|
|
We don’t need any more Fart apps
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Land of the Easily Amused
Status:
Offline
|
|
Good.
It's about time there was even a bit more transparency about what is and isn't allowed in the store.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Congratulations subego, your thread made the MacNN front page!.
|
Slick shoes?! Are you crazy?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Status:
Online
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
"I know it when I see it." Excellent. Broad enough to cover every fart app ever conceived, specific enough for "we found it offensive and without redeeming qualities," and clear enough to remind submitters that Apple is in charge.
The most entertaining part is that they have specifically reminded submitters that "the more expensive your app, the more thoroughly we will review it." Also excellent. If you want to make a mint off of the platform, be prepared to defend it like a PhD dissertation.
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
These are definitely good first steps.
It still seems like there needs to be more communication with developers during the process. Though this will help, you really need some sort of "pre-authorization" for developers. Nothing binding, but something which will let you know if a specific feature is likely to be rejected.
Hell, you could even charge a couple hundred bucks for the service.
That probably won't happen, but it'd be nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|