass.
I'm sure he's awfully worried too...
Do you even know who he is? Maybe you should at least take the time to listen to what he stands for before you make hollow (although entertaining) threats. As for this San Fran business, research the comment and context before you go taking anyone's word for it and decide for yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Looks like we have a case of post and run folks...
Nothing to see here...
Move along. /DRAGNET]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Unknown
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
If Heaven has a dress code, I'm walkin to Hell in my Tony Lamas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am surprised Alabama is not higher. I mean, do we REALLY need Alabama?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: LV-426
Status:
Offline
|
|
First we got the bomb and that was good,
'Cause we love peace and motherhood.
Then Russia got the bomb, but that's O.K.,
'Cause the balance of power's maintained that way!
Who's next?
France got the bomb, but don't you grieve,
'Cause they're on our side (I believe).
China got the bomb, but have no fears;
They can't wipe us out for at least five years!*
Who's next?
Then Indonesia claimed that they
Were gonna get one any day.
South Africa wants two, that's right:
One for the black and one for the white!**
Who's next?
Egypt's gonna get one, too,
Just to use on you know who.
So Israel's getting tense,
Wants one in self defense.
"The Lord's our shepherd," says the psalm,
But just in case, we better get a bomb!
Who's next?
Luxembourg is next to go
And, who knows, maybe Monaco.
We'll try to stay serene and calm
When Alabama gets the bomb!
Who's next, who's next, who's next?
Who's next?
cheers
W-Y
|
“Building Better Worlds”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status:
Offline
|
|
I guess I'm glad I'm in Delaware.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yoo hoo... Macintologist...
are you going to simply post and run in this extremely unscientific and purposeless thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Denville, NJ.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Whatever the polls say, can we all agree that Santa Monica needs to go? We don't need to take out the entire state of California, but the Beautiful People's Republic of Santa Monica needs about 20 Kilotons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
blabba5555555555555555555555555555555555555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by NYCFarmboy
the people in Indiana must be very relieved.
and WA
Hey. Did anyone try to replicate these results? I got 1.9 million hits for "nuke washington," and 389,000 for "nuke delaware." What gives?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by tie
Did anyone in this forum really try to justify O'Reilly's remarks supporting terrorist attacks on US cities? Wow.
No, And even O'Reilly said them in jest.
macintologist must have taken his tinfoil hat off.
(
Last edited by Kevin; Jan 3, 2006 at 08:17 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm disappointed Texas is only number 13. Of course, Texas can kick anyone's arse, so maybe the nuke droppers are a bit leery — or they just can't stand pinkos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nevada? Didn't we already do that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton
and WA
Hey. Did anyone try to replicate these results? I got 1.9 million hits for "nuke washington," and 389,000 for "nuke delaware." What gives?
Washington State and District of Columbia. They're probably combined when only searching for "washington."
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
Yoo hoo... Macintologist...
are you going to simply post and run in this extremely unscientific and purposeless thread?
ahem...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Smallish town in Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
ahem...
I have already made my point, which is that conservatives always talk about nuking liberals areas of the United States much more often than liberals talk about nuking conservatives area of the US.
Not post and run, just post and win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Matius
Oh, and before I forget--if you happen to be one of the few people I have heard saying that the government is evil and the military are a bunch a barbarian killers who are wholly unecessary, then I think that your house should be considered a free fire zone for whoever wants to take it. You can defend it yourself...but then again that isn't going to happen since guns and violence are not needed because the world is all rainbows and butterflies and cute little kittens right?
If the shoe fits, wear it. If not be thankful you have people who stand in harm's way for you.
You sir are a great American.... More people like you need to stand up against those that that use their freedoms.
And just like Bill O, that was sarcasm.
|
AXP
ΔΣΦ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by macintologist
I have already made my point, which is that conservatives always talk about nuking liberals areas of the United States much more often than liberals talk about nuking conservatives area of the US.
BWAHAHAHAH So you are saying the right has more sarcastic wit than the left? Cause you aren't being serious in saying that either side is being serious are you?
Not post and run, just post and win.
Yes you won something alright.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by macintologist
I have already made my point, which is that conservatives always talk about nuking liberals areas of the United States much more often than liberals talk about nuking conservatives area of the US.
Not post and run, just post and win.
