Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > macOS > MyBook Studio Firewire FAIL

MyBook Studio Firewire FAIL
Thread Tools
moook
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2011, 07:03 AM
 
Hi all,

Just get to know this forum and found lots of discussion that help a lot.. Thanks
By the way, I have my own question regarding Mac.

I am getting a MyBook Studio 1TB ext hdd, format into FAT32 because need to use for both laptop [mac for myself, window for company]. I found out that if im transferring file which contain more than 3 or 4GB [lots of file]. It will start copy and hang in the middle.
You can see "12minute remaining", if you click the cross to cancel, it still hang it there unless you force shut down. This make me getting a firewire ext hdd but not using it.
Do anyone know what happen is this?

And today i am getting a 2TB Studio. Wish to try with HFS+ format because I heard that firewire 800 only can work properly if Hdd format in HFS+ ?

hope to get some feedback because I walk in to many shops and no one really know what is this about ~

Appreciate and Thanks
     
moook  (op)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2011, 07:19 AM
 
I have done a experiment just now ~

19.06GB (1583 files)

Transfer to 2TB HFS+ format ext hdd [Mybook studio 2TB]
- Firewire 800 need 10min only
- USB need 15min

Transfer to 1TB FAT32 format ext hdd
(format this because got window laptop need to access) [Mybook Studio 1TB]
- Firewire 800 need 16min
- USB need 28 min

I have a question which is, is it ext hdd for mac use need to format to HFS+ for better performance?
     
Spheric Harlot
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2011, 11:18 AM
 
Firewire is irrelevant to the reliability of the transfer — it's just quite a lot faster than USB, as you have discovered.

The only issue here is that FAT32 SUCKS. It is ancient and all but obsolete except for small formats like USB sticks.

It has no support for large file sizes, and filenames with special characters in them will break a file transfer, as will files nested in folders within folders within folders where the TOTAL length of the file path (incl. the name of the file) exceeds a certain number of characters.

Unless you need to use the disk with pre-SP3 versions of Windows XP or earlier Windows versions, DO NOT use FAT32 for an external hard drive.

Use ExFAT instead for drives that need to be regularly accessed under both Windows and Macintosh.
     
angelmb
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2011, 03:30 PM
 
Isn't the default cluster size for exFAT kind of big to use for a hard disk.? I had tried to format an external hard disk with exFAT but it ended wasting a lot of valuable hard disk space.

What I did was to format the external hard disk as NTFS and use Paragon NTFS for Mac OS X so I can write stuff to that hard disk under Mac OS X.

Needless to say, if you are going to use the external hard disk exclusively with a Mac, use HFS+ instead.
     
moook  (op)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2011, 03:47 PM
 
Thanks a lot to Spheric Harlot and angelmb

As a summary of what you both mention ~

FAT32
- file size alone cannot exceed 4gb
- large file size or filename with special characters will break the transfer
[my problems might be cause by this]
- can use in mac and window

exFAT
- better than FAT32
- can use in mac and window
- but wasting lot of valuable hard disk space

NTFS
- better that both FAT
- only can use in window
- need to use Paragon NTFS for mac only can write file

HFS+
- better a lot to all FAT
- only can use in mac

My break transfer might cause by big file or special character. Thank you a lot for the advise.
I have been asking a lot of computer shop and even apple center, no one can really help me on this.
They will only said "your laptop firewire port spoil, your ext hdd firewire port spoil, your firewire cable spoil". Hahahaha
     
Spheric Harlot
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2011, 04:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by moook View Post
Thanks a lot to Spheric Harlot and angelmb

As a summary of what you both mention ~

FAT32
- file size alone cannot exceed 4gb
- large file size or filename with special characters will break the transfer
[my problems might be cause by this]
- can use in mac and window

exFAT
- better than FAT32
- can use in mac and window
- but wasting lot of valuable hard disk space

NTFS
- better that both FAT
- only can use in window
- need to use Paragon NTFS for mac only can write file

HFS+
- better a lot to all FAT
- only can use in mac
Excellent summary. I would add

The Mac can read NTFS, but to read/write NTFS under Mac, you need Paragon NTFS or equivalent software.

Stock Windows cannot read or write HFS+, but you can install MacDrive under Windows to enable full HFS+ support.
     
moook  (op)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2011, 05:09 PM
 
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot View Post
Excellent summary. I would add

The Mac can read NTFS, but to read/write NTFS under Mac, you need Paragon NTFS or equivalent software.

Stock Windows cannot read or write HFS+, but you can install MacDrive under Windows to enable full HFS+ support.
THanks again Spheric..

So.. MacDrive is a software for window to read HFS+ format right?
     
Spheric Harlot
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2011, 05:12 PM
 
read and write, correct.

You're most welcome.
     
P
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2011, 06:26 PM
 
A few more points:

* Boot camp will add a read-only driver for HFS+ to any Windows installation you create with it.
* You can get a free NTFS driver for Mac using MacFUSE, although it has limitations - the main being that it's slow.
* Parallels desktop will mount any NTFS partition as read/write, and I suspect that VMware Fusion will do the same.
* The free software HFSexplorer can read (but not write) HFS volumes from Windows.
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
     
moook  (op)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 2, 2011, 01:31 AM
 
Thanks again Spheric Harlot

hi P, thanks for you info as well.

Will decide to format into HFS+ since i stick more in Mac. Will try around the software soon..

Appreciate much to have bro and sis for the advise ~
     
besson3c
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 2, 2011, 05:29 AM
 
You don't need Paragon to write NTFS, you can use a FUSE based file system such as NTFS 3G
     
besson3c
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 2, 2011, 05:32 AM
 
Originally Posted by P View Post
* You can get a free NTFS driver for Mac using MacFUSE, although it has limitations - the main being that it's slow..

an OS X implementation of Linux FUSE is indeed required for NTFS-3G, but don't download MacFUSE because MacFUSE has been abandoned and the last version released doesn't work with Lion (although there is a patched version you can find in the mailing list archives). Instead, use one of the successors to MacFUSE such as OSXFuse or Fuse4x.
     
moook  (op)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 4, 2011, 12:11 PM
 
Thanks Besson3c for the advice ~

Another question for bro and sis here..
2TB hdd.. with partition and without partition..
what is the different?
i use to partition my hdd always.. but friend said this not good that not good.. but actually they not clear also.. haha.. so hope can get some advise here ~
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,