|
|
The sudden influx of new members...
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
...in the Lounge is ruining MacNN. Where I come from, new members are timid and pay their dues before becoming all "confident" and "smart." What can be done about this problem?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: A crappy place in Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Interestingly enough, Jan. 2, 2009 seems to be a date many, if not all, of them have in common. Also looks like Cold Warrior is already on it.
|
"Why did this thread cross the line? Because its **** got stuck in a chicken." - Demonhood
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apart from spammers...
Perhaps the regulars aren't setting a good enough example?
If the noobies see that snotty posting or harassement are common here, they will not hesitate to post in that way themselves. If they see polite and respectful posts they will probably think twice about posting in another fashion.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The New Posts Button
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The deep backwoods of the PNW
Status:
Offline
|
|
Personally, I think we should implement similar rules to the Lounge that we have on the Marketplace.
This is primarily a Mac user forum. The Lounge (and, by extension, the PWL) exist for the whole community feeling of the forum. There's no good reason why brand new users should be posting in the Lounge - especially not the PWL.
So why not say that users need at least 100 posts before they can post in the Lounge and PWL? That way, people don't join solely to post inane comments in a Lounge thread (or two or five).
|
Sell or send me your vintage Mac things if you don't want them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dr. Wahnsinn
Interestingly enough, Jan. 2, 2009 seems to be a date many, if not all, of them have in common. Also looks like Cold Warrior is already on it.
They all have the Twilight thread in common, too.
I agree on the minimum posts before people are allowed Lounge access. But I think it should be lower, between 20-50. That should be enough to keep out the riff-raff.
|
All glory to the hypnotoad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jokell82
I agree on the minimum posts before people are allowed Lounge access. But I think it should be lower, between 20-50. That should be enough to keep out the riff-raff.
Hmm, perhaps a minimum and a maximum post level! Sort of like forced retirement...
|
"One ticket to Washington, please. I have a date with destiny."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jokell82
They all have the Twilight thread in common, too.
I agree on the minimum posts before people are allowed Lounge access. But I think it should be lower, between 20-50. That should be enough to keep out the riff-raff.
I agree.
Not many people would stick around for 100 posts without the Lounge. I think my first ten or so posts were probably in the technical forums, but since then, not so much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Apart from spammers...
Perhaps the regulars aren't setting a good enough example?
If the noobies see that snotty posting or harassement are common here, they will not hesitate to post in that way themselves. If they see polite and respectful posts they will probably think twice about posting in another fashion.
I couldn't agree more, some of you have been a bit aggresive, personally I wouldn't bitch around if people were just talking about a certain topic. But when all threads I see end up in personal criticism I see no respect going around.
You know what? I kind of love it here anyway, it's good that you stand up for something and at least this is one thread all of you agree upon
I'll go to your other forums and see what else is there, I've already seen a few and they seem pretty interesting...
Oh and please forget twilight, if you want to make every "fake noob" go away, stopping that thread would be a nice start
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by shifuimam
Personally, I think we should implement similar rules to the Lounge that we have on the Marketplace.
This is primarily a Mac user forum. The Lounge (and, by extension, the PWL) exist for the whole community feeling of the forum. There's no good reason why brand new users should be posting in the Lounge - especially not the PWL.
So why not say that users need at least 100 posts before they can post in the Lounge and PWL? That way, people don't join solely to post inane comments in a Lounge thread (or two or five).
this would kill this forum.
|
Bow chicka bow-wow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jokell82
They all have the Twilight thread in common, too.)
Yes, that darn honeypot needs to be eliminated ASAP.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Apart from spammers...
Perhaps the regulars aren't setting a good enough example?
If the noobies see that snotty posting or harassement are common here, they will not hesitate to post in that way themselves. If they see polite and respectful posts they will probably think twice about posting in another fashion.
The irony here is astounding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by thechidz
this would kill this forum.
False. But a bunch of annoying new people joining just to defend a lame teen drama and staying to push away all of the quality long-time members would kill this forum.
Originally Posted by Carla V.
I couldn't agree more, some of you have been a bit aggresive, personally I wouldn't bitch around if people were just talking about a certain topic. But when all threads I see end up in personal criticism I see no respect going around.
