Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > Q: Mac mini 2.26 GHz CPU option

Q: Mac mini 2.26 GHz CPU option
Thread Tools
No Time 4 Love Dr. Jones
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 16, 2009, 12:57 PM
 
I'm about to buy a new Mac mini and install upgrades (4 GB RAM, 500 GB 7200 RPM), but was wondering about the 2.26 GHz CPU option. Is there any other technology other than a 260 MHz speed bump to it? Extra cache or something else that would make it a worthwhile upgrade? TIA.

(I searched this forum for "2.26 GHz" and "Mac mini 2.26 GHz" but got no results)
Mac mini (2009) / 4 GB / 320 GB 7200 RPM / Dell 2407WFP
     
mduell
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 16, 2009, 01:21 PM
 
P73[57]0 and P7550 have same cache, same FSB, same TDP.

267Mhz speed bump.
     
No Time 4 Love Dr. Jones  (op)
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 16, 2009, 02:53 PM
 
Thanks, mduell. I figured as much, but thought I'd ask.

And on those megahertz, hey, I was underclocking for post stability.
Mac mini (2009) / 4 GB / 320 GB 7200 RPM / Dell 2407WFP
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 17, 2009, 12:12 AM
 
post stability?

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
whereisgraeme
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 1, 2009, 02:26 AM
 
better to buy the least expensive Mini and then upgrade to 4GB ram and put a 7200 rpm drive in (like the Momentus 7200.4 at 500GB). You will benchmark out faster than the 2.26 on general or blended tests, and will only fall short on really processor chewing tasks.... if processor heavy work is what you want to do... there are more worthwhile options outside of the mini line-up.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,