 |
 |
UFS versus HFS+ formatting.
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Can anyone give us the lowdown on whether I should reformat my hard disk to UFS before running OS-X? What are the differences between them?
------------------
Nathan Zamprogno,
Manager, Baliset Solutions
[email protected]
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Jamaica Plain, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you have to ask....use HFS+.
UFS is good for dedicated servers but has problems with Classic software.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
There must be a dozen threads about that here. Search this and the Support forum for "UFS HFS" to find them.
[This message has been edited by Scott_H (edited 04-01-2001).]
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New Orleans, LA
Status:
Offline
|
|
you want HFS+
UFS is there for migration of some unix apps (to help some developers port their apps), and for servers. It doesn't support 2 forks in a file like HFS+ does. so classic apps get seperated into 2 files, 1 for data and 1 for resource.
-vasu
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
You're right- I should have done a search first before making my post. There's heaps of stuff already there. Stop posting to this thread.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top