|
|
Gates Slams Mac Ads, Questions Mac Security (Page 3)
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by anthology123
Only from my own experience, I have both a Mac OSX and PC (WinXP) both setup around the same time, in a fairly open University network. Both had passwords, but no firewall or anti-virus. In less than 2 minutes, the PC was hit with several worms and eventually rendered unusable. It had to be locked up tight with firewall, anti-virus and spyware detector. The Mac to this day (2 years now) still has no anti-virus, firewall still off and it has yet to be hacked or infected. To be fair, I will setup a new Vista system with the same level of security as the Mac and see how long it remains clean.
Experiments like this bugs me. In my opinion, its more indicative of the market than "which box is less secure". I don't know how true this is.. but I"m here at the RSA conference this week; and today, I sat in a Q&A session with a Russian A/V company president. He mentions that if you look at the exploits available for each OS (Windows, Linux, Mac etc..) - it will pretty much look like the market share for the respective OS's. In other words, Windows gets attacked more because the attacker can cover more area when they do this. In addition, you'll also find more attack tools against the MS platform for the same reason. This allows most script kiddies to use them against MS boxes - without really having to know what they're really doing.
You really want to see how safe OS X is (or any OS for that matter)? Advertise an offer of money to the first person to break in.. .I guarantee you it'll get owned faster than you think it will.
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Status:
Offline
|
|
The offer has been done before. Nothing.
Why not provide the info from this Russian company president? Oh...why bother. Let's just trust this tired theory....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the verge of insanity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by kcmac
The offer has been done before. Nothing.
Why not provide the info from this Russian company president? Oh...why bother. Let's just trust this tired theory....
Link to proof?
|
I like my water with hops, malt, hops, yeast, and hops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Rumor
Link to proof?
Hmmmm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: eating kernel
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by himself
Sadly, this is true. When Windows was on my Moms laptop (not vista, XP), we had it LOADED with Norton anti-virus crap. ANYTHING you did it would ask you if you wnated to do that. Got too annoying so I installed linux. Much better now.
|
Signature depreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "Working"
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by C.A.T.S. CEO
Sadly, this is true. When Windows was on my Moms laptop (not vista, XP), we had it LOADED with Norton anti-virus crap. ANYTHING you did it would ask you if you wnated to do that. Got too annoying so I installed linux. Much better now.
They're not talking about an anti-virus software. They're discussing the User Account Control in Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|