Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Photographers - What Do You Use?

Photographers - What Do You Use?
Thread Tools
DeathToWindows
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 12:30 PM
 
So, I just upgraded my rig and was wondering what people use around here...

Nikon F4s (F4+MB-21)
Nikon AI-S 20mm/f2.8
Sigma 35-80/f4-5.6
Vivitar 28-210/f3.5-5.6
Nikon SB-25

Canon AE-1
Canon 50mm/f1.8
Generic 80-200/f4-5.6


...oh, yeah, got the F4 for 100 after trading in my old N90 rig

Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
     
wdlove
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 12:38 PM
 
I use a Digital HP camera, just for home use!

"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
     
ghost_flash
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 12:50 PM
 
Originally posted by DeathToWindows:
So, I just upgraded my rig and was wondering what people use around here...

Nikon F4s (F4+MB-21)
Nikon AI-S 20mm/f2.8
Sigma 35-80/f4-5.6
Vivitar 28-210/f3.5-5.6
Nikon SB-25

Canon AE-1
Canon 50mm/f1.8
Generic 80-200/f4-5.6


...oh, yeah, got the F4 for 100 after trading in my old N90 rig
Nice collection.
Tell me. Why do you need both a 28-210, 5.6 and a 35-80, 5.6?
The Vivitar looks to be the best of both. Is it preference?

The Nikon F4s is sweet.
Do you scan your negatives?

I'd rather go all digital myself. I've had it with film, though I would love to work with some large format photorgraphy (someday).

http://www.largeformatphotography.info/

I diidn't mean to hijack your thread, so I'll get back to being on track:

I don't have any cameras right now, and it is sort of eating at me a tad.

Here is my pick for my purchase to get back into the game:


This will probably be my first purchase, to get me going. This camera looks to be the one that fits all of my initial criterea, and would serve my creative needs for quite a while.

Again, I would love to get into a pro system someday, but priorities! as they say come first.
...
     
cjrivera
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 01:14 PM
 
Recently got a Canon Digital Rebel (after hearing many good things about it from people on this and many other forums). Just getting used to a SLR camera, but the pictures have been getting better (operator error, not camera).
     
paully dub
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Paris, NY, Rome, etc
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 01:59 PM
 
I've got plenty of cameras, from my nikon fm2 to my 4x5 wisner field camera. But honestly all I ever use these days is my nikon coolpix 4500 or my gf's pentax optio s. Digital has changed everything.

Adopt-A-Yankee
     
ThinkInsane
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Night's Plutonian shore...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 02:08 PM
 
Although I used to be a big hobbyist, time restraints have pretty well put that out to pasture. I would like to get back into it though. I have a Minolta Maxxum 7000 that I bought when I was in high school that still works as good as the day I bought it, and I have a Kodak dc3700 digital, that's an ok camera, although I wish it had at least a 3x zoom. I've been thinking about getting one of the digital rebels. Most of what I read about them has been pretty good.
Nemo me impune lacesset
     
Scientist
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Madison
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 02:19 PM
 
Originally posted by cjrivera:
Recently got a Canon Digital Rebel (after hearing many good things about it from people on this and many other forums). Just getting used to a SLR camera, but the pictures have been getting better (operator error, not camera).
Same here. I'm a newby with this stuff but I couldnt be much happier with the thing. Do any more expereinced people know of any good macrolenses or underwater casings. I'm doing research up north all next summer and the carnivorous plants, and fish would make good subjects.
Is it not reasonable to anticipate that our understanding of the human mind would be aided greatly by knowing the purpose for which it was designed?
-George C. Williams
     
Cadaver
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 02:47 PM
 
Nikon N60 for film, Nikon D100 for digital.
Nikon SB-50DX flash.
Sigma 28-300mm (F3.5-6.3) lens.
     
ghost_flash
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 03:01 PM
 
Originally posted by Cadaver:
Nikon N60 for film, Nikon D100 for digital.
Nikon SB-50DX flash.
Sigma 28-300mm (F3.5-6.3) lens.
Here is the Canon EOS 300D; Nikon D100; D70
compared.

