|
|
Unreal Tournament 3
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Do you think a MBP could run this beast of a game? (on windows or mac)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
It will probably run fairly decent, but wont look as good as PS3 or a high end PC.
|
_________________
- highstakes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have no doubt that any G5 or Intel Mac will run UT3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'd be impressed if anything other than a Quad G5 or higher ran it
|
we don't have time to stop for gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, the new MBP running windows can run Oblicion at around 40 - 50 frames. That's not bad at all. I'm sure you can run UT# at medium settings, low if worst comes to worst with a 8600GT 256mb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
i think an intel mac could do it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Its just i have been out of the loop with Games for a while and Im gonna get the MBP. when i saw the games i got excited i would love to go from playing Medal of Honor Spearhead to playing this game!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
I read this in an IRC chat posted today:
When can we expect to hear about MINIMUM system specs for the game?
MarkRein[Epic]: When the game ships and people are hollering about how amazed they are that an incredible game like UT3 can run on their not-so-new systems! Awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
"not so new"
nice dodge of a question...
|
we don't have time to stop for gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London'ish
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
I have no doubt that any G5 or Intel Mac will run UT3.
I seriously doubt it.. My G5 iMac (rev a) is adequate with UT2004. But it really doesn't stand a chance with UT3. I think the latest iMacs should do ok enough however.
As Peter said, its going to need something with plenty of oomph, particularly in the graphics hardware department.
|
The worst thing about having a failing memory is..... no, it's gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
"Oomph in the graphics hardware department" is precisely what the new iMacs lack. /beats horse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Grrr
I seriously doubt it.. My G5 iMac (rev a) is adequate with UT2004.
A MacBook with GMA950 can play UT2004. I just tried it the other day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
UT3 for Mac was officially announced today, to be released early 2008. No system requirements given yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Have you got a linky to the announcement?
|
Mac Pro Dual 3.0 Dual-Core
MacBook Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Runs faster on Vista than XP on my MBP. Doubt Leopard would come close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Whoa, do you enjoy it? Give us a review!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
Whoa, do you enjoy it? Give us a review!
I enjoy it but can only play against bots until I sort out a new DSL connection. It's pretty damn fast on my MBP with all details cranked up. There are two things you will note. First is it has less maps than UT2004. That's the bad. The second is that the bot AI is soooo hard on regular settings you will need to be a UT genius to capture and return a flag to base. We're in a new era, people. These bots have more CPU power driving them. In a few years we're going to be Kasparoved. Maybe even next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Are the bots better players, anticipating your moves, etc? Or are they just aiming better on regular settings?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by reader50
Are the bots better players, anticipating your moves, etc? Or are they just aiming better on regular settings?
The bots can beat the crap out of you in every way unless you are really really good. Capture The Flag isn't easy at all on regular settings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hyrule
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anybody knows the system requirements? I'm curious if the G5 it's supported, or only for Intel.
|
The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look and do nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|