 |
 |
Why is the iMac slower than the eMac?
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
I just can't get my head around that. I haven't had the opportunity to test it myself but people seem to have done so...
If the only difference is the display could it be that CRTs (eMac) are less demanding on the CPU?
This could be by way of processor cycles required to produce a given image, refresh rate differences, widescreen aspect of the iMac vs. traditional aspect of CTR, digital output to the FP etc. etc. - just throwin' ideas at this stage.
Alternatively, is the iMac deliberately underclocked (or something) to avoid cooking itself?
Well - whaddayathink? 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Earth
Status:
Offline
|
|
everything has a pro and cons..
Personally i prefer flatscreen because it wouldn't spoilt my eye-sight...
however, CRT does...
|
17" widescreen LCD, 1GHz PowerPC G4,
1GB DDR266 SDRAM, 80GB Ultra ATA HD,
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX, 64MB DDR video memory
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top