|
|
What for is this war and what for thousands died
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
(
Last edited by Hash; Apr 6, 2003 at 08:34 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
this will boost the world's economy right? is that what you meant?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Garden of Paradise Motel, Suite 3D
Status:
Offline
|
|
You mean that this war is all about oil? How could we have been so blind all this time!?!
Or maybe this war is about poor grammar? Which?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, your title's half right; "thousands" have yet to die. Even the Iraqi government, who stands to gain the most from inflating the casualty counts, hasn't claimed "thousands", or even one thousand. Or even five hundred, for that matter.
As for this war being about oil: if so, then not just the war, but also the European opposition to it. Europe does, after all, get much more oil from Iraq than the US does, and stands to gain more from the status quo. Which may be why the inspections were designed to never return conclusive proof either way.
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
finboy, your both points are very valid - thanks for advise, I ll take it into consideration for future posts.
Now the reason, I think the link deserves attention, is that until now we had a lot of speculations about oil motives of the war, some of them had been confirmed. But this link has one feature - it shows what pro-US iraqi future government is being assembled for quite clearly. Nothing is being said about development of democracy, social development and other normal policymaking things. NOPE. These guys are being brouht for the sole reason of privatizing Iraqi oil industry. Thats as simple as that. There is not WMD talk; there is no democracy talk; no one especially cares for Iraqi population. It has been stated quite cynically and clear that the only reason of this war and removal of Saddam is privatization of Iraqi oil industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Millenium, the reason of thousands is this news .
Of course, if you mean that US ministry of truth is not so precise as Iraqi ministry of information...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Denton, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
"This show is filmed before a live studio audience as soon as someone removes that dead guy!" - Stephen Colbert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Garden of Paradise Motel, Suite 3D
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by UNTiMac:
This whole "War in Iraq for oil" argument is such bunk.
Of course it is. Reasonable people never thought that in the first place, but it makes a really good thing to put on the protest sign since there's no real substance on that side of the political spectrum otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: south
Status:
Offline
|
|
You guys are complete idiots if you don't think that control of oil is part of the equation
and you are even bigger idiots if you think it is about bringing democracy to the Iraq people
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by shmerek:
You guys are complete idiots if you don't think that control of oil is part of the equation
and you are even bigger idiots if you think it is about bringing democracy to the Iraq people
And you sure make good reasons as to why we should believe it.
We wont be controlling the Oil, and the Iraqi people WILL be in a democracy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by finboy:
Of course it is. Reasonable people never thought that in the first place, but it makes a really good thing to put on the protest sign since there's no real substance on that side of the political spectrum otherwise.
Well they very well couldn't put
"Stop the war for liberating Iraq"
"Don't save the Iraqi people"
"The US is a big bully for helping the people of Iraq"
So they make up stuff. Even though there is ZERO proof or even a hint of it that they can show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
Even though there is ZERO proof or even a hint of it that they can show.
There are more than enought hints.
|
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Developer:
There are more than enought hints.
Yes, I read that, lots of speculation like this thread. And nowhere did I see proof that the US wasn't planning on liberating Iraq, or how the US would be controlling their oil from now on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
and the Iraqi people WILL be in a democracy.
Just like in Afghanistan eh?
villa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by villalobos:
Just like in Afghanistan eh?
villa
definately better than before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: south
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
And you sure make good reasons as to why we should believe it.
We wont be controlling the Oil, and the Iraqi people WILL be in a democracy.
I will believe it when I see it and I am not trying to convert your point of view, I have read enough of your posts to see where you stand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by shmerek:
I will believe it when I see it and I am not trying to convert your point of view, I have read enough of your posts to see where you stand.
don't you mean that you will knock it until you see it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: south
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mixin visuals:
don't you mean that you will knock it until you see it?
Looking at the past behavior of the US government I have every right to doubt their intentions.
Is it a crime to be skeptical? Sorry I don't tow the line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
its not wrong to be skeptical, but to automatically doubt from the beginning isn't good either.
there have never been so many informed eyes watching every move like that in iraq right now. i think everything is going to work out just fine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mixin visuals:
its not wrong to be skeptical, but to automatically doubt from the beginning isn't good either.
Pray tell, what is your bizarre definition of "skeptical", then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Spheric Harlot:
Pray tell, what is your bizarre definition of "skeptical", then?
skeptical doesn't mean automatically doubt to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: south
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mixin visuals:
skeptical doesn't mean automatically doubt to me
skep�ti�cal also scep�ti�cal adj.
Marked by or given to doubt
1. Of or pertaining to a sceptic or skepticism; characterized by skepticism; hesitating to admit the certainly of doctrines or principles; doubting of everything.
2. (Theol.) Doubting or denying the truth of revelation, or the sacred Scriptures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by shmerek:
skep�ti�cal also scep�ti�cal adj.
Marked by or given to doubt
1. Of or pertaining to a sceptic or skepticism; characterized by skepticism; hesitating to admit the certainly of doctrines or principles; doubting of everything.
2. (Theol.) Doubting or denying the truth of revelation, or the sacred Scriptures.
ok, than it doesn't mean automatically assume the worst
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mixin visuals:
ok, than it doesn't mean automatically assume the worst
Nobody was claiming it did.
you wrote:
its not wrong to be skeptical, but to automatically doubt from the beginning isn't good either.
Feel free to move the target again when caught with your pants down next time. We're not telling.
-s*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Spheric Harlot:
Nobody was claiming it did.
you wrote:
Feel free to move the target again when caught with your pants down next time. We're not telling.
-s*
i was just saying thats wasn't my current view of being skeptical. why say skeptical when you should have say doubt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mixin visuals:
i was just saying thats wasn't my current view of being skeptical. why say skeptical when you should have say doubt
Because that's what it means?
Are "big words" a problem, generally?
-s*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
yes and you have enlightened me. not really though
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: south
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Spheric Harlot:
Because that's what it means?
Are "big words" a problem, generally?
-s*
lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|