So, you are finally admitting you are a liberal. Your claims of being "independent" have always seemed very contrived to me.
Your true colors are shown. I will refer to this thread whenever you claim to be an independent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
So, you are finally admitting you are a liberal. Your claims of being "independent" have always seemed very contrived to me.
Your true colors are shown. I will refer to this thread whenever you claim to be an independent.
how does that make him a liberal? Because he made a negative observation about republicans?
|
AXP
ΔΣΦ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'd much rather see Texas kicked out of the union than NUKED. All seriousness aside...
nuke(Texas);
post_count++;
Treehuggers don't care for violence as a means for problem solving. You guys crack me up, though.
|
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by TheMosco
how does that make him a liberal? Because he made a negative observation about republicans?
No, obviously because he called a negative observation about republicans a "win."
Also, can someone please explain why my google searches turned up so drastically different numbers than the ones in the OP?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by [APi]TheMan
Treehuggers don't care for violence as a means for problem solving. You guys crack me up, though.
Tell that to Green"peace", they're one of the best funded terrorist organizations in the world.
and then there's PETA...
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: On the dancefloor, doing the boogaloo…
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why can't the US just split up and become two seperate countries? I think it's about time.
|
If I change my way of living, and if I pave my streets with good times, will the mountain keep on giving…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MacNStein
Tell that to Green"peace", they're one of the best funded terrorist organizations in the world.
and then there's PETA...
I think PETA is another issue, but I'll speak to the Greenpeace bit... I guess they do get pretty radical sometimes. Ripping out entire fields of genetically altered crops in the UK is pretty "terrorous," and hanging in the rafters at a nuclear energy conference is also pretty abrasive.
We're talking about using a nuclear weapon on one of our own states; our own men, women, and children. The thought had never entered my head until this thread. Kicking a state out of the union, however, often does. Even in jest, conservatives are easily more violent than liberals. The stereotype is VERY real.
|
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kr0nos
Why can't the US just split up and become two seperate countries? I think it's about time.
Hah, Texas would gain majority in the new country and then bomb the other country and invade.
|
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by [APi]TheMan
Even in jest, conservatives are easily more violent than liberals. The stereotype is VERY real.
No, no they aren't. This is an issue regarding individuals, not political classes. See, I'll admit that both have the same propensity for violence, extremes on both sides are equally capable of terrible things and hateful attitudes. If you doubt me, take a long look at some of the liberals around here and see how vicious they get in a simple discussion (same with conservatives). It's all about how far someone will go to force their opinion, and that can get pretty bloody, regardless of which side of the political fence you're sitting. History shows an equal amount of violence on all sides.
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is it just me or is the list in the OP precisely evenly distributed between red and blue? In each of the top and bottom 10, there is exactly 5 of each color, for example, and the top half of the list has the same distribution of red and blue as the bottom half.
Was this thread a practical joke?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MacNStein
No, no they aren't. This is an issue regarding individuals, not political classes. See, I'll admit that both have the same propensity for violence, extremes on both sides are equally capable of terrible things and hateful attitudes. If you doubt me, take a long look at some of the liberals around here and see how vicious they get in a simple discussion (same with conservatives). It's all about how far someone will go to force their opinion, and that can get pretty bloody, regardless of which side of the political fence you're sitting. History shows an equal amount of violence on all sides.
Then we disagree, that's ok with me. I guess there's hope in the fact that there is a growing dislike of George W. Bush among people on both sides of the spectrum.
Originally Posted by Unkle Skeleton
Was this thread a practical joke?
Aren't all threads in the Lounge practical jokes?
|
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by TheMosco
how does that make him a liberal? Because he made a negative observation about republicans?
See below.
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton
No, obviously because he called a negative observation about republicans a "win."
Exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: On the dancefloor, doing the boogaloo…
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by [APi]TheMan
Hah, Texas would gain majority in the new country and then bomb the other country and invade.
Meh, it wouldn't take that many nukes (or even better nano weapons) to take out Texas.
Joking aside though, wouldn't it be far mor practical just to have one country with NY, Cali, Hawaii etc. and another one with Texas, Tennesee, Kentucky etc.? People could finally focus on real progress and not waste so much energy and resources on time consuming pettiness.
|
If I change my way of living, and if I pave my streets with good times, will the mountain keep on giving…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|