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/nikond70/

That D70 looks sweet, but if you demand a metal
body, then the D100 still rocks.
...
     
Spliff
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Canaduh
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 03:10 PM
 
I've got a Canon Elan IIe and a Canon Digital Elph Powershot S300.

Digital is definitely convenient, but I have two complaints about it: storage and color.

At least with negatives and slides, I can store them in sleeves in binders and never have to worry about them. Someone can come across them 100 years later and develop them. With digital photos, I'm going to have to update the medium they're stored on every few years or so. That's going to be a big hassle. Does anyone have any tips or suggestions for a simple, effective method of organizing and storing digital prints?

For the most part, digital cameras have decent color, but I love the distinctive look a specific brand of film can give to photos. Slides, especially, can give you some punchy, saturated colors. Digital photos can't. So, I have to go into Photoshop and much around for a couple of hours. Most pro photographers already do that, I'm sure. And I do that to a certain extent. But I really like trying for the perfect shot without digital manipulation.
     
DeathToWindows  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 04:04 PM
 
Originally posted by ghost_flash:
Nice collection.
Tell me. Why do you need both a 28-210, 5.6 and a 35-80, 5.6?
The Vivitar looks to be the best of both. Is it preference?
Just purchasing overlap; I got the 35-80 back in 2000 and bought the 28-210 used last year... the 35-80 is the sharper lens - although I'd rather have all Nikon glass...

Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
     
iMOTOR
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 04:42 PM
 
Mamiya Rb67 for advertising at work, Canon Elan IIe and olympus digital for the other stuff. I've got about 12 old pentax slr cameras laying around that I don't use much anymore except for b&w since all my favorite 35mm color films have been discontinued. Kodak...Arrrrgh!!
     
Yose
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 05:18 PM
 
Konica FC-1 (What I use for B&W)
Konica Hexanon AR 55mm F1.7
Konica Hexanon AR 28mm F3.5
Sigma 28�85mm F3.5�4.5
Unitax 85�210mm Macro F3.8 with a 2x Konica Teleconverter

Digital Rebel
Tamron SP 24�135mm F3.5�5.6
Canon Speedlite 550EX
Yose.
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
     
Demonhood
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Land of the Easily Amused
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 05:28 PM
 


Nikon N70 with a 35-80mm f4-5.6
handful of filters

been putting off getting any new lenses because of the price, and because i'll be getting the Nikon D70 once it is released.

on the digital front, i use a Canon 230 (elph) and a Sony F707. neither of them are mine, but i still use them.
     
Cubeoid
Baninated
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dead whale
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 05:33 PM
 
lo...mo.
     
ryju
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 05:45 PM
 
I use a really old Canon AE-1 with standard 50mm lens. Also a Canon wide angle lens and 135mm telephoto lens.

Oh yeah and a mountable Canon flash. This camera is 20 years old and hasn't failed me yet.
     
starman
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 05:52 PM
 
Sony F707

Mike

Home - Twitter - Sig Wall-Retired - Flickr
     
John F. Smith
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 05:53 PM
 
LOMO
     
clt2
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 05:54 PM
 
For a second there, I read the subject as "Pornographers - What Do You Use?"
     
DeathToWindows  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 06:02 PM
 
Originally posted by clt2:
For a second there, I read the subject as "Pornographers - What Do You Use?"

Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
     
John F. Smith
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 06:08 PM
 
Originally posted by DeathToWindows:
     
splatq
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 06:24 PM
 
I use a Sony DSC-F717. Great camera, takes really nice pictures.





Warning: Pictures are about 1.4mb each.
     