You know what? I kind of love it here anyway, it's good that you stand up for something and at least this is one thread all of you agree upon
I'll go to your other forums and see what else is there, I've already seen a few and they seem pretty interesting...
Oh and please forget twilight, if you want to make every "fake noob" go away, stopping that thread would be a nice start
The theory that someone posted a link of people here bashing Twilight on a Twilight fan-forum doesn't seem to far-fetched to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
The theory that someone posted a link of people here bashing Twilight on a Twilight fan-forum doesn't seem to far-fetched to me.
BINGO.
Finally a good explanation what's going on.
Even more a reason to sink that thread into oblivion.
For the first time ever, I'm actually FOR deleting the whole thread, not only closing it.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, please.. Could someone delete that thread? This is getting scaring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jokell82
They all have the Twilight thread in common, too.
I agree on the minimum posts before people are allowed Lounge access. But I think it should be lower, between 20-50. That should be enough to keep out the riff-raff.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_MJaFzycU0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by thechidz
this would kill this forum.
I read this every single time somebody suggests a change here.
I support the 100 posts idea.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The deep backwoods of the PNW
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Carla V.
I couldn't agree more, some of you have been a bit aggresive, personally I wouldn't bitch around if people were just talking about a certain topic. But when all threads I see end up in personal criticism I see no respect going around.
You know what? I kind of love it here anyway, it's good that you stand up for something and at least this is one thread all of you agree upon
I'll go to your other forums and see what else is there, I've already seen a few and they seem pretty interesting...
Oh and please forget twilight, if you want to make every "fake noob" go away, stopping that thread would be a nice start
Oh, come ON. You "love it here" after, what, 36 hours of membership? That's kind of a stretch, don't you think?
(
Last edited by shifuimam; Jan 9, 2009 at 12:01 PM.
)
|
Sell or send me your vintage Mac things if you don't want them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status:
Offline
|
|
Isn't generating new memberships the goal of MacNN? Who cares if a bunch of people sign up, are people afraid their comfy lounge forum will change?
I've never heard of twilight and to be honest, I didn't even look at that thread until this thread was created. I think its a bad idea to delete/lock an ongoing thread just because the people who are posting there are new members. Its heavy handed and flies in the face of what the lounge is supposed to be.
|
~Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: detroit,mi,usa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oh my god, you guys are actually serious. I thought this was a joke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Maflynn
I've never heard of twilight and to be honest, I didn't even look at that thread until this thread was created. I think its a bad idea to delete/lock an ongoing thread just because the people who are posting there are new members. Its heavy handed and flies in the face of what the lounge is supposed to be.
a) The thread starter requested it.
b) Those "new" members are recruited on a Twilight fansite to come here to "do something about those Twilight haters at 'NN".
c) Heavy handed ? Yes, and for once, I'm all FOR a deletion, although I'm normally against deleting anything.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
a) The thread starter requested it.
I missed that
b) Those "new" members are recruited on a Twilight fansite to come here to "do something about those Twilight haters at 'NN".
So what, the thread will go stale and people will stop posting to it
c) Heavy handed ? Yes, and for once, I'm all FOR a deletion, although I'm normally against deleting anything.
I'm not for it, and who cares if a bunch of pro-twilight fans come out of the wood work to support/refute the thread here. Just skip of the thread, in the lounge. I've largely ignored it and that's worked well.
|
~Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Arguments here and there and the thread is still there
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Maflynn
Just skip of the thread, in the lounge. I've largely ignored it and that's worked well.
Did you miss that they started infesting other threads ?
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Did you miss that they started infesting other threads ?
-t
Infesting is a very strong word. Some have actually made tech comments on the other forums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
I read this every single time somebody I suggests a change here.
That's better.
Originally Posted by Maflynn
Isn't generating new memberships the goal of MacNN? Who cares if a bunch of people sign up, are people afraid their comfy lounge forum will change?
I'd say generating ad revenue is the goal of MacNN. And a bunch of lame, temporary members driving away previously committed, long-term members is to the detriment of MacNN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Did you miss that they started infesting other threads ?
-t
Yup.
Yeah, I’d noticed a couple of new members here and there, but nothing much out of the ordinary, really. I’d just guessed they were probably new Mac users who’d gotten a MacBook for Christmas or something. Not having read the Twilight thread, I hadn’t noticed anyone ‘infesting’ anything.
