Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > 2008 Mac Pro memory configuration

2008 Mac Pro memory configuration
Thread Tools
kupan787
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: San Jose, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 22, 2008, 03:15 PM
 
So I purchased a new Mac Pro with the stock 2 GBs. I want to upgrade the memory, as I have heard that having 4 slots filled will yield better performance. My question is does it matter if those 2 slots are filled with like sized RAM modules? Do I have to now stick with 1 GB sticks to maximize performance? Or can I stick in 2x2GB and still expect to maximize my performance?
     
kupan787  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: San Jose, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 24, 2008, 01:43 AM
 
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
     
Bigfoot
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Connecticut
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 24, 2008, 02:46 PM
 
Info here... barefeats
MacPro 2.8/8-core Xeon/10.5.8/8GB ram. MacBook Pro 2.26/10.6.2/4GB ram/250GB drive. Airport Extreme 802.11n
     
mduell
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 25, 2008, 08:24 PM
 
Yes, 4 modules is better than 2, and no, the second two don't have to match the first two.
     
francklazare
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 20, 2008, 01:04 PM
 
Ok, do I get this straight: one could add 4GBs (2x2GBS) to the stock 2GBs (2x1GBs) by moving the stock modules to the bottom riser and replacing them with the new modules on the top riser? But the performance would be better by adding 4x1GBs instead? How would you add these? Would it make more sense to first buying 2x1GBs, then later purchase 2x2GBs, to make it 8GBs total. Does that make more sense, or should I purchase 6GBs right away? I'm on a budget. This is a bit confusing.
     
Aegis
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 20, 2008, 04:48 PM
 
I would suggest 4x2GB and sell the 2x1GB that came with it. Then you have 8GB in the second best configuration and room for growth.
     
schalliol
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Carmel, IN, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 20, 2008, 10:54 PM
 
I don't know yet what the performance impact will be, but I got 2x2, put them in the top and moved one of the 1s down to the bottom. I certainly wouldn't fill the machine with 1GB units, as that's just crippling expansion. Further, a set of 2 2GB is cheaper than 2 sets of 1GB (got mine at OWC). I know it would be a bit faster though.
( Last edited by schalliol; Feb 20, 2008 at 11:12 PM. )
iMac Late '15 5K 27" 4.0 Quad i7 24/512GB SSD OWC ThunderDock 2 Blu-Ray ±RW MBP '14 Retina 15" 2.6 16/1TB iPhone 7+ 128 Jet Black iPad Pro 128 + Cellular

FOR SALE: MP '06 Yosemite 8x3.0 24/240GB SSD RAID 0, 240GB SSD, 1.5TB HDD RAID 0, 1TB HDD, Blu-Ray±RW, Radeon HD 5770
     
bender
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Houston
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 25, 2008, 03:01 PM
 
Thanks for the info...I'm about to buy some 2GB's as well.
     
Gareth Johnston
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 25, 2008, 04:09 PM
 
Do not sell the 1GB sticks, if your mac pro buggers up, you need to have those for sending it back to Apple.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,