Powaqqatsi
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The City Of Diamonds
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 06:26 PM
 
Film:
Nikon F3
Nikon F90X
Nikkor 24mm 2.8
Nikkor 50mm 1.4
Nikkor 85mm 1.8
Nikkor 135mm 2.5
Novoflex 200mm 3,8 with a 2x teleconverter accesory.
Nikon SB-24 Flash

Digital:
Nikon Coolpix 995

     
DeathToWindows  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 06:39 PM
 
Originally posted by Powaqqatsi:

Nikkor 24mm 2.8
Nikkor 50mm 1.4
Nikkor 85mm 1.8
Nikkor 135mm 2.5
drool...

I want them in AF-D though

Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
     
vexborg
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 54 56' 38" .058N / 10 0' 33" .071E
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 06:52 PM
 
Panasonic DMC-FZ2 - only 2 MPixels, but has a Leica DC Vario-Elmarit 1:2.8/4.6 - 55.2 lens (12x optical zoom, which equals 35-420 mm in a normal 35mm camera).

This is what I need, since my pictures only end up at a website

Review of FZ1 - ok, the FZ2 is a bit newer, and has the same features as the FZ1, but with an Program/Aperture/Shutter mode.

Edit: Corrected spelling.
     
DeathToWindows  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 07:03 PM
 
Originally posted by vexborg:
Panasonic DMC-FZ2 - only 2 MPixels, but has a Leica DC Vario-Elmarit 1:2.8/4.6 - 55.2 lens (12x optical zoom, which equals 35-420 mm in a normal 35mm camera).
I just say the FZ2 today at the local camera store... they were waxing rapsodic over it.

Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
     
wolfen
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On this side of there
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 07:12 PM
 
Originally posted by Spliff:
I've got a Canon Elan IIe and a Canon Digital Elph Powershot S300.

Slides, especially, can give you some punchy, saturated colors. Digital photos can't.
I have an Elan 2e, as well and a Canon G3 digital.

I agree with you on the color bit. The G3 is a good one and it still lacks the punch. I took the Elan to Sedona on a hot air balloon ride and to the grand canyon and ran off a few rolls of slides. They are the most beautiful shots. There's no way the digital would have matched them.


wolfen
Do you want forgiveness or respect?
     
Powaqqatsi
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The City Of Diamonds
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 07:37 PM
 
Originally posted by DeathToWindows:
drool...

I want them in AF-D though
Pretty good stuff yeah
The 85mm is an AF-D. The others are manual non-chip lenses, I'll have to exchange them soon as I'm going digital in the near future. (D100 does not work correctly with these old lenses )

EDIT: And I SOOO need a 35mm
     
ShortcutToMoncton
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 10:23 PM
 
Minolta DiMage 7i here.

Wish I'd waited for the Canon 10D to get a little cheaper, but oh well....has a great lens at least, even if the noise and battery life aren't the best.

greg
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
     
DeathToWindows  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 13, 2004, 10:36 PM
 
Originally posted by ShortcutToMoncton:
Minolta DiMage 7i here.
My school's yearbook bought one in 2002... great pseudo-slr digital.

Rechargable AA's and a big CF card - schweet!

Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
     
spiky_dog
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Plainview, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 12:25 AM
 
Originally posted by Scientist:
Same here. I'm a newby with this stuff but I couldnt be much happier with the thing. Do any more expereinced people know of any good macrolenses or underwater casings. I'm doing research up north all next summer and the carnivorous plants, and fish would make good subjects.
macros for canon abound: canon 50mm f/2.5, sigma 50mm (whose max f-stop i don't know offhand), canon 100mm f/2.8 usm and non-usm flavors, sigma and tamron, i believe, with 105mm f/2.8 macros, canon, sigma, tamron 180mm f/3.5 macros (the canon and sigma 180s being USM/HSM). i have the sigma 180mm macro and it is a great lens.

