Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Minimum recommended computer for Longhorn... 4 to 6GHz ?!!

Minimum recommended computer for Longhorn... 4 to 6GHz ?!! (Page 2)
Thread Tools
olePigeon  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2004, 11:25 PM
 
Originally posted by Eug Wanker:
??? That doesn't make much sense. If they don't want to upgrade, they're not going to buy a new machine.
What about all those business with Software Assurance that have already paid for the Longhorn upgrade? Whoops, looks like new computer for the entire company.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Eug Wanker
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2004, 11:25 PM
 
Man, we don't even have X.4 yet and people are talking about the specific hardware requirements of X.6? As for me, I expect to get a G5 1.8 laptop with Radeon 9700 just to run X.4.
Originally posted by Kenneth:
My friend has a NEC notebook with WinME on it. WinME is a horrible OS ever, but she still sticks with WinME.
So, again, how does this help MS get end users to upgrade to Longhorn? It sounds like people will upgrade when they need new hardware. If that's Win XP SP2 on that hardware, then MS makes money. If that's Longhorn on that hardware, then MS makes money.
Originally posted by olePigeon:
What about all those business with Software Assurance that have already paid for the Longhorn upgrade? Whoops, looks like new computer for the entire company.
Even if that were true, that's irrelevant for MS, because already got the money for Longhorn. Anyways, Longhorn should run fine on any 3 GHz machine, even with crappy video. It's sort of like OS X. OS X runs just fine without a Radeon, but you don't get the benefit of Quartz Extreme.
     
itai195
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2004, 11:29 PM
 
Most businesses would upgrade their computers every 3 or 4 years anyway... And large ones purhcase their OS licenses separately.
     
Kenneth
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Bellevue, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2004, 11:34 PM
 
Originally posted by PowerMacMan:
One step at a time young one.

Apple will drop support for Macs without AGP slots first. More specifically, I expect Apple to make a Quartz Extreme video card a requirement. Meaning PowerBook G3s, first PowerBook G4 Tis, Rage 128 iBooks, and all of the G3 iMacs will lose support.

I don't expect Apple to start being discriminatory with the G4 Power Macs (Provided they have QE video) for many years to come.
I thought the TiBook/400 & 500 and all iBooks are AGP-based...
ATI RAGE 128 Mobility 2x AGP on them..

iMac G3 .. Rage 128 is AGP too.. at 2x
     
Lateralus
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2004, 11:38 PM
 
Yeah, they all have AGP but the stock video is not Quartz Extreme capable.
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
     
Eriamjh
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 7, 2004, 01:04 PM
 
What's really sad is that Macs may not even be at 4GHz by 2006.

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
     
GoGoReggieXPowars
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tronna
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 7, 2004, 01:11 PM
 
Aero, which is I guess equivalent to Quartz, needs:
a graphics adapter with full DirectX 9 support, 32MB of RAM, 32-bit color, and AGP 4x support.

http://arstechnica.com/news/posts/1083874709.html
     
Lateralus
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 7, 2004, 01:33 PM
 
Originally posted by Eriamjh:
What's really sad is that Macs may not even be at 4GHz by 2006.
...why is that?
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
     
soul searching
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Stuck in 19*53
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 7, 2004, 01:57 PM
 
Originally posted by PowerMacMan:
...why is that?
I'm being optimistic about it and think that we'll see such a beast from Apple in the summer or fall of �05. However, if the current problems IBM is facing continue throughout this year, it's not hard to believe that we will not see a 4GHz machine until 2006 (because we might not see a 3GHz machine until the end of this year or early �04).

"I think of lotteries as a tax on the mathematically challenged." -- Roger Jones
     
Eug Wanker
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 7, 2004, 01:58 PM
 
There might not be any 6 GHz PCs by 2006 either.

Intel is switching to lower-clocked dual-core designs instead.
     
 
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,