 |
 |
Picasa from Google: iPhoto for Windows
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
(
Last edited by xmacintosh; Sep 4, 2004 at 11:14 AM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm not surprised, the iPhoto interface works well and is simple.
I'm just surprised that they didn't pack it full of "features" and mess up the simplicity.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2004
Location: norway
Status:
Offline
|
|
I hope this will be available for OS X also. iPhoto sucks!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Just a groove in "G"
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've been using Picasa for a while now, it's really cool, fast too. Best thing though, is that it's free now.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southern California
Status:
Offline
|
|
If it remains free, i'd be surprised. I'm sure google didn't take it over to lose money. Either will be leveraged to sell ads, or it will become commercial ware. To me it looks like an iPhoto rip off.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Just a groove in "G"
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Eyenovation:
If it remains free, i'd be surprised. I'm sure google didn't take it over to lose money. Either will be leveraged to sell ads, or it will become commercial ware. To me it looks like an iPhoto rip off.
Not sure about the iPhoto rip-off, since it's just another photo management solution. It is though, IMO, much better than iPhoto in some areas, especially speed. I need to spend more time with the correction tools to se how it does, but so far i's all good.
I hope it stays free, cause it was a pain when Apple made iPhoto part of the iLife bundle, ie. have to pay.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top