http://tjclark.ath.cx/images/subjects/macro.html

what i shoot:

canon D30
sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 HSM EX
canon 28mm f/1.8 USM
canon 50mm f/1.4 USM
canon 135mm f/2.0L USM
sigma 180mm f/3.5 HSM macro

my site (check sig) has lots of pics that belie the "digital can't be punchy". shoot a quality dslr in raw mode and you can do absolutely anything in conversion + photoshop. emulating velvia is quite easy, for instance (search on "photoshop emulate velvia" or the like and you'll find many results, i'm sure).

http://tjclark.ath.cx/images/favorit...s/Images/5.jpg [tooki says: NO HUGE INLINE IMAGES!]
( Last edited by tooki; Mar 16, 2004 at 01:48 AM. )
     
DeathToWindows  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 12:30 AM
 
Originally posted by spiky_dog:

sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 HSM EX
canon 28mm f/1.8 USM
canon 50mm f/1.4 USM
canon 135mm f/2.0L USM
sigma 180mm f/3.5 HSM macro
currently mopping drool off my floor & keyboard...

NICE!

Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
     
spiky_dog
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Plainview, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 02:33 AM
 
Originally posted by DeathToWindows:
currently mopping drool off my floor & keyboard...

NICE!
what can i say, i like available light and fast primes. the 420ex stays in its case unless i'm shooting biking indoors at the skatepark.
     
TonyIC
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Iowa City, The Mid-West's biggest bar
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 09:42 AM
 
I use a Konica FT-1 Motor with a Sigma Zoom-Master 35-70mm.

The best $5 I ever spent
     
CrackedButter
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 51st State of America
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 10:03 AM
 
What would you people say is the best camera out there?
"Absorb what is useful, discard what is not and add what is uniquely your own." - Bruce Lee
     
kovacs
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 10:11 AM
 
Canon D60, love it, great camera
     
SimeyTheLimey
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 10:32 AM
 
Leica M6-TTL
Leica M4-P
Leica 35mm Summicron-Asph f2
Leica 50mm Summicron-M f2
Leitz 90mm Summicron f2
Voigtlander/Cosina 15mm f4.5 Heliar

Hasselblad 500c/m
Zeiss 80mm Planar-C
Zeiss 150mm Sonnar-C
2 x A12 backs
Kiev prism
NPC Polaroid back
Hasselblad waist level finder
Minolta Autometer IV light meter
Sekonic Twinmate light meter.

Quantum Q2 flash with Turbo battery and TTL adapter for the Leica M6-TTL
Novatron 1000 w/s studio flash with 4 heads
Background stands

Omega D2v enlarger
Schneider Componon 80mm f4 enlarging lens
Schneider Componon 50mm f2.8 enlarging lens.

That's the major stuff.
     
Sealobo
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The Intertube
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 10:51 AM
 
Originally posted by kovacs:
Canon D60, love it, great camera
That's what i have. Apart from the multiplier effect, it's perfect~
     
dampeoples
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 11:27 AM
 
Nikon N65, 2MP Kodak digital and a Lomo and a Holga to play with.
     
Powaqqatsi
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The City Of Diamonds
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 11:58 AM
 
Originally posted by CrackedButter:
What would you people say is the best camera out there?
Nikon F3 or Leica M6.

It seems to mee that Simey has really the most droolworthy equipement

Oh yeah, I have an enlarger too: Meopta 5a (not sure about the type really ) with Nikkor Lens.
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 12:37 PM
 
I use a Pentax MZ-5n SLR. A remarkably reliable body. Lightweight and powerful.
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
DeathToWindows  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 02:38 PM
 
Originally posted by SimeyTheLimey:
Leica M6-TTL
Leica M4-P
Leica 35mm Summicron-Asph f2
Leica 50mm Summicron-M f2
Leitz 90mm Summicron f2
Voigtlander/Cosina 15mm f4.5 Heliar

Hasselblad 500c/m
Zeiss 80mm Planar-C
Zeiss 150mm Sonnar-C
2 x A12 backs
Kiev prism
NPC Polaroid back
Hasselblad waist level finder
Minolta Autometer IV light meter
Sekonic Twinmate light meter.

