|
|
Buy airport now or later?
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Gig Harbor, WA USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
While I'm waiting for my iBook to arrive, I decided I'm probably going to purchase an Airport card and a Base station. The only problem is, I've heard rumors of an even better one coming out at the next MW, with a much larger distance and much faster speeds... what should I do? Airport isn't a *must*, but it would be nice...
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Garland, TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
To wait or not really depends on your needs. Present range is up to 150 ft., I believe. If that suits your distance needs then no problem. Present speed is 11 Mbps. If you plan on sharing a lot of big files locally (between systems on the airport network), then you might benefit from greater speeds. But, if you are just planning on sharing a home Internet connection -- even a relatively fast 3 Mbps maximum cable connection -- your speed bottleneck won't be airport but will be your internet connection. My DSL connection hits about 700 Mbps consistently. I have a whole lot of head room in 11 Mbps on airport, even with several systems sharing the connection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Garland, TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Pardon me, that is 700 Kbps for my DSL connection, not 700 Mbps. Just to clear that up for anyone thinking I had some sort of direct connection to an internet backbone for $50 a month!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stebahan
|
|
I have a 3 floor townhouse, about 40 feet of brick, garden and deck in the back. A front yard that really is nothing more than steps, 15 feet of yard and a sidewalk. My wife can go anywhere on our property and get about 7/8ths signal strength. I am pretty sure that even if you have cable or DSL line the Airport Base station can broadcast within the parameters without a speed hit and, sometimes it seems her modem connection is faster than my desktops connection. So, to answer your question, if you can afford it go for it. As for the rumors, if they prove to be true, the only ones that will really see a benefit will be those who have a great deal of property, I'm talking acres here, and those in institutions such as schools, businesses etc. Since the increased strength will provide greater signal strength through the dense walls, wiring, ducts, steel studs etc., of commercial buildings.
Wow, a moment of lucidity while I wait for my iBook.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
I say go for it because personally I love the thing but the rumor is there is a better one coming out but would you really need a better range then 150 ft?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Status:
Offline
|
|
--------------------
I say go for it because personally I love the thing but the rumor is there is a better one coming out but would you really need a better range then 150 ft?
-------------------
I thought about that too and was going to get by with the software base station until July. But then I started thinking; the two rumors are either 802.11a with 5 times the bandwidth but shorter range, or 802.11g with twice the bandwidth and about the same range. My DSL can't saturate my connection now, and I can walk over to all the neighbors and surf the web already with the 150 ft range.
So I just bought the hardware Base Station so I don't have to run OS 9 on the desktop anymore (no Software Base Station for OS X)
The new protocols will be great for schools and businesses, but I don't really think there's a pressing need for most people at home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Upstate, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Airport, cable modem. 75 feet from Base Station
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|