 |
 |
Who here owns an Apple 23" HD Display?
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am interested in getting an Apple 23" HD Display. I just can't seem to find the actual response time on the monitor anywhere on Apple's site. Does anyone have that kind of information? Appreciate it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by IronMentality:
I am interested in getting an Apple 23" HD Display. I just can't seem to find the actual response time on the monitor anywhere on Apple's site. Does anyone have that kind of information? Appreciate it.
I have one and it is fast. 16ms is what I read at Apple's page: "Response time (typical)
16 ms" - 9th on the spec sheet.
http://www.apple.com/displays/specs.html
-Jerry C.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Get it, it's a huge improvement over the previous generation of displays. Here look at my set up.
My theather
The response time is 16ms and there's absolutely no noticeable ghosting.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The Internets
Status:
Offline
|
|
cool. But where do you put you legs when you are sitting at the desk?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
That is for the new 23" CD. I'm pretty sure the old 23" CD HD had a pixel response of 25ms.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by MindFad:
That is for the new 23" CD. I'm pretty sure the old 23" CD HD had a pixel response of 25ms.
I wasn't aware he was referring to the old one with regard to the original poster's question. The old ones it seems, Apple has never released the LCD's pixel response time publicly. I had the older 20" model and while a great display, it didn't quite have the pixel response of the new ones.
-Jerry C.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Semi Posting Retirement *ReJoice!*
Status:
Offline
|
|
lucky .... i wish i had a 23 .. possibly saving up for a aluminum one .. they are gorgeous... waiting for a price drop though ..
|
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm loving my new 23" aluminum display - I found the gamut a little cold by default, however. Even with hardware calibration, the yellows are still a little on the cool side. I upgraded from the 22" older Cinema Display, and this display is capable of violets and blues (and hues all around) with a vibrancy I've never seen on an LCD before 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: near Boulder, Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just ran Chipmunk's ID servyce on my monitors( http://www.chipmunk.nl/klantenservice/applemodel.html ) and it says my 15" ASD-LCD was made in 2001 and my 23" ACD (plastic) was made in 2003.
Both were demos at the Boulder CompUSA so I got good deals-
450 for the 15 and 1500 for the 23, both with extended 2 yr CompUSA warranty.
The 23 was a replacement for a 22 that I bought when the 23's came out. Used the warranty, had 3 dead pixels and some glass scratches from a bozo tech. They did a straight swap, including 2yr warrabty for no charge.
I am very impressed with the 23, much brighter than the 22, almost as bright as the 15, which is very sharp.
Z
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top