I don’t think deleting the thread would be necessary, though a lock might be in order. Let’s not forget, this forum isn’t innocent of recruiting people off to some thread on some other forum to gang up on haters of something (before someone says it: no, I don’t have specific links. I can’t remember what these threads were about, but I’m fairly sure I remember it happening at least twice), so stones and glass houses and all that, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: petting the refrigerator.
Status:
Offline
|
|
This whole fiasco seems a bit xenophobic to me. I think we should grant a little more time to see if any of these newbs adjust. The way I see it, the ones who can be productive members will stick around, but the square pegs will likely fall off when their a.d.d. kicks it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Did you miss that they started infesting other threads ?
-t
omg, you mean to tell me they're actually posting here at MacNN? What is this world coming to. We should ban everyone and not allow any new posts.
Seriously do you know how bad that sounds, new members posting in other threads.
|
~Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status:
Offline
|
|
By the way, if they're hijacking threads, belittling other member's posts, making off color remarks and generally crapping on threads they'll fit right in with the rest of members here.
|
~Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think the issue is not that they're posting at all, it's the content of their posting and their attitudes. I think most everyone here would welcome new forum members, but it's pretty clear that these are Twilight fangirls that were directed here from another forum. I'd be shocked if even 1/4 of them owned a Mac.
|
All glory to the hypnotoad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status:
Offline
|
|
So this is where the party is?
The new members don't bother me, but I think there should be a post minimum of at least 100 before Lounge Access.
I think I had 1000 before I even stepped into it. And by it, I mean the Lounge.
Furthermore, I think hazing should be allowed. The internet makes this difficult, but I think that if we ask our newest members to partake in some dress-wearing endeavor we'll be forced into taking their word that they are in fact honoring our request. Or something.
How about cartoonish avatars for the noobz?
|
"Faster, faster! 'Till the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." - HST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, the vehemence being displayed here is getting kind of weird. The newbies' defensiveness was irritating to me, too, but I think it's pretty much a draw at this point.
|
"One ticket to Washington, please. I have a date with destiny."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Maflynn
omg, you mean to tell me they're actually posting here at MacNN? What is this world coming to. We should ban everyone and not allow any new posts.
Yes, you are right We definitely need more of this in the Lounge:
Originally Posted by lyanma
i know a bunch of guys liked it too, but more girls than boys seem to like it, so im just telling that guy to stop being homophobic cuz there are a lot of girls posting<3 (:
Originally Posted by iLoveYouNOT
hellooooooooooooo =) <3<3<3 this movie , even tho i might be the only girl thinkin ed cullen isnt hot -_-
Originally Posted by karolie
oh oh ladiessss !!!
Looks like sek929 and turtle777 dont feel "comfortable " around girls :O
maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan to badddddd
because we are staying forever and ever and ever and ever aaaaaaaaaaaand ever .. like Sherk and Fiona
so yes .. you guys are stuck with us
Happy new year by the way
ohoh and YES we use mac.
And No! we are not spam
Originally Posted by karolie
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhh !!
hold her back (h)
moahahahahahah !
btw. i agree with Carla <3
Originally Posted by karolie
HERE: Carla V's Fan Club
yay ! <3
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Their posts reek of myspace/AIM asshattery...I'm sorry but that sh!t won't fly here.
For all Simon's concern about this being a strictly tech-related forum he's been very welcoming of these 'members' even though they joined to defend a movie in the lounge. Seems to me like he is siding with them simply because they annoy members he's annoyed with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
Originally Posted by Simon
I read this every single time somebody I suggests a change here.
That's better.
I was SO going to do the exact same post!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by sek929
For all Simon's concern about this being a strictly tech-related forum he's been very welcoming of these 'members' even though they joined to defend a movie in the lounge. Seems to me like he is siding with them simply because they annoy members he's annoyed with.
Well hey, the result of that thread was that a majority of the people who voiced their opinion was in favor of the lounge an all the non-tech social baloney in there. I think the thread in question here is an excellent example of the consequences. That's the flip side of allowing a lot of personal nonsense in what should be a board first and foremost about the Mac.
