|
|
iPad tethering status?
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is it possible to share the internet collection of an iPad with 3G cell service with Mac laptops and other devices?
I've come across info about this being a feature in an iOS 4.2 beta, about tethering between an iPad and an iPhone, but the current status of this capability is a little fuzzy.
Anybody?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
No.
Settings were added in b2, and removed again in b3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
No.
Settings were added in b2, and removed again in b3.
That's a drag. Props to Froyo 2.2 for beating Apple to the punch with providing this very useful feature! My next phone might be an Android phone in part because of this huge benefit.
It's confusing that tethering is advertised on AT&T's website without any caveats that I can see though... Does AT&T provide some special proprietary device to allow tethering of any of their devices or something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
What do you mean "beat Apple to the punch"?
iPhone has tethered for over a year now, while Google doesn't even HAVE a tablet OS yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
What do you mean "beat Apple to the punch"?
iPhone has tethered for over a year now, while Google doesn't even HAVE a tablet OS yet.
The iPhone supports tethering but iPad doesn't?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Okay, I didn't know that... That's a little weird and seemingly arbitrary that the iPad doesn't as well, but thanks for filling me in!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
To get iPhone tethering on AT&T you need to pay for the highest priced data plan and then pay an extra charge per month to tether.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
And permanently give up your unlimited data plan should you be lucky enough to have one.
Welcome to the AT&T experience.
The one nice thing is that AT&T is built into the iOS dictionary, so you only need to type "att" when you need sentences like...
AT&T sucks.
AT&T just dropped my call/text/MMS (choose more than one).
**** AT&T.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
What do you mean "beat Apple to the punch"?
iPhone has tethered for over a year now, while Google doesn't even HAVE a tablet OS yet.
But, that still has strings attached to it. For example, you can't tether from an iPhone to an iPad, even though you can share an Android's 3G connection with an iPad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, the iPhone can only tether via Bluetooth or USB.
With Android, you don't necessarily know whether you'll actually be able to tether at all, though, since the openness can just mean the freedom for carriers/manufacturers to lock it down and castrate it as they see fit (with important exceptions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
With Android, you don't necessarily know whether you'll actually be able to tether at all, though, since the openness can just mean the freedom for carriers/manufacturers to lock it down and castrate it as they see fit (with important exceptions).
True. For a platform that was designed to disempower the carriers, it's unfortunate that Google doesn't have the balls to prevent carrier modifications.
Well, at least I can jailbreak my iPhone and run MyWi. I'd much rather share out my 3G over WiFi than over bluetooth anyways ... so much more versatile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak
Well, at least I can jailbreak my iPhone and run MyWi. I'd much rather share out my 3G over WiFi than over bluetooth anyways ... so much more versatile.
That was the path I chose. No way was I giving up my unlimited data AND pay an extra US$20 a month for the "privilege" of tethering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak
Well, at least I can jailbreak my iPhone and run MyWi. I'd much rather share out my 3G over WiFi than over bluetooth anyways ... so much more versatile.
Originally Posted by -Q-
That was the path I chose. No way was I giving up my unlimited data AND pay an extra US$20 a month for the "privilege" of tethering.
You guys ARE aware that AT&T knows what you are doing, right ?
Deep-packet inspection, anyone ?
Just wait for them to suddenly slap you with a $$$ bill for violating their T&Cs.
Thanks, I know that AT&T can be ruthless, that's why I'm not taking the risk.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Deep packet inspection (a fancy term for watching your traffic with Wireshark), wouldn't work if you use the VPN feature of your phone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
Deep packet inspection (a fancy term for watching your traffic with Wireshark), wouldn't work if you use the VPN feature of your phone.
Yeah, but who has a setup like that ?
Very few who jailbreak and tether.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think there would be a high correlation between those who jailbreak and those who can install VPN in their home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
I think there would be a high correlation between those who jailbreak and those who can install VPN in their home.
Uhm, yeah, I highly doubt it. Jailbreaks are plug&play these days, a VPN is much more involved.
Plus, a hardware VPN router costs a lot of money. Jailbreakers are often people who wanna save money, and wouldn't spend $$$ on a hardware VPN router.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
VPN servers are free and caveman-easy. You start with "apt-get install...", and finish with "/etc/init.d/openvpn start". Isn't the jailbreaking community up to that level?
If not, we better start learning now, before we get our net newtrality ripped off.
Since when does Jailbreaking save you money?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
VPN servers are free and caveman-easy. You start with "apt-get install...", and finish with "/etc/init.d/openvpn start". Isn't the jailbreaking community up to that level?
No, of course not, because like I said, jailbreaker have/need no skills these days.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
Since when does Jailbreaking save you money?
Hang on, why did jailreaking even get mentioned again in this thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak
True. For a platform that was designed to disempower the carriers, it's unfortunate that Google doesn't have the balls to prevent carrier modifications.
if that were its goal, Google would have simply added about five sentences to the licensing agreement.
No. Android's goal is maximum marketshare and maximum advertising and services revenue - nothing more.
Apple set out to disempower the carriers. Google is doing the opposite in exchange for marketshare.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
Since when does Jailbreaking save you money?
Uhm, dude, we tethering WITHOUT paying AT&T for the tethering plan ?
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Android bent over for the manufacturers before Android's release. If Google had been looking out for their customers, their mobile OS would be GPL.
Android FAQ - Android Wiki
And if it were GPL, us the customers and the EFF would have a clear case for a class action suit in order to allow modifications of the software running on these phones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Exactly.
Except that you've fundamentally misstated who Google's customers are by implying they're the people ending up using the phones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Uhm, dude, we tethering WITHOUT paying AT&T for the tethering plan ?
-t
I thought that theming was the biggest thing among JBers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
I thought that theming was the biggest thing among JBers.
That would be news to me.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
^^^
You might wanna quote the person you're responding to.
-t
Edit: Thanks, mods, for deleting the post above mine w/o reference. Now I'm looking like I'm talking to myself
(
Last edited by turtle777; Dec 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
You can beat Apple to puree or cider, but punch has no fruit at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
I thought that theming was the biggest thing among JBers.
Back in iOS 1.x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
You can beat Apple to puree or cider, but punch has no fruit at all.
You can use a fruit bat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by besson3c
Is it possible to share the internet collection of an iPad with 3G cell service with Mac laptops and other devices?
I've come across info about this being a feature in an iOS 4.2 beta, about tethering between an iPad and an iPhone, but the current status of this capability is a little fuzzy.
Anybody?
Getting back to the point of the original post: this is where Apple is chipping away at the loyalty of diehard supporters such as myself. I can tether my iPhone to other devices, my iPad can tether to other devices, but no iPhone to iPad tethering???
To deliberately hobble a product like this, for the benefit of a few extra shillings on the 3G iPad, is a disgrace. They'd have been much better served to allow the iPad only to tether with the iPhone - that sucks people into the Apple family still further. Or should I say, it sucks either way.
|
"most people are fools, most authority is malignant, god does not exist and everything is wrong" - Ted Nelson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|