|
|
Mac Mozilla (Firefox) set to get much better (Page 2)
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
The amount of vitriol found in this thread is rather surprising.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm not a zealot. I just have no patience for people who think that Aqua widgets and draggable sheeted windows are more important than extensibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: England
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by wataru
I'm not a zealot. I just have no patience for people who think that Aqua widgets and draggable sheeted windows are more important than extensibility.
Why?
I don't use extensibility features (never felt the need). Therefore, my choice seems to be between an ugly browser and a nice-looking one, where both will do what I want them to do.
So tell me again why I should use Firefox over Safari?
Amorya
|
What the nerd community most often fail to realize is that all features aren't equal. A well implemented and well integrated feature in a convenient interface is worth way more than the same feature implemented crappy, or accessed through a annoying interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|