 |
 |
128mb vs 64mb VRAM, any reason besides games? (Page 2)
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Semi Posting Retirement *ReJoice!*
Status:
Offline
|
|
Would Definitely help resale Value
|
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've heard from a few people that the 16 MB cache is really kind of a gimmick and the Hitachi is slightly faster anyway (but barely enough to really matter). I've also heard the Hitachi is a bit quieter, but again it's probably really minor. I doubt there's enough of a difference either way to get excited about.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
There isn't even much of a difference in games between 64mb and 128mb of video RAM. Video RAM helps with high MB textures, but the PowerBook is simply too slow to run with high textures anyways. You may noticed some incremental gains in Tiger with more video RAM.
|
|
MacBook Pro 15" 2.4Ghz
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top