|
|
which one is your video camera?
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
I plan to buy one myself in a couple of weeks, but I d like to hear from you first, might give me some ideas!...
So, which model and the good and bad (if any) of it! ;o)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Utah
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have a panasonic AG-DVX100. Mostly used for commercial shoots. Looks nice in iChatAV tho. Love the camera for it's 24P ability. Saves a lot of telecine time. Also the 30p is nice. What's this about a consumer grade HD Camera that records on MiniDV Tape....? Hmmm.....
If you are just muckin' around, get a Canon ZR50. The're cheap and actually have pretty good image quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: McKinney, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by CIA:
If you are just muckin' around, get a Canon ZR50. The're cheap and actually have pretty good image quality.
I'll second that recommendation. I have a ZR40 and am very impressed with it. It doesn't do low light very well, though: the video is rather grainy under those conditions. It more than takes up the slack in well-lit conditions.
Recently, I've been using it to archive some VHS tapes to DVD via iMovie and iDVD and the quality has essentially been as good as if I was playing the VHS tape directly to my TV. There is a new generation of Canon ZR camcorders now, but I don't know the specs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by TheBum:
I'll second that recommendation. I have a ZR40 and am very impressed with it. It doesn't do low light very well, though: the video is rather grainy under those conditions. It more than takes up the slack in well-lit conditions.
what about ZR60? I found ZR60 is $360 on buydig.com. Is it unexpensive? (Sorry, I have no idea about video camera)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Near Antietam Creek
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by neilxu:
what about ZR60? I found ZR60 is $360 on buydig.com. Is it unexpensive? (Sorry, I have no idea about video camera)
Here is a review of the ZR65.
Quite a good price, I think. Buy a long life battery (BP-522) and use a tripod indoors.
Have fun.
|
I am stupidest when I try to be funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
thanks guyz!
I apreciate your help there....
But I dont know wich way to go...
Amazing this:
http://www.madprojects.com/panasonic/lowlight.html
But a little costy! ;o)
I thought about a JVC GR-DVP9, it s so small and I read some good reviews about it...
But again, my unextended knoledge in this area might be a major problem!... I liked it for it s size, and the specs looks ok...
http://jvc.co.uk/product.php?id=GR-D...e76868711f2068
I dont know how "far" it is from a PRO cam, but again, I don t want to run in beta eather! ;o)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: in a weapons producing nation under Jesus
Status:
Offline
|
|
I love my ZR20. We bought it a year and a half ago for $500, now you can buy them all day long for $200 on Ebay! Amazing how prices have changed. In 98 my Hi8 camera cost $1000!
$$$$$$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by zubro:
I thought about a JVC GR-DVP9, it s so small and I read some good reviews about it...
But again, my unextended knoledge in this area might be a major problem!... I liked it for it s size, and the specs looks ok...
http://jvc.co.uk/product.php?id=GR-D...e76868711f2068
I dont know how "far" it is from a PRO cam, but again, I don t want to run in beta eather! ;o)
I haven't used this model, but I had it's predecessor the DVM-90 which was top of the line when I purchased it and from my experience will not be purchasing any JVC video products in the near future. This is solely from my own experience because I know people who swear by JVC.
Personally I have been most impressed by canon and sony for consumer DV cameras. They make several models which are very "pocketable" and won't break the bank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New York
Status:
Offline
|
|
Main camera..
Sony PD150
and my back up camera...
Sony VX2000
Two of the best cameras I have ever owned/used. And I've used a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Has anyone used the Canon Optura 20 (or 10)? I've been looking at these, and they seem to be pretty good for the money (~$650 with shipping/tax from respectable online sources for the Optura 20). I used one for a little bit at the Apple store near here, and it seemed pretty nice. Fairly compact (especially compared to the GL2 next to it, which is a bit over my price range) and the video quality seemed quite good. The apple stores are lit like hospitals, though, so that's not exactly average lighting conditions. Anyone recommend this camera?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have the Optura Pi which is a fantastic camera. Color rendition, useability, focus speed, etc are all great, but Its single greatest feature is has optical image stabilization (the lens in housed in a liquid casing, not to be confused with "image stabilization" which is a digital incarnation) so even hand held shots with careful stepping, or shots from the car, appear incredibly stable. When I show my movie to friends familiar with hand held video shooting, they always comment after seeing such steady images that they "really should carry a tripod", and then I tell them it was hand held. Unfortunately, I don't think the later versions have Optical image stabilization. If your familiar with home movies, then you know that jumpy footage may induce motion sickness to the audience. In general, I am extremely pleased with Canon's digital cameras - really very nice. If I were going to buy a camera today, I would definitely get a camera with optical image stabilization but I worry it may now only be available on very large cameras.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Near Antietam Creek
Status:
Offline
|
|
The Pi is a great camera. I search on eBay for 'em a bit, but haven't pulled the trigger.
The Optura 200 (or any of the Opturas other than the 10/20) has optical stabilization--as does original Elura (not the 2, 2MC, 10 or 20MC). Spend the extra bucks--I wish I did (though the Pi at the time was $500 more than the ZR-10 that I purchased).
(
Last edited by scottiB; Jul 10, 2003 at 12:12 AM.
)
|
I am stupidest when I try to be funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
yeah, i was leaning towards the Optura 200, mainly because of the optical stabilization, but the cheapest it can be found online is around $750 with shipping... a bit on the expensive side. Also, i much prefer the horizontal orientation of the Optura 10/20 than the vertical orientation of the 200... I guess it all depends on how much the parents contribute, though
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York City
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've always been a Canon fan. Especially when it comes to the consumer gear. Today I got this, however:
$2000 US
It does naitive 16:9, got 3 CCDs, pretty small considering how powerful it is. Takes 1.07 megapixel stills onto Sony MemorySticks. It has a touch screen (3.5" active matrix beautiful LCD) It also has a really decent shotgun mic on a vibration-isolated mount (cutting down on the camera picking up it's own motor noises). I haven't gotten to go out and shoot anything on it yet, but here is a picture quality comparison between the PDX10 and the PD 150.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|