Quantum Q2 flash with Turbo battery and TTL adapter for the Leica M6-TTL
Novatron 1000 w/s studio flash with 4 heads
Background stands

Omega D2v enlarger
Schneider Componon 80mm f4 enlarging lens
Schneider Componon 50mm f2.8 enlarging lens.

That's the major stuff.
holy shite! great gear - so is it a hobby or are you a pro?

Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
     
SimeyTheLimey
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 02:46 PM
 
Originally posted by DeathToWindows:
holy shite! great gear - so is it a hobby or are you a pro?
I used to be a freelance commercial photographer. Now I'm just a hobbyist again. Or I would be if I had the free time.
     
DeathToWindows  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 02:52 PM
 
Originally posted by SimeyTheLimey:
I used to be a freelance commercial photographer. Now I'm just a hobbyist again. Or I would be if I had the free time.
with enough gear to give me really serious gear lust!

Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
     
euphras
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany, 51°51´51" N, 9°05´41" E
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 02:58 PM
 
A minolta XD 7 (sold as XD 11 in USA) with a 1:1.2 50 mm MC Rokkor (don�t need a flash very often ;-)



and a Minolta X-700 as my spare body


Macintosh Quadra 950, Centris 610, Powermac 6100, iBook dual USB, Powerbook 667 DVI, Powerbook 867 DVI, MacBook Pro early 2011
     
DeathToWindows  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Nashville, TN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 03:04 PM
 
Nice - amazing lens

So, how old is it (I know nothing about minolta)

Don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
     
euphras
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany, 51°51´51" N, 9°05´41" E
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2004, 03:13 PM
 
IIRC it was initially sold in 1976. I don�t know how long they produced it, but it was rated as a rare collectible when i bought it in 1990.
( Last edited by euphras; Mar 14, 2004 at 03:31 PM. )


Macintosh Quadra 950, Centris 610, Powermac 6100, iBook dual USB, Powerbook 667 DVI, Powerbook 867 DVI, MacBook Pro early 2011
     
antizero
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 15, 2004, 02:30 PM
 
Minolta Dimage 7hi
Minolta 3600 Flash
3-piece studio lighting (500W each)
Random assortment of basic filters


I used to have a Canon A-1 with a bunch of lenses, but it was getting too costly to process all the film I shot, so I took the plunge into digital with the Minolta, and I've been very happy. I don't have any other product experience to compare it to, but I have no complaints.
     
york28
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 16, 2004, 01:05 AM
 
I have:

Pentax ME Super body
Pentax 50mm f1.7
Starblitz 28mm f2.8
Soligor 85-205mm f3.8

I learned on a Pentax P30t, and bought this outfit on eBay recently when I had to part with that camera.

and:

Minolta Dimage F100 (rather noisy in my experience, which is too bad)

I'm currently deliberating between one of those new fangled digital SLRs and getting a good film/slide scanner and a newer 35mm body. I love all-manual SLRs but sometimes I miss actions shots due to the lack of auto-focus.

Some photos I've taken can be found here.
We need less Democrats and Republicans, and more people that think for themselves.

infinite expanse
     
spiky_dog
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Plainview, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 16, 2004, 01:27 AM
 
Originally posted by york28:

I'm currently deliberating between one of those new fangled digital SLRs and getting a good film/slide scanner and a newer 35mm body. I love all-manual SLRs but sometimes I miss actions shots due to the lack of auto-focus.

Some photos I've taken can be found here.
go dslr! having film processed is a pain whether you scan it or they do, and it takes too long. the only real shortcoming of the current $1500 crop of dslrs is wide angle, and something like the sigma 12-24 that i have takes care of that handily.

and nice photos. i like their look -- i'll have to go through all of them on a rainy day.
     
 
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,