|
|
10.6.3
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brooklyn, yo...
Status:
Offline
|
|
10.6.3 update is out-
Here's link to Combo.
(784MB)
Here's link to incremental.
enjoy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Seattle
Status:
Offline
|
|
Installed here. No obvious changes, except that Safari's "Top Sites" seems to finally be glitch free (so far).
|
Trust me. I'm a Taco.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm hoping it fixes 10.6.3 Server LDAP corruption and crashing. I'm still stuck on 10.6 Server until I can use 10.6 with Time Machine.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm hoping it'll fix printing issues with the Color LaserJet 3600 over Broadcom wireless chipsets.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm hoping it'll fix that no PPC support problem.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
No issues here, except that it uninstalled the Canon Printer Driver update that I did two days ago. Is it just me or is accessing the iDisk via Finder and apps like iWork a lot faster? That could be because they did heavy maintenance the other day though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Didn't fix the LaserJet 3600 printing problem (which apparently affects the 1022 as well). It's all HP's retarded host based drivers.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by olePigeon
Didn't fix the LaserJet 3600 printing problem (which apparently affects the 1022 as well). It's all HP's retarded host based drivers.
I haven't had a decent experience with a HP printer and OS X for the longest time...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm out of the country at the moment. Can someone please check exactly how large the OpenGL update was? Did it include a GLSL update? Last I saw in the betas, it had all of OpenGL 3.0 except the GLSL update.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Georgetown, TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
AFAIK, 10.6.3 breaks SmartScroll. Or, has anyone had different results?
|
Harv
27" i7 iMac (10.10.3), iPhone 5 (iOS 8.3)
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just updated m 2.5.3 Mini and all went as expected with no problems. Took maybe 20 minutes or less start to finish.
I do wish these updates would not reinstall all the language files that I so painstakingly removed previously.
Forgot to mention I did the Combo Update downloaded from Apple
(
Last edited by Douglashh; Mar 29, 2010 at 09:26 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
As usual for my primary machine (Core i7 iMac), I'll wait a while before installing, and will let you guys (and my laptop) be the guinea pigs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status:
Offline
|
|
Funny, the Nighthawks desktop picture is much better now, you can appreciate the different hues and lush colors. See comparison below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by besson3c
Grr, best hold off rebooting then.
Edit: Actually I don't really care. It's rare that I write to my Windows 7 partition, I can live without.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Rebooted, MacFUSE & NTFS-3G still working fine over here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by seanc
Rebooted, MacFUSE & NTFS-3G still working fine over here
The problem affects 64 bit SL kernels, I believe. If Macfusion worked out of the box for you without having to delete the nosshdelay.so SSH workaround, I don't think you are affected, and NTFS might be a totally separate animal altogether.
Don't quote me on this, I'm pretty confused on much of this. SSHfs works great when you can get it installed and working as it is supposed to, but right now it's kind of a mess when you factor in the 32/64 bit kernels, the MacFUSE betas designed to work in Snow Leopard, etc.
(
Last edited by besson3c; Mar 30, 2010 at 05:44 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yep, you're right.
Booted into 64bit mode, not working.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by seanc
Yep, you're right.
Booted into 64bit mode, not working.
What version of MacFUSE do you have? Perhaps it is worth just booting back into the 32 bit kernel and possibly downgrading if the precompiled sshfs build I'm using gives me troubles...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
2.1.5 Beta
Just wondering, what advantage does booting into 64 bit mode give you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by seanc
2.1.5 Beta
Just wondering, what advantage does booting into 64 bit mode give you?
None for me personally, although it might a very wee bit if I used VMWare Fusion, I don't know... I was just screwing around one day and booted into 64 bit mode and left it that way.
Still, I'm not able to get Macfusion to work in 32 bit either. You?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Georgetown, TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
According to the developer, an updated SmoothScroll is to be released on 31 March.
That seems like fast support...
|
Harv
27" i7 iMac (10.10.3), iPhone 5 (iOS 8.3)
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
What I want to know is whether developers are actually able to test their software with new kernel versions before they are released to the public?
I grow ever-so-tired of the release, break, fix cycle with various shims and OS X add-ons. Either Apple needs to make prereleases freely available if not so already, or else they need to support sanctioned ways to develop kernel extensions, Safari add-ons, and the like that won't constantly break, or else they need to break up some of their fixes into pieces outside of these big point updates so that if we want the fix we can get it without having to update the OS constantly and go through this aforementioned cycle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
There have been multiple developer builds since January. As of a few weeks ago, membership is only $99/yr.
|
Vandelay Industries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Art Vandelay
There have been multiple developer builds since January. As of a few weeks ago, membership is only $99/yr.
