Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > What does Steve use?

What does Steve use?
Thread Tools
jettyboy
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pahoa,HI, & San Diego,CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2005, 10:22 PM
 
Aloha, I apologize if this has been answered before, I searched but couldn't find it on these forms so here's my inquiry. I'd like to know exactly what kind of set-up Steve Jobs uses for his presentations at MW. His seem much faster than any G5's I've used. Does he use an "off the shelf" machine, or one that is juiced up for him? If anyone knows the specs that would be great. Mahalo in advance for any shared info... JB
     
nbnz
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2005, 10:27 PM
 
I would guess, with no basis whatsoever, that it's just a Dual 2.5 but pumped up with 8GB of RAM. And the fasted internet connection money can buy for his iChat video and iTMS demos.
iMac, Intel Core-Duo 2GHz, 2GB, 250GB, OS X 10.4
PowerBook 12", 867MHz, 640MB, 60GB, OS X 10.4
iMac G3, 333MHz, 288MB, 6GB, OS X 10.3
iPods: 3G iPod, 1G mini, 1G shuffle, 2G nano
     
bradoesch
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2005, 11:53 PM
 
More wild guessing. Steve's people could wildly overclock a good machine and he'd always have something faster than what's available. He could even be using a 3 GHz+ CPU for all we know. And then overclocked. Just because they can't produce something in quantity doesn't mean Steve doesn't have access to one of them.
     
ManOfSteal
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Outfield - #24
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2005, 11:56 PM
 
Indeed, it's VERY fast:

     
Link
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hyrule
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 12:11 AM
 
lol, no, it's probably a sample machine After all, just because 3ghz chips don't yield well, doesn't mean he can't have one.
Aloha
     
Millennium
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 12:13 AM
 
It's probably the fastest Mac they offer -if not a prototype of the next revision- upgraded as far as it will go. Sort of a shame; executives of computer makers really should be made to work on the lowest-end model currently in production.

That said, the other thing to realize is that many demos at trade shows and such are faked; they're set up to do exactly what's going to be shown in the demo and not much else. The end result is that it naturally performs faster than "the real thing"; that's what it's supposed to do. If you've ever wondered why you're only rarely allowed to actually touch the demo machines, this is (not always, but often) why.
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
     
juanvaldes
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 12:44 AM
 
It only makes sense to use the fasters system around, dont' want to look bad waiting for stuff to happen. having said that I would not risk the minor speed gains using prototype systems.

Of course they run though everything before, pre-launch apps, keep different demo's on different boxes etc.
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive.
- Thomas Jefferson, 1787
     
MilkmanDan
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: My Powerbook, in Japan!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 01:11 AM
 
I'm guessing 8 GIGs of RAM. Obviously.
     
nbnz
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 01:15 AM
 
Originally posted by Millennium:
That said, the other thing to realize is that many demos at trade shows and such are faked; they're set up to do exactly what's going to be shown in the demo and not much else. The end result is that it naturally performs faster than "the real thing"; that's what it's supposed to do. If you've ever wondered why you're only rarely allowed to actually touch the demo machines, this is (not always, but often) why.
Except the Spotlight image viewer crash
iMac, Intel Core-Duo 2GHz, 2GB, 250GB, OS X 10.4
PowerBook 12", 867MHz, 640MB, 60GB, OS X 10.4
iMac G3, 333MHz, 288MB, 6GB, OS X 10.3
iPods: 3G iPod, 1G mini, 1G shuffle, 2G nano
     
demograph68
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 01:27 AM
 
Originally posted by nbnz:
Except the Spotlight image viewer crash
**** happens.
     
nbnz
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 01:54 AM
 
Originally posted by demograph68:
**** happens.
exactly, "that's why we have backup systems"
iMac, Intel Core-Duo 2GHz, 2GB, 250GB, OS X 10.4
PowerBook 12", 867MHz, 640MB, 60GB, OS X 10.4
iMac G3, 333MHz, 288MB, 6GB, OS X 10.3
iPods: 3G iPod, 1G mini, 1G shuffle, 2G nano
     
MilkmanDan
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: My Powerbook, in Japan!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 02:15 AM
 
It beats Gate's f-ing up on the late show. That was class.
     
mishap
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 08:52 AM
 
well when he was in the hospital this fall i remember him saying he /was/ using the 17-inch powerbook.
     
Superchicken
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 08:59 AM
 
My guess, Dual 2.5, tricked out RAM, and the best graphics card money can buy . Oh wait... I heard Steve uses an x86 laptop with NeXTSTEP on it

Seriously though, I'm surprised Steve doesn't run Dual monitors... I would.
     
moonmonkey
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 09:02 AM
 
Originally posted by juanvaldes:
Of course they run though everything before, pre-launch apps, keep different demo's on different boxes etc.
They should have launched apps via documents before the Keynote, It took Steve by surprise when the "do you want to launch ?? with ??" dialog came up.
     
