|
|
How many of us use OS X?
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
Out of those of us who are designers or creative pros,
How many of us work in OS X?
Please answer like this...
I used OS X 60-65%
OS 9 35-40%
OS 9 needed mainly because of Quark, 2 photoshop plug-ins
and need drivers for my hardware. I could live without the plug-ins
and do alright with Quark (or use InDesign instead), buy my main problem is lack of hardware drivers.
Now what's your experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
At home: 100%
At work: 0%
Mainly due to hardware issues, Quark (mainly) and pshop. Its not software upgrade season for us, nor is it hardware upgrade season. Then, there is the whole training issue for the networking/tech support folk, and other non osx familiar designers (not to mention ad reps, accounting, etc we have a 95% mac office). We are planning to go X sometime around March-June next year however.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: somewhere in ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home...100%.
Work...95%. A couple of the Macs still have 9.2 on them, mainly for Quark and a few PS plugins as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home 100%
Work 100%
I am given the choice to use whatever I want... I decided Screw Quark and went to InDesign. So far so good.
Mac Guru
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home 80% (damn you Quark!)
Work 0% (Ugh, old G3 would be a slug with OSX)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Heaven
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Krakatoa, East of Java
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home: 100%
Work: 100% (with Quark running in classic)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: East of Belfast Furry Animal Sanctuary
Status:
Offline
|
|
80% X Home/work
(only need to switch back for GoLive5 and Quark!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oregon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home 100%
Work: 0%
Waiting for Quark, Rampage Client, Preps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
100 %, OSX All the way !!! (the hell with Quark go InDesign ! (until the new version maybe...))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: adequate, thanks.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
home 0%
work 0%
Old macs at the house
Quark 5 use at work. Besides everything runs ROCK SOLID in 9.1.
Eric Henao
|
Eric Henao - Graphic Designer
Dual 2.5 GHz G5 - 2.5 GB RAM - OS 10.3.7
and TECHNO music!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: .CL
Status:
Offline
|
|
Mac OS X 100%
Photoshop 7, GoLive 6, InDesign 2, Illustrator 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: North Dakota, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home: 90%
Work: 50%
I'll be able to do a lot more work in X once the speed is better - right now, tho, using programs like DreamWeaver and FireWorks are just plain hindering in their lack of speed.
Once I upgrade the iBook to a TiBook (or a special edition G4 iBook if the rumors are true!) and upgrade the beige G3 to a New-Cube G4 (I can dream, can't I?), then it'll be OS X 100%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Status:
Offline
|
|
hey funk boy, with a card from Power Logix pretty soon you'll be able to make that a Ghz cube
in your dreams of course <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
Myself, I use OS 9 about 75% of the time, and 25% in OS X, but then again I've got a G3 proccessor, at 333Mhz. Soooooooo it's understandable. Not to mention all my apps are old, Fireworks 3, Dreamweaver 3, Flash 5, FreeHand 9, no cash to upgrade.
Once I get a proccessor upgrade, I might update my software with an edu discounted package
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: College in the Land of Oz
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home: 100% OS X
Work: Converting office to an OS X base, up to 80% for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
OS X: 100% (Don't even have 9 installed :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
home: 100%
work: 0% (although will install X soon, now that we have FCP3 and Photoshop 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: "Joisey" Home of the "Guido" and chicks with "Big Hair"
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home: 0% - 5% (might be more if I was running something newer).
Work: 0% (although I'm currently between jobs, they did not use OSX at all at the last two pre-press/production firms I worked in).
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tempe, AZ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Work: 90% OSX 10% Classic, I wish Apple got its act together on the printing issues. There is still no support for custom page sizes in OSX. How am I supposed to plot posters without drivers? I know that driver do not come from Apple, but HP cannot write plotter drivers, because OSX does not support custom paper sizes. This is what I was told.
Argh!!!
At home...100% OSX.
LOVE IT!!!!
t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Mac OS X : Home : 80% (Music software still in OS 9 )
Mac OS X : Work : 80% (Apple (lol) QTVR Authoring Studio and custom page size printing on the HP keeping me back, too)
J
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: somewhere in ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by t_hah:
<strong>Work: 90% OSX 10% Classic, I wish Apple got its act together on the printing issues. There is still no support for custom page sizes in OSX. How am I supposed to plot posters without drivers? I know that driver do not come from Apple, but HP cannot write plotter drivers, because OSX does not support custom paper sizes. This is what I was told.
Argh!!!
At home...100% OSX.
