Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Intel designing new chip architecture

Intel designing new chip architecture
Thread Tools
macintologist
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Smallish town in Ohio
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 27, 2006, 09:33 PM
 
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1942097,00.asp

Intel Takes New Tack to Cut Power Consumption
By John G. Spooner
March 27, 2006

Be the first to comment on this article


With energy efficiency creeping up enterprises' evaluation criteria list, Intel knew it couldn't afford to allow its future chips to use more power.

The Santa Clara, Calif., company went back to the drawing board to create a new chip architecture—a replacement for the circuitry that underpins its entire x86 product line—that would both increase performance and cut power consumption.

"Energy is on everyone's mind," said Intel Chief Technology Officer Justin Rattner during a keynote at the March Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco, where he announced the architecture. "There's a fundamental tension here between performance and energy consumed. It's a classic trade-off."

Touting greater energy efficiency—and, no doubt, attempting to thwart Advanced Micro Devices, which has been making headway in servers as of late—Intel will roll out three dual-core chips based on the new Intel Core Microarchitecture later this year.

At the heart of the circuitry is an idea that Intel's chips shouldn't necessarily be faster—indeed, speedier chips also generally consume more power—but that they should get more work done per clock cycle.

One major change along these lines was the addition of the ability to execute four instructions in a single clock cycle.

"That has given us the ability to get more done in fewer cycles," said Rattner. "By doing so, we consume less power."

Intel also chose to use a 14-stage pipeline, and designers cut onboard cache access times and beefed up the ways in which data is prefetched from system memory to ensure that processor cores aren't kept waiting.

Pipeline length is an important factor for processor performance as well as for power consumption. But longer pipelines breed higher clock speeds, meaning those chips might use more power.

Intel therefore sought to strike a balance. The 14-stage pipeline is slightly longer than the "Banias" architecture behind the company's Core Duo notebook chip, which has 12 stages. But it's still about half the length of later Pentium 4 processors, which process only between one and three instructions per clock cycle.

Several other Intel Core Microarchitecture features serve to get more done per clock cycle, said Rattner, including speedier Intel SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) multimedia instruction processing and consolidating certain small instructions to process as one.

Another trick allows the parts of a chip that are not needed immediately to shut down to save power, Rattner added.

The new architecture will allow chips such as Intel's dual-core "Woodcrest" server processor, due in the third quarter, to offer a 35 percent reduction in power consumption with an 80 percent bump in performance over the current Xeon DP processor, Rattner said.
     
FireWire
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Montréal, Québec (Canada)
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2006, 06:45 AM
 
Originally Posted by macintologist
At the heart of the circuitry is an idea that Intel's chips shouldn't necessarily be faster—indeed, speedier chips also generally consume more power—but that they should get more work done per clock cycle.
"Well guys, it looks like we cannot use the Megahertz myth at our advantage now, what if we build more efficient chips, following the philosophy of the PowerPC (RISC) or AMD?"
     
Binarymix
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2006, 06:55 AM
 
They've already been using lower clocked chips in their most recent offerings, albeit doubling the core, it seems the public just doesn't pay attention anymore. New is better no matter what to the sheep.
     
Kevin
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2006, 08:25 AM
 
Yeah the mhz rating is still used, but less payed attention to now. It's just PART of the equation.
     
wdlove
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2006, 06:09 PM
 
I'm just looking forward to it making our beloved Mac even better. Go Intel!

"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
     
production_coordinator
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2006, 06:22 PM
 
I think you are going to see an alarming number of dual processor systems in the near future. The GHz race is silly IMHO.

Be Inc. said it many years ago... why use one $500 cpu when you can use four $125 cpus.
     
Binarymix
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2006, 07:53 PM
 
Originally Posted by production_coordinator
I think you are going to see an alarming number of dual processor systems in the near future. The GHz race is silly IMHO.

Be Inc. said it many years ago... why use one $500 cpu when you can use four $125 cpus.
Why use four $125 CPU's when you can use ten $500 CPU's?!?! bwahahaha.


A deca-core CPU would be Uber-cool. Sounds wicked too!
     
Binarymix
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2006, 07:53 PM
 
Oh right... the money thing.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,