|
|
Who's running MS Office on an Intel Mac?
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
I was wondering if those of you who are running Microsoft Office on an Intel-based back could provide some feedback.
My main application I use is Word, and I am concerned about switching to a new Intel mac.
Do you find any differences using Word (or Excel, etc) on an Intel Mac vs a G4 or G5? Slower> Faster? No difference?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cambridge UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I had a quick play with it at my local Mac reseller; launching the app is noticeably slower, but once open it seems ok.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Georgetown, TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
At MacWorld, when the Intel machines were announced, M$/MacBusinessUnit stated they were scheduled to release a free Intel updater in March.
When that happens, things should speed up significantly.
|
Harv
27" i7 iMac (10.10.3), iPhone 5 (iOS 8.3)
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by pendragon
At MacWorld, when the Intel machines were announced, M$/MacBusinessUnit stated they were scheduled to release a free Intel updater in March.
When that happens, things should speed up significantly.
No, they didn't. And they never will:
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/default...pid=macIntelQA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Status:
Offline
|
|
I read that the next version of MS Office will be for existing platforms and only the one thereafter will be for Intel Macs.
Is it a major project for them or are they just being slow?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Skeptik
I read that the next version of MS Office will be for existing platforms and only the one thereafter will be for Intel Macs.
Read Microsoft's own FAQ about it which timmerk posted:
Q. Will the next version of Office run on both PowerPC-based Macs and Intel-based Macs?
A. Yes. The next version of Office for Mac will be a Universal application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Georgetown, TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I just watched the QT version and indeed I misquoted quoted Roz Ho, The GM of the M$ MacBusiness Unit.
What I should have said (she said) is that "M$ is on track to deliver a Universal Binary version of Office and Messenger (free)... during March..."
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/mwsf06/
Her presentation begins at 1:24:30
|
Harv
27" i7 iMac (10.10.3), iPhone 5 (iOS 8.3)
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by pendragon
What I should have said (she said) is that "M$ is on track to deliver a Universal Binary version of Office and Messenger (free)... during March..."
No, she didn't say that. She said "M$ is on track to deliver a Universal Binary version of Office and Messenger." Period. She did not say this will be done in March. In March they will ship an update with Spotlight support in Entourage.
Originally Posted by pendragon
Her presentation begins at 1:24:30
1:12:30 actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Utah
Status:
Offline
|
|
The only thing she says about updates is that they'll be releasing some updates "very soon" to "satisfy user requests" (sync services, spotlight support, etc.) and that those updates will be available in March.
The FAQ clearly states that since Office runs fine under Rossetta, so they won't bother re-releasing it as a universal binary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I run it on my iMac (1.83 CD), and with the stock 512 RAM, it ran pretty sluggish, and loaded up in approx 30 seconds. Now with 1.5 gig RAM, it loads in about 5 secs, and it MUCH faster
|
iMac Core Duo 1.83 Ghz | 1.25GB RAM | 160HD, MacBook Core Duo 1.83 Ghz | 13.3" | 60HD | 1.0GB RAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Georgetown, TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
Harv
27" i7 iMac (10.10.3), iPhone 5 (iOS 8.3)
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. ~Voltaire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: New York City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Intel iMac 2.0Ghz, 1Gb Ram, takes longer to launch the app, but once open, it runs faster than my old sawtooth G4 (1.4Ghz) ran word natively. Certainly useable.
L
|
iPhone 3G 16Gb
24" 2.8Ghz Core 2 Duo iMac, 4GB/320GB/256MB
12" AlBook 1Ghz/768Mb/80Gb/Combo/AX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm running 2004 on my intel imac, and while it's a tiny but slow, it still runs fine by me.
|
-> 20" iMac Core Duo, 1GB RAM, lame superdrive that burns at 2x
-> MacBook Pro 2GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM
-> MacBook 2.16GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|