LOVE IT!!!!
t</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">I think with the licensing of CUPS, we might actually get custom paper sizes. Either that or wider printer support...I get so confused on that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
100 % OSX (I trashed OS9 this friday )
only annoying think in OSX: no custom paper sizes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Land of the Easily Amused
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home: 85% (haven't bought PS 7 or FCP3 yet)
Work: 90% (haven't bought InDesign 2 or PS 7 yet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Mac OS X 100% I actually just happen to have GoLive 6 and ImageReady 7 running right now. I have all the new apps. I think they are great. I never even boot classic. I love X. The only thing I have noticed is that the GUI in Adobe's new Carbon apps is very slow. It might do the work fast, but clicking menus and buttons and selecting tools and zooming, it all seems to work very slowly. Hopefully that will improve in time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: san diego
Status:
Offline
|
|
WORK 99% (GOT A G3 print server for big projects)
HOME 60% (redraw sucks on my Tibook 550 in PSD 7, gotta use OS9)
hope 10.2 kicks ass so I can go 100% @ home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Sar Chasm
Status:
Offline
|
|
Work: OS X 75% Classic 20% (Quark) OS 9 5% (Photoshop plug-ins that won't work in Classic)
Home OS X 90% Classic 10%. I only boot 9 at home for a few of the kid's old games, and to run TechTool and Disk Warrior.
CV
|
When a true genius appears in the world you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. -- Jonathan Swift.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SF
Status:
Offline
|
|
gonna wait and see how Jaguar looks b4 i finally make the switch on my home/work mac...although I do use it regularly at my IT job on campus
|
~DJG3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home: OS X 100%
Work: OS X 100%
The only reason Classic is installed is because it is required to install Extensis Suitcase -_-
|
15" PowerBook G4 1.5 GHZ w/ 128MB VRAM
512MB DDR SDRAM 1 SODIMM
80GB 5400 RPM HD
Mac OS X 10.3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NJ, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home 100% (got to love Photoshop and GoLive under OSX)
Work 100% (My computer, but I do Mac repair so I still see a lot of OS 9)
It hurts my eyes to boot back into OS 9 - that pain, the PAIN!!!!
ok... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
-Steve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Portland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Until recently, Quark 4 & Photoshop 5 under classic about 50% of the time, and directly booted into OS9 the other half of the time.
After my Adobe Design Collection arrives later this week, I'll be pure X, for all my graphic work!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver CO
Status:
Offline
|
|
X - 110% at home, I have dropped support for OS 9 on my home network.
Work is another story, we are having problems with office for X. Microsmack raised the fee's only about 10 times. No way we can afford to buy the upgrade, so we only have about 40 out of 500 users using X.
In my opinon, X is the best upgrade I have ever seen. It is what win2k was to win98 and a whole lot more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Up north
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home : 100% OS X
Work : 100% ?%#in' Windows 2000 pro. In august, I should have a Mac but capture card drivers will be forcing me to run OS 9.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: EU
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
work and home 100% thanks to adobe. someone should tell the guys at quark that osx has arrived!
|
bootyboy mainly on a pismo 6gb
with 320 mb ram running
macosc 10.1.5
go visit the internet waste site,
http://www.thetrashweb.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Home: 100%
Work: 100% since I left my last agency. Actually I'm trying to get my own business running - which means work is in fact O%. But that a hundred percent in OSX. :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Perkasie, Pennsylvania
Status:
Offline
|
|
100% OSX since Photoshop7/Illustrator 10 came out. GoLive 6 was essential as well. I thought I was "ahead of the game" for almost 2 months, then Apple bestows "10.2" on us - now we're all behind again (or $129 poorer.)
|
Scott "Meister" Allard
http://www.wp2.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Noo Yawk
Status:
Offline
|
|
Work 0 %
Home 85 %
Work : Notes, Photoshop, Quark, Plug-ins etc, but, more importantly waiting for Lotus Notes for OSX adoption in a highly corporate environment. Notes being the blood supply system of what is a mostly non-mac dominated corp with thousands of empls.
In above situation, with only hundreds of mac users (of all generations and genres) interfacing with print professionals it usually ends up being a move that is made when IT are so inclined, and also when the majority of staff and applications are ready, and completely adopted in the print prepress and creative pro world.
Other mac-os using co-workers are probably less inclined to adopt OSX anytime soon, meaning that date might come maybe more like 2003-2004.
---
PS. I don't think Quark is so bad -- I love an app that can be so speeded up by native keyboard shortcuts. It is in Quark's interest to move in harmony with the printing end -- it has to be right or productivity, deadlines, and bottom lines will suffer in an industry that can ill afford it. InDesign can afford to push the envelope to try to get a little market share where Quark is the industry standard, and where not meeting standards can be either extremely impractical or overly costly. I'll bet Qrk will have the real OSX goods ready and fully backwards and forwards compatible, when the time is right for everyone, printers included - not just the bleeding edge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|