Goldfinger
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 09:34 AM
 
Originally posted by moonmonkey:
They should have launched apps via documents before the Keynote, It took Steve by surprise when the "do you want to launch ?? with ??" dialog came up.
Yeah it looked for a second that he didn't knew what that was.

iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
     
mitchell_pgh
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 10:10 AM
 
Also, I wonder if they alter the OS in any way. I would go on to say that they buy the much faster HD.

The reason Jobs doesn't use dual monitors is the same reason he doesn't use a 30" screen. He wants to appear as though the setup he is using is "the average Mac."
     
hyperb0le
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 11:56 AM
 
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
The reason Jobs doesn't use dual monitors is the same reason he doesn't use a 30" screen. He wants to appear as though the setup he is using is "the average Mac."
Plus, it would be worthless to have dual monitors for the keynote presentation demos. The screen projection would either have to be shrunk down to accommodate both screens, or the projection would have to alternate which screen is being shown. When you are only demoing one or two apps at a time, dual monitors would be a waste. That said, I'm sure he's running a quad-display setup in his actual office
     
cenutrio
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: missing
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 01:57 PM
 
However, he seem to use an iMac G5 last week
-original iMac, TiPB 400, Cube, Macbook (black), iMac 24¨, plus the original iPod and a black nano 4GB-
     
Peter
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 02:05 PM
 
Just a high spec G5. I doubt its any super dooper prototype.
     
Sarc
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 02:12 PM
 
I owuld say that it's some sort of Demo Optimized version of OS X, on a stock, fully upgraded, G5.

Remember the OS X 10.0 Keynote ? Steve rezised windows faster on his-at the time- high end Dual 500 MHz G4, than on any other Mac I have ever seen.
:: frankenstein / lcd-less TiBook / 1GHz / radeon 9000 64MB / 1GB RAM / w/ext. 250GB fw drive / noname usb bluetooth dongle / d-link usb 2.0 pcmcia card / X.5.8
:: unibody macbook pro / 2.4 Ghz C2D / 6GB RAM / dell 2407wfp - X.6.3
     
Aiglos
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ottawa, ON
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 02:42 PM
 
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
Also, I wonder if they alter the OS in any way.
LOL, the tweak comes in the form of 10.4.

Seriously, I think It's a 2.5 G5 with a clean install of the OS, maybe more ram and a better video card. Nothing fancy.
     
Thorin
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2005, 02:49 PM
 
Originally posted by moonmonkey:
They should have launched apps via documents before the Keynote, It took Steve by surprise when the "do you want to launch ?? with ??" dialog came up.
Wasn't that after he'd switched to the backup? Perhaps someone got careless and didn't setup the backup quite like the primary?
12" Rev B PB
     
rtamesis
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 19, 2005, 12:16 AM
 
Steve was running the latest version of OS X Tiger, so it wasn't surprising when he encountered that bug when demonstrating Spotlight.
     
PurpleGiant
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 19, 2005, 01:08 AM
 
Originally posted by Thorin:
Wasn't that after he'd switched to the backup? Perhaps someone got careless and didn't setup the backup quite like the primary?
Yes. From memory he accidentally clicked a wrong button in Spotlight, which caused the machine to crash. He quickly switched to the (identical looking) backup system and carried on. But since that point, a few things didn't work 'quite right', as it seemed that this backup system hadn't been run through as much as the original one.
     
Xeo
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Austin, MN, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 19, 2005, 03:28 AM
 
Yeah obviously the demo mac was not run through and everything was going for the first time.

I wouldn't be surprised if he has an average G5 under his desk and a power book for travel. He doesn't strike me as kind of guy who would have the fastest just cause he can.
     
Thilo Ettelt
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: City of Beck's beer
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 19, 2005, 06:50 AM
 
Originally posted by Millennium:
Sort of a shame; executives of computer makers really should be made to work on the lowest-end model currently in production.
I used to code my Internet Kiosk software on my old 300 MHz Blueberry iBook before I sold it to the other company. Speed is not equal to productivity. I miss Project Builder


- Thilo
     
Randman
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 19, 2005, 07:27 AM
 
I didn't email Steve directly, but I did just send an email to Apple asking for info on what he uses for the keynotes as well as daily usage. See if we get any details.

This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
     
GoGoReggieXPowars
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tronna
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 19, 2005, 08:15 PM
 
Originally posted by Millennium:
It's probably the fastest Mac they offer -if not a prototype of the next revision- upgraded as far as it will go. Sort of a shame; executives of computer makers really should be made to work on the lowest-end model currently in production.
Why, exactly? If I got that far up the company I'd want the best thing available.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,