And for the record, I'm siding with nobody. I do support the 100 post idea which would prevent total newcomers from posting in the lounge. That's it. But quite honestly, I'm greatly amused when the same people who regularly trash talk other members suddenly take so much offense when noobs act according to that example. I am really enjoying the drama.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
I do support the 100 post idea which would prevent total newcomers from posting in the lounge.
Maybe we should think of the Lounge as a privilege, not a right.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Well hey, the result of that thread was that a majority of the people who voiced their opinion was in favor of the lounge an all the non-tech social baloney in there. I think the thread in question here is an excellent example of the consequences. That's the flip side of allowing a lot of personal nonsense in what should be a board first and foremost about the Mac.
And for the record, I'm siding with nobody. I do support the 100 post idea which would prevent total newcomers from posting in the lounge. That's it. But quite honestly, I'm greatly amused when the same people who regularly trash talk other members suddenly take so much offense when noobs act according to that example. I am really enjoying the drama.
No, you're misinterpreting our irritation. I never complained about anyone trash-talking. I complained about new members posting utter garbage - see turtle's post for examples. I don't care if it's off-topic, if it's insulting, or if it's rude, as long as I know where it's coming from. But when new members join and post with such poor spelling, grammar, formatting, and content something should be done.
Also, one poster has openly admitted to lying about being 13 or older.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Maybe we should think of the Lounge as a privilege, not a right.
Sounds reasonable.
How about a privilege people earn after they have displayed mature, civil and amicable behavior?
Of course, I know that it won't be long before somebody lectures me that
a) this would destroy the board
b) civil discussions are lame
c) I'm worse than Hitler
But I've heard all of those several times already. And it's becoming somewhat boring. So I would really appreciate it if the rebuttals showed a bit more originality this time.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
Also, one poster has openly admitted to lying about being 13 or older.
Say it aint so!
I have this bad feeling that might not be the only lie that has been told on this board.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Say it aint so!
I have this bad feeling that might not be the only lie that has been told on this board.
That's probably true; however, the board's management needs to act on that, because they might be in trouble if something bad happens. Say this girl gets her feelings hurt, and the parents are a litigious bunch - voila, recipe for trouble.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Night's Plutonian shore...
Status:
Offline
|
|
I will point out that this isn't the first time this has happened here. There have been instances in the past where a thread attracts outside attention, and a bunch of people from another forum rush in and register so they could make their view known. They usually don't stick around long. Some do stay, and there is one I can think of that did and remained a pain in the nether regions for a good long time. Others have stayed and been contributing members. I really think the Twilight fans will lose interest soon enough. I would appreciate it if someone would be so kind as to PM me the user name of the person that was dumb enough to post that they lied about their age so that can be handled.
And of course, as always, the same rules apply to the noobs as apply to you mob. If they are derailing posts or posting personal attacks or any other such verboten nonsense, hit the report post button and they will be dealt with.
|
Nemo me impune lacesset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Of course, I know that it won't be long before somebody lectures me that
a) this would destroy the board
b) civil discussions are lame
c) I'm worse than Hitler
But I've heard all of those several times already. And it's becoming somewhat boring. So I would really appreciate it if the rebuttals showed a bit more originality this time.
A 100 post limit would most certainly destroy the lounge. 15 to 20 posts, tops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dr. Wahnsinn
Also looks like Cold Warrior is already on it.
Where did you see that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Person Man
Where did you see that?
I believe that remark was in reference to my comment on the suspicion that they weren't legit members.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Night's Plutonian shore...
Status:
Offline
|
|
The age issue has been dealt with and referred to the admins for final determination. Thank you for your cooperation. You may now return to whatever the hell it is you people do.
|
Nemo me impune lacesset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ThinkInsane
You may now return to whatever the hell it is you people do.
Best post of the decade™
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
What I think is lame is getting worked up over this stuff. What if the next Dakar, Laminar, turtle, shifuimam, osiris, or besson3c comes from this Twilight forum place? You never know, they may not all be MySpace asshats (although I highly doubt that any of them are as awesome as me).
But more importantly than this, it really doesn't matter a whole lot. Micro-managing this forum just requires waaayy too much effort, and it's almost always wasted and misdirected energy. Just treat this place like your play place, and treat your toys with respect. This is only a forum, after all, where none of this really matters a whole lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|