What good is paying $99 so you can access point updates that might change going to do in this case? The kernel development needs to be open so that developers can be in open communication with the developers so that they are aware of what changes are being planned, how to prepare for them, etc. I take back what I said, Apple needs to do more than simply make these pre-releases available. The pre-releases are useful for testing the OS X update itself and helping Apple catch bugs, but not so great for coming up with a strategy to make the appropriate updates to your software and put it on a sustainable path that ensures its long term stability.
Plus, you could also make the argument that $99 for the privilege of developing software for OS X is rather lame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apple doesn't develop in a very open way. It's not Linux. And Apple certainly isn't going to change that anytime soon.
The solution is to not apply every update as soon as it comes out. While you hold back, developers can update their stuff. You apply the OS update once you know updates for the apps/kexts/etc. you require are available.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Apple doesn't develop in a very open way. It's not Linux. And Apple certainly isn't going to change that anytime soon.
The solution is to not apply every update as soon as it comes out. While you hold back, developers can update their stuff. You apply the OS update once you know updates for the apps/kexts/etc. you require are available.
That's always the solution no matter what OS you are dealing with, but my point is that if you want certain fixes included in the update you can't just install these, it's all or nothing, and these point updates are usually pretty substantial and therefore require a fair amount of time to test in advance.
Plus, it is not always practical to Google every piece of software you count on to ensure that it works with the point update. I read over the 10.6.3 update description and there was nothing in there (unless I missed it) that suggested a potential problem with Macfusion. The point updates are therefore almost always a gamble to install, you sort of have to cross your fingers and hope for the best (or have a working mirror of your setup in a VM in the case of OS X Server). For OS X Server especially the software update mechanism is frankly completely retarded for a server OS.
What I'm proposing is breaking up the updates into smaller pieces and documenting precisely what they are. If I could have held off on the kernel update I would have, I didn't need that. A lot of intelligence could be built into this system that isn't there right now. For instance, if you enable Apache the updater could offer to update Apache with newer versions, or backports of fixes.
In OSes like Redhat, you don't always get new versions of services, but you get backports of important bug and security fixes. In OS X I have absolutely no idea whether version x of whatever open source component is the stock version or a version with fixes. If I run a web server on OS X Server and use Apple's bundled software I might want to know these things!
Obviously this example is far more server oriented, but Apple could at least dumb this down a great deal and push out various pieces with some sort of weighted importance as these fixes are available, rather than waiting for the next massive point update. Obviously having more patches to install looks bad, and perhaps creates some support issues, but on the other hand it might make support a little easier in some cases. How many times do we see cryptic reports like "OS version 10.x.x broke such and such" and how often do people suggest voodoo like suggestions such as installing combo updates and such? The problem is that people don't really know what they installed. If, on the other hand, a problem happened immediately after a particular update, it should be clearer as to what was installed that caused the problem.
Plus, with the current way there is no way to downgrade. This is also a problem. I don't really know why Apple doesn't provide this option now, but I would assume that there is less that can go wrong rolling back, say, an update to iCal than an update to an entire point update.
I don't mean to blow these problems out of proportion. For the most part the Apple way works great, until it doesn't. I just don't understand why Apple has set the bar so low in their whole software update mechanism. If nothing more, making it a little more intelligent will make OS X Server a better product.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by angelmb
Funny, the Nighthawks desktop picture is much better now, you can appreciate the different hues and lush colors. See comparison below:
The gamma settings have not changed?
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status:
Offline
|
|
Gamma value of 2.2 as by default. Prior to Snow Leopard it was 1.8.
Actually, the picture it is quite different from what came with 10.6.0, 10.6.1 or 10.6.2. Which is great cause the older one had an horrid 'inkjet printer from the 90s' quality.
Spot the differences !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
I see Apple hasn't lost its attention to detail yet ... it's nicer now, the picture.
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I know the Combo update has its own web page (and it's in Software Update), but is there a reason the update is NOT listed on the Mac OS X Updates page?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Does this update fix the problem where multitouch stops working after every other reboot?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
What do you mean? I've not heard of this problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status:
Offline
|
|
I get that on my 2009 MBP. About every other reboot, the multitouch trackpad won't do anything more than track. No swipe, scroll or right-click.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
Weird. No problems here on mine, no matter what software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: White Plains, NY, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have been having serious issues with OS X 10.6.3 on 2 MacBook Pros 13" & 15". I think most are coming from Conflict Notifier but I'm getting constant beach balling and it hangs the whole computer. I had no problems before the update but both have had this issue the past few days since I updated.
|
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
Try the combo update? Repair disk permissions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: White Plains, NY, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I had run disk maintenance and cleared caches but it didn't really help. I had to manually remove some old duplicate calendar entries from 2003 to have any effect.
|
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
For those also stuck with the 10.6.3/Macfusion incompatibility problems, you can download the Macfusion 2.0.4 prerelease via the link posted here or my Twitter feed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Unfortunately it doesn't fix the Time Machine problems we're having. Now instead of the server freezing, the clients freeze. Extremely frustrating.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|